| You are not logged in. Login Now | register | search | |||||||||
|
| |||
| Author | Message | ||
| 7 new of 23 responses total. | |||
|
gull |
Re #15: Good question. I think interpreting it as some kind of political statement would be crediting Fox News with way too much subtlety though. ;) | ||
|
sj2 |
This response has been erased.
| ||
|
sj2 |
Ummm ... that would imply thought behind action. Something, you can't accuse Fox of. | ||
|
willcome |
whore. | ||
|
naftee |
whack. | ||
|
dcat |
re resp:16 : corporations *are* considered to be individuals --- in certain applications of law, corporations are equivalent to people. But usually, 'private individual' is used to distinguish between 'ordinary citizens' and celebrities, who may have very public existences. | ||
|
twenex |
Yes, in fact one of the (very few) innovations in the so-called European Union "Constitution" (which makes the Articles of Confederation look like a paragon of brevity, exactness, and utility) is to give the EU real legal "personality" for the first time. If it passes... (The EU has survived on the back of a ton of Treaties thus far). | ||
|
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In |
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss