You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   137-161   162-186   187-211 
 212-236   237-261   262-286   287-311   312-336   337-361   362-386   387-411   412-432 
 
Author Message
25 new of 432 responses total.
kingjon
response 162 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 02:06 UTC 2006

Ah, yes, the distinction between veneration/adoration and worship. I'd
forgotten about that. Thanks for the reference!

fudge
response 163 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 10:34 UTC 2006

The cross has been used as a religious symbol long before Christ. Ref.
Dyonisus/Bacchus who was identified by feats such as being born of a virgin
and resurrecting after being transfixed to a tree...
klg
response 164 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 11:46 UTC 2006

"Non Christians are beaten over the head"  Well, that explains a lot, 
RW.  I've heard those injuries are nasty.
richard
response 165 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 15:58 UTC 2006

re #160 yes thats true and its also true that Christianity didn't start 
spreading widely until more than a hundred years after the events in 
question.  Before that Christianity basically had the status of a cult 
with only a small band of loyal followers.  We as a civilization have 
always responded to images more than words.  History is filled with "cults 
of personality" where people responded to images of their leaders.  The 
images, painted and otherwise, of Jesus are very important in depicting 
him as a real person.  Ironic isnt it that the images we know now of Jesus 
were painted by people hundreds of years after the fact who never knew 
him, if he existed, nor what he looked like.  Sonebody just decided, "I 
bet he was a long haired guy with a beard and a nice peaceful look"
edina
response 166 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 16:27 UTC 2006

They would have gone with Charles Manson with the swastika carved in his
forehead, but early screening groups were a bit put off.
bru
response 167 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 16:32 UTC 2006

you forget the shroud of Turin.
jep
response 168 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 16:44 UTC 2006

I saw a cartoon in the Adrian Daily Telegram from yesterday, with a TV 
newsman reporting something like "15,000 atheists stormed the offices 
of a newspaper when 12 blank sheets of paper were spotted on the desk 
of a cartoonist".
rcurl
response 169 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 17:56 UTC 2006

C-14 dating of the shroud of Turin give dates of AD 1260 - 1390. 
http://www.shroud.com/nature.htm

It is also important to realize that most people of that era were wrapped for
burial. Evidence for wounds can have many explanations. 
tod
response 170 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 17:57 UTC 2006

Its also possible that some dirty Italian used it after his semi annual bath.
happyboy
response 171 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 18:12 UTC 2006

"Luigi!! NOT MY FINE LINEN!!!"
tod
response 172 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 18:28 UTC 2006

Ass Crack of Turin
richard
response 173 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 18:34 UTC 2006

re #167 The Shroud of Turin has been exposed as almost certainly a hoax.  They
have confirmed methods for how it was likely done in the time it was done.
richard
response 174 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 18:38 UTC 2006

the commonly accepted depictions of Jesus portray him as a white caucasian,
like your average european.  wonder why.  In fact studies indicate that Jesus,
if he existed, was likely not caucasian but of a darker skinned complexion
common to semitics of that era.
khamsun
response 175 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 18:39 UTC 2006

well everybody will agree Jesus was a semitic guy, probably looking like
one of the guys seen in palestinian crowds.At that time Mohammed wasn't
born, and the israelis that lives at the place now didn't.
These days he'd be arrested by most cops...and rabbis would probably
still try to get rid of him ...
think about it next time Dubya Imperator says on TV "God save my money" 
:-)
nharmon
response 176 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 19:14 UTC 2006

<nharmon cues up Everlast - Black Jesus>
tod
response 177 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 19:15 UTC 2006

I'm fairly certain Moses was similar to Sherman Hemsley and they both sang
"Movin on Up"
albaugh
response 178 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 22:20 UTC 2006

richard, learn to read and comprehend English.  These are your words:

> the Christian world, where the image of Jesus on the
> cross is a key of the faith.

The image is *NOT* a "key of the faith".  Maybe it is a good "marketing tool",
but that's not what you wrote, is it?
happyboy
response 179 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 22:26 UTC 2006

only when it's on a keychain.

apparently richard doesnt know much about quakers
j. witnesses, etc

richard...do you think all xtians are of the charismatic
catholic or promise keeper/ dobson dominionist retard school?

you should get out of your apt building more
richard
response 180 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 22:33 UTC 2006

re #178 if it is a good marketing tool, a great marketing tool, it is in MY
OPINION, a key to the faith.  Albaugh I am entitled to that opinion and you
are entitled to disagree.
happyboy
response 181 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 22:35 UTC 2006

when was the last time you say a quaker
waving aroung a crucifix, dickiebird?
rcurl
response 182 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 03:08 UTC 2006

Re #173: the web discussions appear to assume that *either* the SoT is the 
burial cloth of JC or a medieval hoax. However those are not the only 
alternatives. It could be a medieval burial cloth for a medieval person. 
Can you cite a site for absolutely certain evidence that the shroud was 
prepared with the purpose of being a hoax in medieval times rather than as 
being simply the shroud for a human body from that period? Certainly even 
if it is nothing more than the latter it could have subsequently be 
*claimed* to be the shroud for JC. Making such a claim would then be a 
hoax, but not the shroud itself.
bru
response 183 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 03:49 UTC 2006

actually, the latest report says the radio carbon dating test was flawed with
detrius from the middle ages caused by the fire that singed the corners with
silver.
rcurl
response 184 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 06:11 UTC 2006

Well, that is problematic. There are huge controversies over all aspects
of this. Would  you please cite a site giving well-documented and agreed upon
evidence for that alleged flaw in the C14 dating? There are sites that
ridicule the fire story. 
happyboy
response 185 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 09:55 UTC 2006

oh just let him believe.
tod
response 186 of 432: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 16:51 UTC 2006

They traced the mitochondria (maternal lineage) DNA back to Ireland.  Its
quite possible that its a Sean Penn's bath towel.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   137-161   162-186   187-211 
 212-236   237-261   262-286   287-311   312-336   337-361   362-386   387-411   412-432 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss