|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 55 responses total. |
jaklumen
|
|
response 18 of 55:
| 
Sep 16 10:09 UTC 2002 |
I would tend to think eye contact is an okay thing for the visually oriented.
Nothing wrong with alternating eyes open and shut, either.
|
jazz
|
|
response 19 of 55:
|
Sep 16 13:34 UTC 2002 |
Some people find satisfaction in breaking small things, preferably
small shiny things that can be played with before breaking. Glass bottles
fit in that category rather nicely.
Re #18: I don't think anyone was suggesting constant eye contact the
whole time ...
|
jazz
|
|
response 20 of 55:
|
Sep 16 13:39 UTC 2002 |
Afterthought: constant eye contact would be CREEPY.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 21 of 55:
|
Sep 16 16:13 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
flem
|
|
response 22 of 55:
|
Sep 16 19:01 UTC 2002 |
for the record, since carson seems curious, any thoughtfulness I may have
implied in my disagreement with his post has been fairly well addressed by
previous comments. Mainly, that I sometimes like to watch when receiving a
blowjob. Not always, since I agree that very different experiences result
from watching vs. not watching, and both experiences are, IMO, worth
experiencing.
A couple of other random comments for the record, since I find myself on my
horse:
- who says humor and serious discussion are disjunct?
- I'm a firm believer in the "painfully earnest" school of Grex dialogue,
though IMO the painful part is, as it were, in the eye of the beholder.
- phenix' opinion loses all kinds of respect from me when he says emma from
caoine.org is "only ok".
|
phenix
|
|
response 23 of 55:
|
Sep 16 20:14 UTC 2002 |
i've seen prettier.
|
phenix
|
|
response 24 of 55:
|
Sep 16 20:14 UTC 2002 |
clairification, i've shagged prettier.
|
lelande
|
|
response 25 of 55:
|
Sep 16 20:21 UTC 2002 |
a bargain at twice the price.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 26 of 55:
|
Sep 16 20:41 UTC 2002 |
Re #24: I believe that like I believe that carson gets blowjobs.
|
carson
|
|
response 27 of 55:
|
Sep 16 21:42 UTC 2002 |
(although my friend Jim has declared me "the man most seriously in
need of a blowjob" [don't ask], I have to back Greg up here. sadly, he
*has* shagged prettier. I still haven't figured out how he does it, but
I don't understand the appeal of Extreme Elvis either.)
(I'm quite disappointed that I couldn't taunt phenix with such "locker
room" analogies as "you don't watch the mechanic while you're getting your
oil changed" and "when she's playing Yankee Doodle, keep your eyes off the
macaroni." perhaps I'll be able to use them some other day when I'm not
defending myself against allegations of misogyny.)
|
phenix
|
|
response 28 of 55:
|
Sep 17 01:03 UTC 2002 |
eh-hem, i'd like my mojo back actually.
when i find out who's stolen it i'm going to whip out my goonhand something
fierce
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 29 of 55:
|
Sep 17 02:15 UTC 2002 |
Is that an example of one of your pickup lines?
|
phenix
|
|
response 30 of 55:
|
Sep 17 02:20 UTC 2002 |
i don't really have pickup lines.
|
lelande
|
|
response 31 of 55:
|
Sep 17 06:44 UTC 2002 |
do you have a pickup truck?
|
phenix
|
|
response 32 of 55:
|
Sep 17 13:55 UTC 2002 |
uh, no, no ranger.
|
jazz
|
|
response 33 of 55:
|
Sep 17 18:14 UTC 2002 |
I don't buy it for a minute.
|
phenix
|
|
response 34 of 55:
|
Sep 17 19:16 UTC 2002 |
j00've seen my pimp green escourt.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 35 of 55:
|
Sep 17 19:26 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
lelande
|
|
response 36 of 55:
|
Sep 17 19:50 UTC 2002 |
living in a fast truck...
|
jazz
|
|
response 37 of 55:
|
Sep 17 20:19 UTC 2002 |
Clees thought my truck was manly. Heh.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 38 of 55:
|
Sep 17 20:53 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
phenix
|
|
response 39 of 55:
|
Sep 17 23:18 UTC 2002 |
yha, i don't think thats something one dude should say to another do,
um-hum, yha...
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 40 of 55:
|
Sep 18 03:58 UTC 2002 |
Especially a Dutch dude.
|
jazz
|
|
response 41 of 55:
|
Sep 18 13:33 UTC 2002 |
If you're expecting linguistic precision ...
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 42 of 55:
|
Sep 18 14:12 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|