|
Grex > Oldcoop > #370: Nominations for the 2007 Grex Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 236 responses total. |
nharmon
|
|
response 163 of 236:
| 
Dec 29 21:18 UTC 2006 |
I believe it was Steve that came in 4th place if you look again. And in
either case, I do believe that a special election should occur.
|
keesan
|
|
response 164 of 236:
|
Dec 29 21:47 UTC 2006 |
I would prefer to have a new election. The board can still convene minus one
member. Remmers, thanks for all your good work.
|
slynne
|
|
response 165 of 236:
|
Dec 29 21:55 UTC 2006 |
I am really sorry to see you go, remmers. But I can understand
completely why you want to take a break. I am glad that you still plan
to be active here.
|
cross
|
|
response 166 of 236:
|
Dec 29 22:57 UTC 2006 |
Nate is Right; Steve came in 4th.
|
spooked
|
|
response 167 of 236:
|
Dec 29 23:45 UTC 2006 |
Thanks remmers.
|
tod
|
|
response 168 of 236:
|
Dec 30 00:15 UTC 2006 |
Sorry to see you go, R E M M E R (S). (Perhaps you need thicker skin? j/k!)
|
cross
|
|
response 169 of 236:
|
Dec 30 00:16 UTC 2006 |
D'oh!
|
cyklone
|
|
response 170 of 236:
|
Dec 30 00:32 UTC 2006 |
Thanks for everything remmers. And feel free to keep posting on mnet no matter
what others say.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 171 of 236:
|
Dec 30 02:57 UTC 2006 |
I have to say that remmers is one of the people on here who I have a
great deal of respect for and while I regret he is stepping down, I'm
thankful for the service he has given thus far.
|
spooked
|
|
response 172 of 236:
|
Dec 30 03:21 UTC 2006 |
Thick/thin remmer's skin, he could be doing this nobly in the best
interests of Grex. I'm willing to lend him that benefit-of-doubt.
Hopefully, the dynamic duo will be looking at themselves seriously now
also.
|
keesan
|
|
response 173 of 236:
|
Dec 30 03:40 UTC 2006 |
I think remmers got tired of your complaints.
|
spooked
|
|
response 174 of 236:
|
Dec 30 04:20 UTC 2006 |
Oh, I was not complaining, for the record. I was stating things as I and
others I know saw them. I also tried not to get personal. In fact, it
can be shown that I did not (initiate) attack (on) remmers personally.
On the contrary, he was rather stabbing of my efforts to contribute
technically, and even more so in the fact I unselfishly was determined to
highlight the political quadmire that Grex has got itself into. What
pissed me much more though, was his completely unreasonable appraisal of Dan.
Hopefully the dynamic duo will be reading this (though, I doubt that
very much - unless, of course, they have been tipped off) and have some
decency in stepping down.
|
tsty
|
|
response 175 of 236:
|
Dec 30 06:24 UTC 2006 |
ouch - thankxx remmers for all the help over all those years.
i'm sad to see you resign. be good or have fun.
|
naftee
|
|
response 176 of 236:
|
Dec 30 06:50 UTC 2006 |
thanks remmers !
be sure to keep entering crazy items on m-net with those subliminal messages
dealing with your resignation
or something
|
nharmon
|
|
response 177 of 236:
|
Dec 30 12:41 UTC 2006 |
LOL! I find it funny that Sindi of all people would start the pointing
fingers "he resigned because you complained too much" given her
expectations of staff and the relentless complaints she has made of
spam, etc.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 178 of 236:
|
Dec 30 14:04 UTC 2006 |
Unintended humor is great.
|
spooked
|
|
response 179 of 236:
|
Dec 30 22:11 UTC 2006 |
Sindi is an ironic type of lady - got to love 'em :)
|
keesan
|
|
response 180 of 236:
|
Dec 30 23:38 UTC 2006 |
Sindi was not being ironic.
|
spooked
|
|
response 181 of 236:
|
Dec 31 00:16 UTC 2006 |
*giggles* :)
|
jadecat
|
|
response 182 of 236:
|
Dec 31 00:21 UTC 2006 |
I'm really sorry to read about your resignations Remmers, but it's
definitely understandable.
|
krokus
|
|
response 183 of 236:
|
Dec 31 01:28 UTC 2006 |
wow... I wish I would have read this before the Grexlunch today.
John, thanks for the efforts over the years.
|
spooked
|
|
response 184 of 236:
|
Dec 31 01:50 UTC 2006 |
This is a defining moment in the history of Grex. If we can get some
fresh, keen, enthusiastic blood on the board - and, especially staff, Grex
may survive (BUT more importantly GROW).
If the dynamic duo can realise they have the power to make a difference,
they should also do the noble deed.
|
keesan
|
|
response 185 of 236:
|
Dec 31 01:54 UTC 2006 |
Would you please stop talking in cliches? Try saying what you said in half
the words.
|
spooked
|
|
response 186 of 236:
|
Dec 31 03:17 UTC 2006 |
Sindi: I could try, however it's what comes naturally :)
Afterall, how do you think I got a PhD? :P
|
spooked
|
|
response 187 of 236:
|
Jan 1 20:39 UTC 2007 |
I move that Dan (cross) and myself (spooked) be re-admitted to staff.
I also move that no staffer can blazarringly revoke root privileges unless
there is irrefutable intention from a staffer to harm Grex. If a staffer
blazarringly revokes another staffer's root privileges, that staffer
should be punished by removing his/her (the blazarringly revoking) root
privileges and not being allowed back on staff for a minimum 12 month
period.
|