|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 186 responses total. |
crimson
|
|
response 157 of 186:
| 
Jan 31 15:37 UTC 2006 |
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
|
twenex
|
|
response 158 of 186:
|
Jan 31 15:45 UTC 2006 |
Indeed.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 159 of 186:
|
Jan 31 17:53 UTC 2006 |
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:10:24 -0500
From: CNN Breaking News <BreakingNews@MAIL.CNN.COM>
-- U.S. Senate votes to confirm Judge Samuel Alito
as the 110th Supreme Court justice
|
nharmon
|
|
response 160 of 186:
|
Jan 31 18:54 UTC 2006 |
Break out the cheeseballs to go with all of the congressional whining
we're about to endure.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 161 of 186:
|
Jan 31 19:51 UTC 2006 |
bye bye checks and balances...
hello unitary executive.
tic toc tic toc
|
gull
|
|
response 162 of 186:
|
Feb 1 08:44 UTC 2006 |
Lawmakers in five states have proposed abortion bans, presumably hoping
the new Supreme Court will uphold them.
|
klg
|
|
response 163 of 186:
|
Feb 1 12:00 UTC 2006 |
You are surprised at that?? It is likely that at least one "lawmaker"
in all 50 states has proposed an abortion ban. They can propose
whatever they want. The problem is getting the legislatures to pass
them. Proposing is a long way from enacting, let alone having them
upheld by the Supreme Court.
Another problem is that if an "abortion ban" goes through, the
Republicans will probably suffer large scale defeat.
|
twenex
|
|
response 164 of 186:
|
Feb 1 12:43 UTC 2006 |
Diddums.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 165 of 186:
|
Feb 1 12:48 UTC 2006 |
Never underestimate the power of the religious right. That being said, I
expect to see abortion become more restricted, but not banned outright.
|
tod
|
|
response 166 of 186:
|
Feb 1 17:03 UTC 2006 |
I thought it was cool that GW mentioned cloning, abortion, and faith based
initiatives in the SOTUA yesterday. I don't want to see any of you
non-Christians causing any of us trouble, ya hear?!
|
nharmon
|
|
response 167 of 186:
|
Feb 1 17:11 UTC 2006 |
Is it okay for us Christians to cause you trouble?
|
tod
|
|
response 168 of 186:
|
Feb 1 17:54 UTC 2006 |
Like Christians are organized when you get past the Jew idol worship and
capitalist holidays? There are so many different denominations that the only
thing Christian about this country is the use of the monicker when it wants
to justify itself for pissing on the Constitution.
|
twenex
|
|
response 169 of 186:
|
Feb 1 17:57 UTC 2006 |
Smirk.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 170 of 186:
|
Feb 1 18:34 UTC 2006 |
Is that a yes? :)
|
bru
|
|
response 171 of 186:
|
Feb 2 06:37 UTC 2006 |
You got it wrong, its the liberals who piss on the constitution.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 172 of 186:
|
Feb 2 14:15 UTC 2006 |
What?!
|
twenex
|
|
response 173 of 186:
|
Feb 2 14:26 UTC 2006 |
<twenex is rolling on the floor laughing> Good one, bruce!
|
nharmon
|
|
response 174 of 186:
|
Feb 2 16:04 UTC 2006 |
Its true.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 175 of 186:
|
Feb 2 16:05 UTC 2006 |
I think its sad when people become so partisan that they overstate the
opposing side's problems while understating their own.
|
twenex
|
|
response 176 of 186:
|
Feb 2 16:06 UTC 2006 |
Oh! The irony!
|
nharmon
|
|
response 177 of 186:
|
Feb 2 16:10 UTC 2006 |
?
|
gull
|
|
response 178 of 186:
|
Feb 2 16:59 UTC 2006 |
Generally you have to control some part of the government to get to do
any pissing.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 179 of 186:
|
Feb 2 17:15 UTC 2006 |
Well, the country didn't always have a republican presidency. And I do
see plenty of state governments run by democrats. I'm just saying you
lose credibility when you only criticise the other party, and not your own.
|
marcvh
|
|
response 180 of 186:
|
Feb 2 17:18 UTC 2006 |
Out of curiousity who is the "you" being addressed here?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 181 of 186:
|
Feb 2 17:36 UTC 2006 |
re #180: The Liberal Group Mind.
|