response 19 of 25:

Jan 25 17:22 UTC 2007

Hm.  It appears that I mistakenly listed scholar as having accepted the
nomination in response 31 of the nominations item (resp:236,31), posted
on November 10.  It was an unintentional mistake, but definitely my
fault, and I apologize.

Since the error was made fully 20 days before the election started, and
acceptances are required to be made publicly in the item, I'm surprised
that nobody caught it.  But I guess those things happen.

By the way, I haven't talked to Marcus and can't comment on his reasons
for running, but having served with Jan on the board for the past year,
I think resp:16 is full of it as far as its characterization of janc's
motives are concerned.

response 21 of 25:

Jan 25 17:31 UTC 2007

I have to agree with remmers regarding janc's motives. I mean, he has
been on the board for a while now and was running for re-election. He
has been a very valuable member of the board too, fwiw. 

response 23 of 25:

Jan 25 21:59 UTC 2007

I have to disagree with you both (slynne and remmers.)  I don't see janc
rolling up his sleeves and engaging us here in this conference.  That alone
was how I drew my conclusion in #16.  You can say I'm full of it because he's
been there on the board but to me if you're not willing to participate
regularly in coop cf then what's the point of running?  Who does that
represent other than one's self?

response 25 of 25:

Feb 11 03:31 UTC 2007

re #24
 Grex Board of Directors Meeting: January 23, 2007

 Attending:  Mark Conger*, Dan Cross*, Lynne Fremont*, Joe Gelinas,
 Bruce Howard*, Larry Kestenbaum*, Jan Wolter*     * = board member