|
Grex > Helpers > #123: Grex System Problems - Fall 2003 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 291 responses total. |
rcurl
|
|
response 172 of 291:
| 
Nov 20 16:38 UTC 2003 |
I have been a supporter of Grex in the past by having several small
non-profit organizations with which I have been associated join Grex and
use it at least as their website and board mail reflector. The latter,
however, has become untenable because of spam. There is nearly ten times
more spam being distributed to the boards than board correspondence. Is
there any hope of soon having access to a filter here for spam? I will
probably move an organization off Grex (and thereby cancel membership)
unless there is some recourse against this avalanche of junk e-mail.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 173 of 291:
|
Nov 21 17:51 UTC 2003 |
} #233 of 233: by Rane Curl (rcurl) on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 (11:18):
} Could Grex use the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) to block spam? See
} http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/howtouse.html
|
rcurl
|
|
response 174 of 291:
|
Nov 21 18:06 UTC 2003 |
(Gag...I did it again - entered that item in oldagora. I always scan
oldagora before agora, and have been forgetting where I am.... thanks
Joe, for bringing it over.)
|
gelinas
|
|
response 175 of 291:
|
Nov 25 19:35 UTC 2003 |
From the previous agora:
} #234 of 234: by Joshua (jhudson) on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 (10:33):
} We will have to put a kludge in it as cyberspace.org sometimes ends
} up on various spamblock lists. Might be worth considering though.
|
naftee
|
|
response 176 of 291:
|
Nov 30 01:09 UTC 2003 |
Help! Jan Wolter's test backtalk site is nonexistant!
|
dcat
|
|
response 177 of 291:
|
Nov 30 05:01 UTC 2003 |
Help! Jim Daloonik's forebrain is nonexistant!
|
other
|
|
response 178 of 291:
|
Nov 30 20:53 UTC 2003 |
HAHAHAHAHAHA-SPLONK@! <lmao>
|
willcome
|
|
response 179 of 291:
|
Nov 30 22:57 UTC 2003 |
AHAHANH DCAT"S FORESKIN IS NONEXISTANT! AHAHAHaha
GOOD ONE< OTHER
|
naftee
|
|
response 180 of 291:
|
Dec 1 03:48 UTC 2003 |
AHAHAHAHAH DCAT"S GOT SOME FORESHORTENING IN HIS DICK AHAHAHAHA () WHAT A
SPANKER>
|
willcome
|
|
response 181 of 291:
|
Dec 1 03:51 UTC 2003 |
AHAHAHa
|
other
|
|
response 182 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:05 UTC 2003 |
FOAD
|
willcome
|
|
response 183 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:06 UTC 2003 |
TOAD!
AHAHAha
|
naftee
|
|
response 184 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:09 UTC 2003 |
SMOTHER MY MOTHER, OTHER! AHAHAHAA
|
willcome
|
|
response 185 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:10 UTC 2003 |
AHAHAHA!
|
naftee
|
|
response 186 of 291:
|
Dec 1 04:14 UTC 2003 |
BUNCHA _ HOOLIGANS THESE GUYS
root Operator Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
woot STeve Andre's root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
gcoot Greg Cronau's root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
noot Scott Helmke's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
hoot Rob Henderson's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
zoot Valerie Mates's root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
joot John Remmers' root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
loot Mike O'Leary's root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
moot Mic's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
foot Marcus Watt's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
soot Steve Weiss's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
coot Jan Wolter's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
scoot Steve Gibbard's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
doot Daniel Gryniewicz's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
koot Jeff Kaplan's Root Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003
|
gull
|
|
response 187 of 291:
|
Dec 1 15:20 UTC 2003 |
w00t
|
null
|
|
response 188 of 291:
|
Dec 1 19:38 UTC 2003 |
I was getting this earlier when logging in with ssh:
Server refused to allocate pty
Warning: no access to tty; thus no job control in this shell...
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
stty: TCGETS: Operation not supported on socket
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
There were approximately 39 people on at the time.
|
scott
|
|
response 189 of 291:
|
Dec 1 20:49 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, that just happens now and then. Often when Grex is heavily loaded.
|
gull
|
|
response 190 of 291:
|
Dec 1 21:09 UTC 2003 |
You'll get 'refused to allocate pty' any time there's a telnet queue.
Will NextGrex still be restricted this way, or will we be ditching the
telnet queue when we move?
|
null
|
|
response 191 of 291:
|
Dec 1 22:23 UTC 2003 |
I thought the telnet queue starts much higher than around 39 users.
Isn't it around 80?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 192 of 291:
|
Dec 1 23:18 UTC 2003 |
Seventy-two. However, there seem to be certain circumstances that will create
a queue with fewer than seventy users logged on.
|
naftee
|
|
response 193 of 291:
|
Dec 3 04:15 UTC 2003 |
GreX IS THE DEVIL!!!
bash-2.05$ uptime
11:15pm up 49 days, 13:13, 42 users, load average: 6.66, 5.90, 5.60
|
willcome
|
|
response 194 of 291:
|
Dec 3 04:50 UTC 2003 |
HEAL!
|
gull
|
|
response 195 of 291:
|
Dec 3 14:48 UTC 2003 |
6.66, 1/100th of the beast?
|
naftee
|
|
response 196 of 291:
|
Dec 3 16:15 UTC 2003 |
It's the closest we could get.
|