You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   136-160   161-185   186-203 
 
Author Message
25 new of 203 responses total.
keesan
response 161 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 20:17 UTC 2007

We get Win98 on lots of used hard drives and remove junk from it.
I am not going to spend time learning to run Windows emulated under linux just
for people who don't want to use linux.  I tried dosemu and it works badly
with the programs I wanted it for.  Does okay with a CAD program in xdosemu.
Would you like to put some minimal linux with Windows emulation on 500MB
drives for me to give away?
keesan
response 162 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 20:23 UTC 2007

How much space would linux with WINE require?  wineHQ has a Slackware 10.2
binary that should run on a 386 that is 10MB tgz - maybe it would fit but I
don't have Slackware 10.2 or want it.  Upgrading the glibc to use this binary
would require also changing the kernel and modules.  Not impossible and this
certainly takes less space than 150MB of Windows 98 itself.  I have 150MB free
space in the linux partition for the friend who wants WORD and linux/opera.
And only 50MB free in the Windows partition.  Thanks for the idea.
keesan
response 163 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 21:16 UTC 2007

I can't find a binary for anything older than Slackware 10.2.  Source is 11MB
bz2.  A list of supported applications includes WORD97 and 2000.
cross
response 164 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 21:37 UTC 2007

Regarding #161; Err, that's kind of illegal.
maus
response 165 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 23:48 UTC 2007

Can you give me a bit more information about the boxes besides the max
drive size? Are the PCI-based? What brand of NIC do they use? I may be
able to throw together a nice image that you can toast onto a bunch of
CF cards or small drives, and be done. I will probably base it off of a
standard version of Slack 11 or something else "normal" and
well-known/well-supported. 
twenex
response 166 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 00:33 UTC 2007

Now Jeff understands that Sindi needs to install Windows for some users, but
agrees at least provisionally with Dan that the way Sindi is "procuring" Win98
at least MAY be illegal.

Jeff hopes Dan notices that Jeff has now started calling Dan "Dan," and is
pleased.

I am going to stop the irritating parodic third-person nonsense now.
cross
response 167 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 00:59 UTC 2007

Dan notices and Dan appreciates.  And now I will also knock off all the 3rd
Party nonsense.
nharmon
response 168 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 01:30 UTC 2007

Sindi might not think she is doing any harm pirating Windows for people
but the fact is Microsoft regularly goes after people who do so. How
they do it is offer free copies of properly licensed Windows in exchange
for the names and addresses of the people who install the pirated software.
edina
response 169 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 01:47 UTC 2007

re 167  Brooke would like it better if Dan started referring to 
himself as "The Dan".  
cross
response 170 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 02:06 UTC 2007

Sort of like, ``The Donald''?

``Rosie's a slob!''
edina
response 171 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 02:12 UTC 2007

Exactly!!  Please Jesus let your hair be better.....
cross
response 172 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 02:12 UTC 2007

Oh yes; don't worry, my hair is better than The Donald's comb-over.
keesan
response 173 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 03:40 UTC 2007

Re 165 (?) from maus  Are you offering to put together some small linux that
I can transfer via some external drive (I have a USB external drive and a 1GB
USB flash drive) that will run Opera and also WORD under WINE?  That fits in
500MB?  This particular computer has 2 PCI slots and I put a video card into
one of them (rather than dealing with an odd driver that I might have to
compile).  No network card.  Eventually an external modem.  I was told not
to put any more work into it right now.  It was supposed to be for the
to-be-ex-wife of a friend and we will see if she even wants to use the linux
part of it for the internet.  He says she is rarely satisfied with anything
he gives her.  He is delighted with the linux/opera I put on his computer.
By great good fortune he already has a Lucent modem in there which worked with
ltmodem.o driver.  My two lucent modems did not.  

If she does not like linux, I will let him put Win98 and WORD on the drive
after removing linux and enlarging the Win98 partition.
I installed Slackware 10.1 or 10.2 on one computer and it immediately filled
up at least 1GB in a minimal installation, and wasted 64MB of RAM on running
unneeded daemons.  It had several pages of config file for  X.  I am using
a generic Xvesa driver with no config file.  
cross
response 174 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 03:45 UTC 2007

(Her not being satisfied with things he gives her might have more to do with
the fact that she is a soon-to-be-ex-wife than that she is not satisfied with
those things.  And perhaps, vice versa.)
keesan
response 175 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 16:04 UTC 2007

Vice versa.  Today someone brought us 9 64MB and 4 128MB SIMMs so we could
actually put together computers with 128MB RAM and Ubuntu (if we had lots of
large hard disks - it demands 2GB) but Ubuntu is slower.  He also brought four
SIMMS (two labelled 64MB) that have two little slots very close to each other
just off of center, with no chips on two (just greenboard) and some metal
cased thing on the other two.  ???  And a no-name motherboard with onboard
i810 video sound and only three slots to replace them with.  No ISA and we
are out of extra external modems.  Anyone have 28.8K or 33.6K they don't want?
maus
response 176 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 19:32 UTC 2007

I will look into creating an image for this. In my past experience, the
basic load of Slackware was pretty small and light. If it has grown over
the years, you would be better off using a decently sized drive to
accomodate a reasonable distribution of Linux. 
keesan
response 177 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 20:13 UTC 2007

I am putting linux on the hardware that we have and do not want a distribution
of linux, just enough files to dial and run Opera.  The standard Slackware
puts on all sorts of unwanted things.  Wait on this project to see if the
person getting the latest computer really wants linux.  Why an image file
rather than a .tgz?  What kernel does the Slackware 11 glibc require?  The
glibc from Slackware 9.1 insisted on a kernel 2.4, which I have compiled.

A lot of the reason why the later kernels are larger is they support newer
hardware, and I am using Slackware 4 or earlier age hardware.  
cross
response 178 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 20:27 UTC 2007

The Linux pundits will tell you until they are blue in the face that the
kernel is actually very small and that all the support for newer hardware is
done via kernel modules; so supporting older systems in a small amount of
space is trivial: just delete the modules you don't need.

The reason you may want to do this is because giving someone Windows 98 and
Office 98 is illegal.
jep
response 179 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 21:27 UTC 2007

Dan: I refer to people by loginid because it is unique.  There are other
people here called "Dan" but no others called "cross".
cross
response 180 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 21:32 UTC 2007

That's fine, I guess.
keesan
response 181 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 00:07 UTC 2007

The kernel that comes with my linux is about 400K.  The standard Slackware
2.2.16 kernel is about 1GB.  How big is 2.6?  

The person getting the latest computer has their own OEM copies of 98 and
OFFICE.

The later libraries are a lot bigger. 
mcnally
response 182 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 02:00 UTC 2007

 re #181:  surely you mean 1MB, and not 1GB.

 on my Ubuntu laptop, my untrimmed kernel is about 1.2MB.

 mcnally@skookum:~$ ls -l /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-10-386
 -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1207281 2007-02-06 20:04 /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-10-386
keesan
response 183 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 03:50 UTC 2007

1MB, of course.  Is 2.6 less buggy than 2.4?
My custom kernel, with modular support for sound, framebuffer, usb, and scsi,
is 700K (2.4.31).  The generic kernel that came with my linux is 430K.
mcnally
response 184 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 06:47 UTC 2007

> Is 2.6 less buggy than 2.4?

I have no idea how to answer that.  Which version of 2.4?  
Which version of 2.6?  Which bugs?
keesan
response 185 of 203: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 15:45 UTC 2007

2.4.31, latest 2.6.  2.4.31 has a few problems.  Can't load usb_serial as a
module (has to be built-in).  Have to load gameport.o for some sound cards
to work even though it is not listed in modules.dep.  Why are you using 2.6?
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   136-160   161-185   186-203 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss