You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   136-160   161-185   186-210 
 211-235   236-248         
 
Author Message
25 new of 248 responses total.
jmsaul
response 161 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 02:22 UTC 2002

That you're using the board address to sign up for porn sites?  Could be...
other
response 162 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 02:37 UTC 2002

Well, that's what they tell me, but I just can't recall...
russ
response 163 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 05:32 UTC 2002

Re #159:  I was thinking of something more like putting new users
into a "no mail" (also no ftp, thus getting rid of donkey) group,
and giving people full privs if they become members, have an
identifiable USA presence or make a special request.  Existing
users would not be affected.

Getting rid of donkey might be worth the whole effort.
scott
response 164 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 14:01 UTC 2002

We disable accounts which do automated stuff anyway, so it's probably not as
big a problem as it appears.  The big edonkey problem was just excessive
clueless bots trying to connect, which somebody could do maliciously anyway.
mcnally
response 165 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 14:33 UTC 2002

  re #159:  

  > giving people full privs if they .. have an identifiable USA presence..

  I can't decide whether or not I'd like to hear your rationalization for
  this proposal or not..
mynxcat
response 166 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 16:13 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

gull
response 167 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 17:15 UTC 2002

Re #157: It's not mail *from* Grex that's the problem, it's mail *to* Grex.

The problem has eased up for me a bit, lately, though I do still
occasionally see mailing list mail arrive out of order (which indicates
a batch of it didn't go through on the first attempt.)
cmcgee
response 168 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 18:15 UTC 2002

yeah, I'm still getting reports about mail that bounced from my grex address.
From the AATA, so it shouldn't be spam filtered.
jlamb
response 169 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 00:12 UTC 2002

Hola, Why was grex down????????

was it because of the new backtalk update?
scott
response 170 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 00:15 UTC 2002

Grex was down because of some kind of power blip, apparently.
russ
response 171 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 02:29 UTC 2002

The modems were ringing open around 6 PM.  Dunno if this
was a Grex problem or a modem problem.
russ
response 172 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 13:00 UTC 2002

Re #165:  Mostly because it's likely that someone coming in
through our dialups is in the USA, and we could automagically
include IP blocks belonging to US ISPs if it became an issue.
India and Brazil are no worse off for computers than Ann Arbor
was when Grex was founded; let them follow our example.

Re #166:  What part of "or makes a special request" was obscure?

The point is to reduce Grex's mail load (and potential for abuse)
by adding a hoop to jump through before being able to add to the load.
Other sites are much better suited to handling it than we are.
keesan
response 173 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 15:22 UTC 2002

Are you suggesting that groups of people in India, making $80/month each if
they are lucky or nothing if they are students, get together and pay for a
fast internet connection?  Some of them have really slow connections right
now and Yahoo takes a lot longer to use than grex even at its worst.  Ever
had a chat with someone who types a sentence then you both wait 30 sec for
it to appear?
mcnally
response 174 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 16:49 UTC 2002

  re #172:  but I'm still not clear on why American users rate special
  privileges under your reasoning.  What is it that makes a user from
  Atlanta, GA, or Pierre, SD more desirable than one from Madras or
  Yogjakarta or Rio de Janeiro?
jazz
response 175 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 17:07 UTC 2002

        I think he's thinking in terms of "community service".

        There's nothing inherently wrong with the idea.  Community credit
unions won't give accounts to someone from Rio de Janeiro, either, if they
don't have local relatives, but there's nothing immoral about it.  It just
doesn't seem to be the way that GREX is set up to be.
mynxcat
response 176 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 17:26 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

krj
response 177 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 17:38 UTC 2002

Philosophical discussions about Grex, its community and its 
services need to be in SOME OTHER ITEM, not the System Problems report.
cmcgee
response 178 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 18:25 UTC 2002

Join Coop for a place to discuss the management of Grex.
mynxcat
response 179 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 18:31 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

russ
response 180 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 03:50 UTC 2002

The mail delays are pretty bad.  I received some e-mail at about 7:20 PM
which was sent at about 5:30 PM.
aruba
response 181 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 7 04:30 UTC 2002

I've seen worse than that, lately.  What's going on?
davel
response 182 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 19:06 UTC 2002

I've seen much worse than that.
keesan
response 183 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 18:08 UTC 2002

The original message was received at Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:08:17 -0500
from keesan@localhost

   ----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
<XXXX@bluegrass.net>  (unrecoverable error)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to mail.bluegrass.net.:
>>> RCPT To:<XXXX@bluegrass.net>  

[The XXXX's are mine to hide the personal address]

<<< 554 Service unavailable; Client host [216.93.104.34] blocked using
bl.spamcop.net; Blocked - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?216.93.104.34

Spamcop has a list of blocked IPs from which spam originates.  They take
you off the list after a week of no spams, I think.  Is there some way to
ask them to take grex off permanently and just send us a list of spammers
to delete their accounts instead?
keesan
response 184 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 18:24 UTC 2002

Here is what I got when I entered 216.93.104.34 into the form at spamcop -
10 reports of spam from grex, with a sampling of the originating
addresses, and a list of the many other times grex has been blacklisted
this year, sometimes for 1 minute, sometimes for 10 days.


   Query bl.spamcop.net - 216.93.104.34

   216.93.104.34 listed in bl.spamcop.net.
   216.93.104.34 Qty Most Recent Oldest
   Spam reports: 10 42.87 hours ago
   Sat Dec 7 23:21:19 2002 GMT 45.36 hours ago

     Rationale: Spam score 10.00: spam report ratio (10.000) exceeds
     threshold (0.020)

   Samples of reported spam:

   Reportid: 132139819 dated Sat Dec 7 23:12:51 2002 GMT
Return-Path: <tmobile@grex.cyberspace.org>
Received: from mb1i0.ns.pitt.edu (mb1i0.ns.pitt.edu [136.142.186.35])
          by imap.srv.cis.pitt.edu with ESMTP (8.8.8/8.8.8/cisimap-7.2.2.4)
          ID <SAA20065@imap.srv.cis.pitt.edu>;
          Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:12:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from grex.cyberspace.org ([216.93.104.34])
 by pitt.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #41462)
 with SMTP id <01KPRD2OSGBG004HJ1@mb1i0.ns.pitt.edu>; Sat,
 7 Dec 2002 18:12:51 EST
Received: from localhost (tmobile@localhost)
 by grex.cyberspace.org (8.6.13/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA20366; Sat,
 07 Dec 2002 18:08:14 -0500
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:08:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Kenneth <>
Subject: *** HOLIDAY SEASON SPECIALS FROM T-MOBILE ***
To: x
Message-id: <Pine_________________________________0000@grex.cyberspace.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Reportid: 123931890 dated
Sun Nov 10 09:16:13 2002 GMT
Status:  U
Return-Path: <admin9@cyberspace.org>
Received: from grex.cyberspace.org ([216.93.104.34])
        by killdeer (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id 18aOct1p33NZFlr0
        for <x>; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 01:16:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from admin9@localhost) by grex.cyberspace.org (8.6.13/8.6.12) id EAA
08366 for x; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 04:17:24 -0500
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 04:17:24 -0500
From: null <>
Message-Id: <2002_____________8366@grex.cyberspace.org>
To: x

[HERE IS A SUMMARY OF ALL THE TIMES GREX GOT ON THE SPAMCOP BLACKLIST]


Listing history:

listed: Sun Nov 25 13:33:01 2001 GMT
delisted: Mon Nov 26 09:20:01 2001 GMT

listed:  Sat Feb  9 08:22:01 2002 GMT
delisted: Sun Feb 10 03:57:01 2002 GMT

listed: Thu Apr 25 21:39:01 2002 GMT
delisted: Mon May  6 04:11:01 2002 GMT
[This was for a longer period]

listed: Sun Nov 10 09:34:02 2002 GMT
delisted:Wed Nov 13 09:48:01 2002 GMT
[This sounds like about the time I was unable to write my ISP.]

listed:Sat Dec  7 21:47:01 2002 GMT
delisted:Sat Dec  7 22:43:03 2002 GMT
[Delisted after one minute!]

listed: Sun Dec  8 00:54:02 2002 GMT

-----------

Grex has been on the blacklist since Sunday just after midnight.


Would it help to post this sort of info in the motd so people can expect
to get their mails bounced back and know when to resend them?
--------------

References
   6. http://spamcop.net/
gull
response 185 of 248: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 19:40 UTC 2002

Another note on the 'delayed email' conversation.  I just an email early
this afternoon that had been sent at 8 pm last night.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   136-160   161-185   186-210 
 211-235   236-248         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss