|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 8 new of 163 responses total. |
jaklumen
|
|
response 156 of 163:
|
Mar 16 11:11 UTC 2003 |
I have a little interest in home audio equipment, and I was friends
with someone who was really into car audio and competed with his
system. I guess when you get involved with that stuff, you start to
hear the differences.. you just have to be exposed to a lot of it.
I used to subscribe to Sound & Vision (which used to be Stereo
Review). It just blew my mind how these people could dissect the
sound, but then, they do it for a living.
|
dbratman
|
|
response 157 of 163:
|
Mar 17 07:45 UTC 2003 |
I wrote, "The kind of music I listen to, you notice the loss in
quality. Or at least I do." But I am not an equipment junkie! In
fact, I am still using the same 30-year-old off-the-shelf amp and
speakers I've had for, uh, 30 years.
It is simply that I am a classical listener, and you don't have to be
much of a classical listener to notice a degredation in sound quality.
Lots of instruments: all acoustic: it's sensitive to that.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 158 of 163:
|
Mar 17 12:58 UTC 2003 |
I suspect that that may be where I don't have the ear training to hear what
you hear. I have never been able to get into classical music. (Much as I
haven't been able to "get" jazz or any other type of music which is mostly
instrumental. I have a major voice bias in my musical tastes, and I tend to
listen to the words and get very impatient with long instrumental hiatuses.)
I also don't play any instrument, so I don't have that kind of training to
fall back on either.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 159 of 163:
|
Mar 18 05:45 UTC 2003 |
I'm not sure that's so much training as exposure.
|
gull
|
|
response 160 of 163:
|
Mar 18 14:19 UTC 2003 |
An article about a recent speech by departing RIAA chief Hilary Rosen:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/29797.html
It includes this bit of revisionist history by Rosen:
"The argument is that somehow the record companies seek to encroach upon
a consumer's ability to make a personal copy of music. Nonsense. We have
always been supportive of the ability of consumers to copy a CD for the
gym or for their car. More power to the music fan."
And a comment on the Verizon case, in which the RIAA tried to get the
names and addresses of peer-to-peer network users released without a
court order:
"Verizon has unfortunately turned this case into a bogus claim to
protect their members' privacy rights. Well first of all, there is no
right to commit a crime in private. And second and more importantly,
when you are on one of these p2p systems and have opened your hard drive
and its contents to the network, you have given away your own privacy."
She admitted publicly for the first time that the RIAA has been
inserting bogus files into peer-to-peer networks in an attempt to
frustrate users. She also all but admitted that the unlabelled
copy-protected CDs they tried to foist on us weren't the best idea:
"While the technology is apparently not quite ready, there is promise
for some protective technologies, which would offer consumers use of
their music on the computer and still prevent uploading onto the
Internet. While there are no specific plans to release such products
into the marketplace at this time, if they are produced, record
companies will need to work closely with retailers to assure that the
proper consumer education and labeling takes place."
|
dbratman
|
|
response 161 of 163:
|
Mar 19 01:21 UTC 2003 |
Twila: There's plenty of classical music that's vocal. Have you tried
listening to choral music? classical art song? opera?
|
anderyn
|
|
response 162 of 163:
|
Mar 19 13:01 UTC 2003 |
Um. Only a very little.
|
krj
|
|
response 163 of 163:
|
Mar 23 01:20 UTC 2003 |
"Replay TV maker Sonicblue to file for Chapter 11"
http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=2423476
Sonicblue has been the hardware maker most willing to introduce
innovative products and take the legal heat from the copyright
industry. They defended and won the copyright suit over the original
Rio MP3 player, and Sonicblue's win allowed all other makers of
MP3 players to get into the market. More recently they were
defending their ReplayTV video recorder in another copyright
infringement suit.
In a previous article which I don't have as a citation, it sounded
like the company was being dragged down by its legal expenses.
This seems like another step closer to the copyright industry
obtaining a defacto veto over the development of new technology.
The Rio and Replay hardware lines are to be sold to the Japanese
firm which runs the Denon and Marantz brands.
-----
This next item was widely reported this week. This quote is from the
ZDnet story:
"...the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sent letters
to about 300 companies providing evidence of specific instances of
their internal networks being used to swap copyrighted songs, and
warning of potential legal liability."
"RIAA turns up heat on file-trading at work"
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-993143.html
In a followup story...
"The RIAA's action drew protest from the Information Technology
Association of America, a trade group representing Microsoft Corp.,
IBM Corp., and more than 400 other software and service companies.
"'When corporations are trying to protect themselves from major
hackers and terrorists... trying to do serious damage to their
networks, I don't know that they want to spend their time chasing down
a half-dozen employees who like to trade old Rolling Stones songs,'
said the group's president, Harris Miller. 'It's a matter of
prioritization.'"
http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20950~1253396,00.html
|