You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-16   16-40   41-65   66-90   91-115   116-140   141-163    
 
Author Message
25 new of 163 responses total.
jmsaul
response 16 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 22:08 UTC 2003

Depends on what you get.  The South Indian appetizers we had were good.  The
main dishes were uninteresting (and similar to each other).  The Naan is good.
krj
response 17 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 00:12 UTC 2003

((oops, I omitted krokus from the list of this week's lunchfolks in 
resp:14 so we had an even dozen there.))
mary
response 18 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 12 20:16 UTC 2003

I'm looking forward to hearing what folks thought of the
restaurant.  It would be nice to have another good Indian
food restaurant in Ann Arbor.  There is supposed to be
an extraordinary one somewhere in Bloomfield Hills or
Franklin (those suburbs all look alike to me), but I don't
recall the name or location.  

dcat
response 19 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 12 22:15 UTC 2003

I thought it was pretty good.  It was a little expensive though-- lunch buffet
was $9.50 after tax, but I thought well worth it.
jmsaul
response 20 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 12 22:45 UTC 2003

Re #18:  Possibly Priya, which is in one of the Bloomfields.  I can get you
         the location if you want.
aruba
response 21 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 13 03:49 UTC 2003

Carol liked it a whole lot, and I liked it too.
mary
response 22 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 13 13:17 UTC 2003

Re: #20  I don't think that's the restaurant my Indian friend
was raving about but I'm going to email her and ask.  Thanks for
the offer and I'd like to know where Priya is located.
jmsaul
response 23 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 13 15:24 UTC 2003

Priya Restaurant & Bar -   Phone: 248-6157700
36600 Grand River Ave, MI, 48335

I'd be interested in whatever restaurant your friend is talking about if it
isn't Priya.
mynxcat
response 24 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 15:52 UTC 2003

9.50 for a lunch buffet is pretty reasonable, especially since it was 
the weeken. In Columbus, a decent Indian lunch buffet on a weekend is 
usually $12.50, excluding tax
dcat
response 25 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 17:23 UTC 2003

I wasn't inclined to comment on the price initially, but others present
thought it was a lot.
edina
response 26 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 19:12 UTC 2003

That's about right by DC standards - and Indian food is pricey, so I usually
don't mind dropping the cash.
jaklumen
response 27 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 23:21 UTC 2003

resp:24 highway robbery-- *never* paid that in Bellevue or Yakima.  
More like 3/4 - 1/2 that.
i
response 28 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 15 00:53 UTC 2003

Isn't Raja Rani's lunch buffet still $7.00?  Not that it's huge/fancy/
fabulously presented, but it was good last i was there (Feb03).
dcat
response 29 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 15 01:23 UTC 2003

Dunno, but I had a chicken vindaloo from RR last night that was so thin it
bordered on watery.  (It was, i believe, abt $8.)
mynxcat
response 30 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 15 18:38 UTC 2003

I've been to one Indian restaurant in AA. Can't remember if it was 
Raja Rani. Left me sorely disappointed. 

It's funny that Indian food is so pricey. Don't see any reason for it 
to be. It's not like the ingredients are any more expensive than 
ingredients for other cuisines. That's why I never have India a la 
carte. Buffets or not at all.
mary
response 31 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 15 19:19 UTC 2003

I like both Shalimar and Raji Rani, but I think I've only been to about
four or five Indian restaurants, total, and all within the last ten years. 

In general I think the portions at Indian restaurants are more in line
with what's healthy and reasonable than what you'll get served at say,
Outback.  If you order a meat dish you get a little meat (maybe 4 or five
small pieces) in a moderate amount of sauce.  At first I too thought of
the sauce more as spicy gravy but now I like the way it's much thinner
than that.  It's not something you serve on top of rice but rather a
highly seasoned liquid that is absorbed by the accompanying rice.  There
is a difference.

Too, the service is often slower at Indian restaurants.  I've come to
appreciate that as forcing you to dine over time as opposed to flushing it
down. 

I'm also charmed by the somewhat less friendly waitstaff.  It's not
outright rude but it's not, "Hi, guys.  I'm Bambie and I'll be
serving you tonight."  Indian waitstaff aren't Bambies.

I was exposed to Indian food by my son, who found it while attending MSU. 
So I consider the cuisine an unanticipated dividend, if you will, of a
$60,000 growth and development fund. ;-)

furs
response 32 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 15 19:33 UTC 2003

Raja Rani is the Chi Chi's of Indian food.
slynne
response 33 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 15 21:17 UTC 2003

mmmm I like Raja Rani! But then, I like Chi Chi's too ;)
jaklumen
response 34 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 16 01:12 UTC 2003

resp:31 I think I understand-- I'm not sure I'd say 'less friendly'-- 
maybe 'more subdued'.  At least, this has been my experience.  Works 
for me.  I tend to love quiet, cozy restaurants that aren't too 
crowded and if the staff is rather calm and less... intense, it's 
rather nice.
other
response 35 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 16 02:25 UTC 2003

Shalimar lunch buffet.  Dig it.
mynxcat
response 36 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 16 12:26 UTC 2003

I think it was Shalimar I went to. They're ras malais are a shame, not what
ras malai should be. The food was sub-standard. Not the worst I've had, but
pretty close
mynxcat
response 37 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 16 12:40 UTC 2003

no, the restaurant was shahenshah, or something like it.
gull
response 38 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 16 14:05 UTC 2003

I've noticed that Indian food from restaurants in Michigan doesn't seem
to be as spicy as I'd normally expect it to be.  Maybe a concession to
Midwestern palates, which are used to blander food?
edina
response 39 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 16 14:34 UTC 2003

Well, that's quite depressing.
janc
response 40 of 163: Mark Unseen   Jul 16 15:04 UTC 2003

Probably Shehan Shah - which we happen to like a lot.  But then, I'm not
really that fond of Indian food.  It's OK.  Nice to have once in a while.
I even cook some vaguely Indian dishes.  But eating Indian food three days
running is more than I can stand.  I much prefer Mexican, Chinese, Ethiopean
or most anything else.  So I'm probably a poor judge of Indian food.  We
only eat a few things at Shehan Shah - Dal Makne, Palak Paneer, and Chana
Masala (probably all misspelled).  We hardly have to order anymore.  We've
known the staff a long time.
 0-16   16-40   41-65   66-90   91-115   116-140   141-163    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss