|
Grex > Iq > #136: Questions, anyone? | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 680 responses total. |
orinoco
|
|
response 178 of 680:
| 
May 18 16:54 UTC 1997 |
How can worse mean anything other than what it means?
|
toking
|
|
response 179 of 680:
|
Aug 2 05:02 UTC 1997 |
how bad is it when you cant remember to visit a conference?
|
bopkins
|
|
response 180 of 680:
|
Aug 2 18:53 UTC 1997 |
I don't know. How bad is it?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 181 of 680:
|
Aug 9 02:36 UTC 1997 |
Is it worse than when you remember to visit the conference and it's still
boring?
|
bopkins
|
|
response 182 of 680:
|
Aug 9 17:45 UTC 1997 |
Wouldn't it be even worse if the conference you visited was extremely active
and yet boring?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 183 of 680:
|
Aug 10 22:41 UTC 1997 |
Did I say that the conference was inactive?
Which conference are we refering to?
Isn't this a linked item?
Where are you?
Where am I?
|
bopkins
|
|
response 184 of 680:
|
Aug 11 01:55 UTC 1997 |
How active can a conference be if only two people reply to it?
|
bikeman
|
|
response 185 of 680:
|
Aug 11 03:15 UTC 1997 |
What would happen if I joined it? Would everything be cheery? Wouldn';t that
make 3 people iun this one conversation? Does that mean we each have one
third of the resposibility of the conversation? Are you going to let your
end down, Bopkins or orinoco?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 186 of 680:
|
Aug 11 16:52 UTC 1997 |
Are you implying that I would give up on my sole remaining active item?
|
bopkins
|
|
response 187 of 680:
|
Aug 11 22:02 UTC 1997 |
And is a three person conversation really better than one involving two
people? Does "the more the merrier" apply here?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 188 of 680:
|
Aug 12 15:17 UTC 1997 |
What about 'two's company, three's a crowd', hmm? Ever thought of that one?
|
bopkins
|
|
response 189 of 680:
|
Aug 12 18:06 UTC 1997 |
And if I had thought of it?
|
bikeman
|
|
response 190 of 680:
|
Aug 13 02:42 UTC 1997 |
Are you implying something, orinoco? Whould you like me to leave? Am I not
welcome?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 191 of 680:
|
Aug 13 02:47 UTC 1997 |
Did I ever say it was you who wasn't welcome? Couldn't it just as well be
bopkins? Or even myself?
|
bopkins
|
|
response 192 of 680:
|
Aug 14 00:11 UTC 1997 |
Or could it be that we are all welcome?
|
toking
|
|
response 193 of 680:
|
Aug 14 01:13 UTC 1997 |
does one actice item keep a confrence from getting killed?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 194 of 680:
|
Aug 14 16:43 UTC 1997 |
Haven't there been times when there haven't been any active items?
Have you heard of the 'safety' conference?
|
toking
|
|
response 195 of 680:
|
Aug 14 20:30 UTC 1997 |
whats the safety confrence?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 196 of 680:
|
Aug 15 01:28 UTC 1997 |
Would that imply that you haven't heard of the least active conference of all
time?
|
bikeman
|
|
response 197 of 680:
|
Aug 15 01:33 UTC 1997 |
Isn't there other inavtive conferences out there?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 198 of 680:
|
Aug 15 15:24 UTC 1997 |
Did I say it was the *only* incative conference?
Didn't you hear me call it the *least active* conference?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 199 of 680:
|
Aug 15 15:25 UTC 1997 |
And what's an invative conference, anyway?
|
bopkins
|
|
response 200 of 680:
|
Aug 15 20:24 UTC 1997 |
Doesn't anyone know how to spell inactive?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 201 of 680:
|
Aug 17 02:04 UTC 1997 |
Would an invative conference be midway between an inactive conference and an
invasive conference?
|
bikeman
|
|
response 202 of 680:
|
Aug 23 04:11 UTC 1997 |
What does invasive mean? Am I the only one here that doesn't know?
|