You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   131-155   156-180   181-205 
 206-230   231-255         
 
Author Message
25 new of 255 responses total.
janc
response 156 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 04:40 UTC 2000

I agree with Mary that posting an apology and/or correction is probably a
better course in general, and one I personally prefer.  I just don't think
it should be the only option available.
jmsaul
response 157 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 12:25 UTC 2000

Same here.
remmers
response 158 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 17:06 UTC 2000

Re #173: Right, a different venue, although I'm not so sure I have
the appetite to debate the general issues at this point in time.  So
I'll just say that I think the public interest includes encouraging
low-cost grass-roots public free speech forums like Grex and M-Net
to exist without excessive danger of legal liability on the part of
the management.
jmsaul
response 159 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 17:16 UTC 2000

I'd agree.  The best way to do that, though, is not to take a hardline point
of view against the user's individual interests like you're doing now.
orinoco
response 160 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 14 23:48 UTC 2000

Mary seems to have taught John her future-item-reading trick.  (It's odd,
you'd think she'd be fine with hiding the censored log, since she sees all
the posts ahead of time anyway.....)
mary
response 161 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 00:34 UTC 2000

You have to stop thinking about it in terms of having said and
going to say.  Conferencing is a little like a Mobius strip.
Or to put it another way, what comes around has gone around,
and if it looks familiar, you've got it now get over it.
remmers
response 162 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 11:27 UTC 2000

Re #159: Don't you mean "like *we* are doing now"?   :)

Mary's right.  Doing conferencing over a period of years is
sort of like watching various productions of "Hamlet".  The
costumes and scenery might change, but you can still predict
with uncanny accuracy what each and every character is going
to say and do.  I don't *quite* have it to the point where
I can forsee what response number a person's familiar
response will appear in, but I'm working on it.
jmsaul
response 163 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 11:34 UTC 2000

Then you already know I'll say this:  No, I meant like *you* are doing now.
I don't take any responsibility for, or ownership of, Grex's current policy
on scribbling.
md
response 164 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 15:26 UTC 2000

What Joe said.
remmers
response 165 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 13:19 UTC 2000

Re #163: I wasn't suggesting that you should take any responsibility
or ownership for the current policy, Mr. Needs To Lighten Up A Bit.
I was alluding to an observation I made earlier that participating
in discussions here makes you in a real sense a member of the
community.

If the policy gets changed, I'd *love* to see you claim that you
had no role in causing that to happen.  :)
jmsaul
response 166 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 13:49 UTC 2000

No, I wouldn't claim that.

slynne
response 167 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 18 21:42 UTC 2000

Well I would!
aruba
response 168 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 01:46 UTC 2000

Standard plug:  Anyone who'd like to have a role in determining this or
any other Grex policy should become a member of Grex.  Only members' votes
count in determining the outcome of a vote.  Type !support or go to
http://www.cyberspace.org/member.html for information on how to become a
member.
jmsaul
response 169 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 02:17 UTC 2000

The outcome of this vote may determine whether I bother.
remmers
response 170 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 15:24 UTC 2000

REMINDER:  The vote ends Thursday, June 22, at midnight (EDT).
remmers
response 171 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 22 16:32 UTC 2000

UPDATE:  Since Grex has been inaccessible via the net for a full
day, voting is extended at least through Friday, June 23 (possibly
longer, depending on how long the net connection remains down).
remmers
response 172 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 13:58 UTC 2000

ANOTHER UPDATE:  Grex was off the net for nearly three days,
so the vote is extended for three days past the original deadline.
Voting will end at midnight on Sunday, June 25 (EDT).  I'll
report the results as soon as feasible thereafter.
remmers
response 173 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 05:18 UTC 2000

The polls are now closed.  I'll report results when I've received
a definitive list of eligible voters from the treasurer.
remmers
response 174 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 05:44 UTC 2000

Okay, I've gotten the update I needed from Greg.  Here are the
results:

   33 members voted.  The totals are

        yes    14
        no     19

The motion failed.

(On a personal note, I'm somewhat surprised by this.  I had expected
the motion to pass.  So much for my ability to gauge the sentiments
of the body politic.)

The unofficial non-member vote went the other way:  57 yes, 33 no.
This was less of a surprise to me.
gypsi
response 175 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 07:43 UTC 2000

Exactly.  Most of the people who were in favor of it aren't members.
jmsaul
response 176 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 14:18 UTC 2000

Guess I'll never be a member, because I won't support any system that does
this to its members.  I'll be out of here permanently as soon as M-Net's back
up.
remmers
response 177 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 14:28 UTC 2000

Re #175:  Only about a third of the eligible voters bothered
to vote, despite extensive discussion and the fact that the
vote was well-publicized.  I don't know how it would have gone
if the turnout had been larger.

Re #176:  Sorry you feel that way, Joe.  I don't know quite what
to say, except that it was the members themselves who determined
the outcome on this one, not the "system".
jmsaul
response 178 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 14:36 UTC 2000

Doesn't matter to me.  It's an unethical stance for Grex to take, in my
opinion, and I won't be part of it.  I think you're right up there with
Web providers who assert ownership over their users' sites, and you should
be ashamed.

jep
response 179 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 14:53 UTC 2000

I'm pretty dismayed by this vote.  I agree with what seldon said about 
it being unethical for Grex to keep text public when the person who 
entered it tried to remove it.

At least the relevant 'help' commands for censor/scribble/expurgate/etc. 
now explain that the material is left in a publicly readable place.  
That's an improvement.  

I'm not going to say I'll never be a Grex member, not over this issue.  
Grex is not perfect, but it's worth supporting.  Hopefully this issue 
will be raised again in the not-distant future, and the system will be 
stable enough, and the members interested enough, to get it right the 
next time.
krj
response 180 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 14:57 UTC 2000

(... as unethical as pre-1991 M-net, a system which I'm sure you never
would have been a part of...   :)   )
 
I'm very sorry that you have that reaction, Joe.   Civilized politics
requires that one accept losses occasionally; the vote on this 
was low enough and close enough that a more useful response 
would be to become a voting member, and look to recruit more voting 
members who share your view.   I don't recall what the Grex rules
are on re-opening an issue, but I doubt the bylaws say that an issue 
can never be revisted.)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   131-155   156-180   181-205 
 206-230   231-255         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss