You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-196   
 
Author Message
22 new of 196 responses total.
janc
response 175 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 23 19:54 UTC 1996

Rane is right that most of the people now running Grex have very litle
ambition to do anything more than run the system. There really is no high and
mighty ideals, aside from those implicit in the idea of a mostly open, mostly
free system.  I personally am content with that.

(Of course, many of the staff also pursue other forms of community service
in the context of other organizations).

But we will never solve th hardware and software problems.

I think we'll run up on the question of "mission" more when more of us start
wondering if we want Grex to continue to grow.
robh
response 176 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 23 20:50 UTC 1996

Yes, I have plenty of work with the other organizations I volunteer
for, without adding on more Grex stuff for myself to do.
scott
response 177 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 23 21:09 UTC 1996

Hmmmm.... if these statistics mean that davel and popcorn have too much time
on their hands, I wonder what it says about kerouac?

It's still pretty interesting.  As usual, I'm suprised to be as high on the
list as I am.
adbarr
response 178 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 00:25 UTC 1996

YOUaresurprised?IamnotgoingtobesoactivehereanymorewheneverywordItypegetsreport
edbysomecomputer!
scg
response 179 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 02:34 UTC 1996

I'msorrytohearthatArnold.
(one possible translation of my above sentence: I'm sorry to he art hat,
Arnold.  I'm sure most of you can come up with a better translation than that,
though. ;)  )


The purpose of Cyberspace Communications, Inc., as I see it at this point,
is to keep teh system running technically, and let the content take care of
itself.  That seems to be working pretty well, so far.
rcurl
response 180 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 07:32 UTC 1996

But don't forget that the purposes of CCI are defined its its Articles
of Incorporation, even if they are not being observed very well. I have
observed that it is almost impossible to implement them for lack of 
sufficient interest, but they are still there, in writing. It is cavalier
to say that that does not matter.
chelsea
response 181 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 12:47 UTC 1996

Rane, I don't think we're ignoring Grex's AOI as much as fulfilling them. 
Providing Grex as a free open forum *is* our mission.  And as long as we
continue to foster discussion on a wide range of topics we're doing a good
job. 


The Articles of Incorporation can be found at :
/usr/local/grexdoc/archives/AOI

Article 2, the purpose, goes like this:

         The Corporation is organized for such charitable and
 educational purposes as may qualify it for exemption from the
 federal income tax under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal
 Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (or the corresponding
 provisions of any future United States internal revenue law.)
 More specifically, such purposes include, but are not limited
 to, the advancement of public education and scientific
 endeavor through interaction with computers, and humans via
 computers, using computer conferencing. Further purposes
 include the exchange of scientific and technical information
 about the various aspects of computer science, such as
 operating systems, computer networks, and computer
 programming.

rcurl
response 182 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 24 16:46 UTC 1996

So - you now feel that Grex is fully entitled to 501(c)3 federal tax
exempt status?
chelsea
response 183 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 25 01:29 UTC 1996

We may be qualified or we may not.  But either way I don't
think having that status would be good for Grex.
rcurl
response 184 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 25 04:59 UTC 1996

That must then mean that fullfilling Grex's AOI would be bad for Grex?
mdw
response 185 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 25 19:32 UTC 1996

The mission statement in the AOI is not intended to describe all of the
things grex must or must not do, but was instead intended to describe a
superset of the activities we hoped Grex would in the future be able to
do.  Which subset we actually fulfill was by design left up to the
membership.  It should not come as much of a surprise that staff spends
most of its time worrying about how to fulfill the subset, and not much
time worrying about which subset it should be fulfilling.  Most of the
staff are also long-time members, and are hard at work making the
subsets they care about into reality.  Worrying about changing that
subset is properly speaking, the whole function of this conference.
chelsea
response 186 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 01:58 UTC 1996

I think Grex can try to fit the model of a 501(c)3 organization
and be a pretty darn good open access computer system without
actually being granted that status.  And I have never said I don't
think Grex could get 501(c)3, more like I hope it wouldn't.  


If some Grexers want to go out and built homes for the homeless
or provide computer access for shut-ins or offer a summer computer
camp for cyberclueless kids, great!  No kidding, it would be 
wonderful and I'm sure they'd have a lot of support and encouragement
for fellow Grexers.

I just don't see that type of activity as critical to Grex's
mandate or something we should be ashamed of not doing.
Maybe you hooked up with the wrong organization?
srw
response 187 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 03:22 UTC 1996

I agree with Mary about all of that except that I think that the
501(C)(3) status would be good for Grex.
rcurl
response 188 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 07:27 UTC 1996

Please explain "hooked up with the wrong organization". Isn't everyuone's
opinion allowed here? The question could be turned right back to you - but
it doesn't make any more sense that way. The rest of the arguments we have
been through before recently enough not to rehash. 

chelsea
response 189 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 14:18 UTC 1996

Of course everyone's opinion is appropriate here - I've not said
otherwise.  And of course my comment about being "hooked up with the wrong
organization" doesn't work when turned back toward me. 

Under (what I interpret as) Grex's mandate, almost everyone who
participates here is fostering Grex's purpose to one degree or another. 
And I think that's just great.  And if someone wants to go the extra and
develop a program (like the computer rehab project), well, that fits under
our mandate nicely.  But that type of a program isn't our primary
function.  Our primary function is keeping Grex up and running and open to
all as a viable forum of enriching communication.

So, agreeing to that, we have both hooked with the right organization. 
Under what I think is your perspective (that we must do more specialized
projects in order to fulfill our purpose) very few of us have made the
right choice.  And you must be very frustrated indeed if you're 
expecting that *priorities* will shift to these other projects.
rcurl
response 190 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 21:49 UTC 1996

No - I realize that people are dong here what they want to do. But the door
is open for fulfilling the opportunity Grex offers for more support of
communty interests. It just needs the people - and the active support of
the users, members and board to encourage and assist such activities (even
while everyone is doing just what they like to do). The "keeping Grex
up and running and open..." etc function is just technie stuff. The question
is what uses can that be put to to improve our community and lives. 
sidhe
response 191 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 23:49 UTC 1996

        And what does this have to do with queques?  Rane, you cannot
enforce enthusiasm or demand participation from people in an environment
such as this. If there aren't people doing these things, that is just too
bad. I mean, honestly, how do you plan on making these disinterested
people DO the things you speak of? We can ask politely if anyone is
interested in filling a post, but we certainly can't go blaming people who
honestly feel that it doesn't interest them, or that they do not have the
time to spend as the driving force behind some "community-enriching" 
service. As a matter of fact, getting on them about it is only going to
lead to disgruntlement amongst those who otherwise play other, if less
signigant roles, here. I'd much rather have ten content people all running
at their most comfortable level of involvement in my community than five
stressed-out go-getters, and five once-members, who left because someone
wasn't happy with what they were comfortable doing. 


        And I still want to know what the bloody hell this all has to do
with queques! 

chelsea
response 192 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 27 02:31 UTC 1996

Rane, I think you underestimate the users.  The staff may keep the
hardware and the software chugging away but it is indeed the members and
the users who are "keeping Grex up and running and open to all as a viable
forum of enriching communication."  Without the users Grex is just
hardware.  And without financial support we aren't even that.

And pardon me, sidhe, but I see this as a worthwhile point to make.
And you can get your panties in a bunch until it hurts and I'll 
still say my piece.  (I never brake for temper tantrums.) ;-)

chelsea
response 193 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 27 03:24 UTC 1996

This response has been erased.

chelsea
response 194 of 196: Mark Unseen   Jul 27 03:40 UTC 1996

Oh, I meant to answer Rane's last question.  "What uses can [Grex] be
put to to improve our community and lives?"  Well, Grex is an incredible
vehicle for folks from all over the country (and the world) to get
together and learn something of each other and share ideas.  Grex not
only facilitates communication - it teaches folks how it's done.

I'm sure there are other things we could do.  But even if we don't I think
Grex will have accomplished something quite special and worthwhile. 

mta
response 195 of 196: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 04:45 UTC 1996

What uses can [Grex] be put tomto improve our community and lives?

Gee, I think that we may have an award winning track record for socializing
overly-bright, overly curious young people who want and need and challenge
but until they come here, are mainly bored and dabbling in "trouble-making".
Somehow thewy they seem to ensd up being vrery productive net citizens and
beloved GREX users.

That's a community service I'm extremely proud of!
arthurp
response 196 of 196: Mark Unseen   Aug 10 00:38 UTC 1996

And how.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-196   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss