|
Grex > Oldcoop > #370: Nominations for the 2007 Grex Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 236 responses total. |
cmcgee
|
|
response 156 of 236:
| 
Dec 29 03:00 UTC 2006 |
Thanks, I'll still volunteer then *grin*
|
nharmon
|
|
response 157 of 236:
|
Dec 29 03:42 UTC 2006 |
Sindi reminds me of a former supervisor who would instruct us to call
AT&T every 20 minutes when a leased line went down. He felt that the
"squeaky wheel gets the grease" and the more we complained the more of a
priority we became. It had a negative effect. AT&T stopped escalating
tickets after they figured out we were asking for that on every single call.
Sindi, having the secretary contact staff on a weekly basis is not going
to be constructive. You should tone down your demands for everyone else,
we're talking about a lot of valuable time. I don't want staff to resent
the time they put in here.
|
tod
|
|
response 158 of 236:
|
Dec 29 04:51 UTC 2006 |
On the flip side, it would be nice to have some accountability and at least
know what staff is up to and what they are not up to. Maybe there is a
timeframe for reporting they'd agree to?
|
spooked
|
|
response 159 of 236:
|
Dec 29 10:42 UTC 2006 |
Staff put in time for staff work?
Seriously, that very rarely happens -- and, nor has it in the last couple
of years in fact. Whenever someone has a good idea (AND ACTUALLY WANTS TO
CONTRIBUTE!) it is repelled from the stunningly-appearing-out-of-nowhere
dynamic duo.
I can't see Grex moving forward without there being a change in the
mindset of the 'must run to Marcus/STeve for no ruffling feathers check'.
I have said this before. The problems on Grex are NOT technically
challenging. They are however political, and from this the only willing
people (and motivated to fix the problems) are discouraged and chased away
from doing so.
I hope you can finally realise this, if you have not by now! I'm not the
only former staff person who will tell you this. Some of them would not
even log in here anymore, because of the poor way they have been treated.
|
remmers
|
|
response 160 of 236:
|
Dec 29 17:41 UTC 2006 |
I am resigning from Grex board and staff, effective immediately.
Although I have been a staff member for over fifteen years and a board
member for roughly half of those, the recent tenor of discussions in
this conference have clarified for me that my heart is no longer in
it and that I must take a break from Grex governance and staff
responsibilities. My thanks to those who supported me in the recent
board election, and apologies for any inconvenience my decision may
cause. I do plan to continue as an active user and member of Grex.
Article 4c of the bylaws provides for a special election to fill
vacancies on the board. I presume that one of the first orders of
business of the new board will be to schedule such an election.
|
tod
|
|
response 161 of 236:
|
Dec 29 18:53 UTC 2006 |
Doesn't that make scholar your interim replacement since he came in fourth?
;)
|
cross
|
|
response 162 of 236:
|
Dec 29 20:33 UTC 2006 |
Given that Remmers resigned after being re-elected, but days before the
convening of the new board (and days before his old term on the board
expired), but after the election, I propose that we avoid another special
election and make scholar, who did come in 4th in the election, remmers's
replacement on the next board.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 163 of 236:
|
Dec 29 21:18 UTC 2006 |
I believe it was Steve that came in 4th place if you look again. And in
either case, I do believe that a special election should occur.
|
keesan
|
|
response 164 of 236:
|
Dec 29 21:47 UTC 2006 |
I would prefer to have a new election. The board can still convene minus one
member. Remmers, thanks for all your good work.
|
slynne
|
|
response 165 of 236:
|
Dec 29 21:55 UTC 2006 |
I am really sorry to see you go, remmers. But I can understand
completely why you want to take a break. I am glad that you still plan
to be active here.
|
cross
|
|
response 166 of 236:
|
Dec 29 22:57 UTC 2006 |
Nate is Right; Steve came in 4th.
|
spooked
|
|
response 167 of 236:
|
Dec 29 23:45 UTC 2006 |
Thanks remmers.
|
tod
|
|
response 168 of 236:
|
Dec 30 00:15 UTC 2006 |
Sorry to see you go, R E M M E R (S). (Perhaps you need thicker skin? j/k!)
|
cross
|
|
response 169 of 236:
|
Dec 30 00:16 UTC 2006 |
D'oh!
|
cyklone
|
|
response 170 of 236:
|
Dec 30 00:32 UTC 2006 |
Thanks for everything remmers. And feel free to keep posting on mnet no matter
what others say.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 171 of 236:
|
Dec 30 02:57 UTC 2006 |
I have to say that remmers is one of the people on here who I have a
great deal of respect for and while I regret he is stepping down, I'm
thankful for the service he has given thus far.
|
spooked
|
|
response 172 of 236:
|
Dec 30 03:21 UTC 2006 |
Thick/thin remmer's skin, he could be doing this nobly in the best
interests of Grex. I'm willing to lend him that benefit-of-doubt.
Hopefully, the dynamic duo will be looking at themselves seriously now
also.
|
keesan
|
|
response 173 of 236:
|
Dec 30 03:40 UTC 2006 |
I think remmers got tired of your complaints.
|
spooked
|
|
response 174 of 236:
|
Dec 30 04:20 UTC 2006 |
Oh, I was not complaining, for the record. I was stating things as I and
others I know saw them. I also tried not to get personal. In fact, it
can be shown that I did not (initiate) attack (on) remmers personally.
On the contrary, he was rather stabbing of my efforts to contribute
technically, and even more so in the fact I unselfishly was determined to
highlight the political quadmire that Grex has got itself into. What
pissed me much more though, was his completely unreasonable appraisal of Dan.
Hopefully the dynamic duo will be reading this (though, I doubt that
very much - unless, of course, they have been tipped off) and have some
decency in stepping down.
|
tsty
|
|
response 175 of 236:
|
Dec 30 06:24 UTC 2006 |
ouch - thankxx remmers for all the help over all those years.
i'm sad to see you resign. be good or have fun.
|
naftee
|
|
response 176 of 236:
|
Dec 30 06:50 UTC 2006 |
thanks remmers !
be sure to keep entering crazy items on m-net with those subliminal messages
dealing with your resignation
or something
|
nharmon
|
|
response 177 of 236:
|
Dec 30 12:41 UTC 2006 |
LOL! I find it funny that Sindi of all people would start the pointing
fingers "he resigned because you complained too much" given her
expectations of staff and the relentless complaints she has made of
spam, etc.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 178 of 236:
|
Dec 30 14:04 UTC 2006 |
Unintended humor is great.
|
spooked
|
|
response 179 of 236:
|
Dec 30 22:11 UTC 2006 |
Sindi is an ironic type of lady - got to love 'em :)
|
keesan
|
|
response 180 of 236:
|
Dec 30 23:38 UTC 2006 |
Sindi was not being ironic.
|