You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-17   17-23         
 
Author Message
7 new of 23 responses total.
gull
response 17 of 23: Mark Unseen   Sep 30 13:37 UTC 2003

Re #15: Good question.  I think interpreting it as some kind of
political statement would be crediting Fox News with way too much
subtlety though. ;)
sj2
response 18 of 23: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 08:57 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

sj2
response 19 of 23: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 08:58 UTC 2003

Ummm ... that would imply thought behind action. Something, you can't 
accuse Fox of.

willcome
response 20 of 23: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 07:28 UTC 2003

whore.
naftee
response 21 of 23: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 00:30 UTC 2003

whack.
dcat
response 22 of 23: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 01:34 UTC 2003

re resp:16 : corporations *are* considered to be individuals --- in certain
applications of law, corporations are equivalent to people.

But usually, 'private individual' is used to distinguish between 'ordinary
citizens' and celebrities, who may have very public existences.
twenex
response 23 of 23: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 03:51 UTC 2003

Yes, in fact one of the (very few) innovations in the
so-called European Union "Constitution" (which makes the
Articles of Confederation look like a paragon of brevity,
exactness, and utility) is to give the EU real legal
"personality" for the first time. If it passes...

(The EU has survived on the back of a ton of Treaties thus
far).
 0-17   17-23         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss