|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 239 responses total. |
naftee
|
|
response 153 of 239:
| 
Dec 3 19:03 UTC 2003 |
backtalk should have a way to beat up other users.
|
twenex
|
|
response 154 of 239:
|
Dec 3 21:31 UTC 2003 |
like naftee, dah/polytwerp, and sabre.
|
other
|
|
response 155 of 239:
|
Dec 3 21:38 UTC 2003 |
In your personal settings, there is a twit filter option. Go to
"Entrance" and I think the link is there.
|
gregb
|
|
response 156 of 239:
|
Dec 4 15:11 UTC 2003 |
Thanks.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 157 of 239:
|
Dec 4 18:07 UTC 2003 |
Re 155> Will this skip all items that have the person in my twit
filter as the only new response? Or will it show me these items with
their response hidden?
|
gregb
|
|
response 158 of 239:
|
Dec 4 18:22 UTC 2003 |
I checked the Help pages and there was no mention of a "Twit" filter.
Is this an undocumented option?
Speaking of the Help pages, it would be useful if there examples as to
how these options are employed.
|
keesan
|
|
response 159 of 239:
|
Dec 4 19:03 UTC 2003 |
Re 157 and 158, type ignore for Valerie's program and enter the names of your
twits when prompted. I see all items where the twit was the only one to
respond recently, with a blank line instead of the response. It does not skip
these items, unfortunately.
|
gregb
|
|
response 160 of 239:
|
Dec 4 19:07 UTC 2003 |
This won't work for Backtalk.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 161 of 239:
|
Dec 4 20:36 UTC 2003 |
Re 159> That is unfortunate since it doesn't serve the purpose I'd use
it for :(
|
other
|
|
response 162 of 239:
|
Dec 5 05:34 UTC 2003 |
Unfortunately, filters in Backtalk only hide responses from twits,
not the fact that they responded.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 163 of 239:
|
Dec 5 14:16 UTC 2003 |
Is it feasible to change that? I do understand that staff is pretty
busy though ...
|
aruba
|
|
response 164 of 239:
|
Dec 5 15:18 UTC 2003 |
You should send mail to janc to request any Backtalk changes. But, as you
said, he's pretty busy these days.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 165 of 239:
|
Dec 5 15:22 UTC 2003 |
K, thanks
|
naftee
|
|
response 166 of 239:
|
Dec 5 16:30 UTC 2003 |
janc canht even maintain his test backtalk site.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 167 of 239:
|
Dec 10 17:47 UTC 2003 |
Last night was the second restaurant I noticed seeing U007 on the cash
register display while it was in "idle" mode. Other that saying "You are
James Bond" :-) does anyone know why that particular string shows?
|
albaugh
|
|
response 168 of 239:
|
Dec 10 17:48 UTC 2003 |
Does anyone have an opinion on what it means when your hot water heater has
entered a mode where its pilot light goes out about once a month?
|
glenda
|
|
response 169 of 239:
|
Dec 10 17:54 UTC 2003 |
Time for maintenance call.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 170 of 239:
|
Dec 10 17:55 UTC 2003 |
What would the maintenance accomplish? Cleaning of something to prevent, for
example, unobstructed flow of gas to burner? Or a range of things the "guy"
might check for?
|
glenda
|
|
response 171 of 239:
|
Dec 10 18:22 UTC 2003 |
Best case is the gas nozzle to the pilot is a bit clogged and a simple
cleaning will take care of it. Worse case is the the furnace in on the way
out and needs to be replaced.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 172 of 239:
|
Dec 10 19:07 UTC 2003 |
Both the furnace (not involved) and the hot water heater are ~2 years old.
|
gull
|
|
response 173 of 239:
|
Dec 10 19:09 UTC 2003 |
Could be a bad thermocouple, too, couldn't it? Usually there's one that
connects to the gas valve, to shut off the gas flow if the pilot goes out.
|
tod
|
|
response 174 of 239:
|
Dec 10 19:22 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
goose
|
|
response 175 of 239:
|
Dec 10 20:55 UTC 2003 |
I second that, tod.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 176 of 239:
|
Dec 11 00:54 UTC 2003 |
I third it. Speaking as someone who had a carbon monoxide problem and didn't
know it.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 177 of 239:
|
Dec 11 01:16 UTC 2003 |
The local newspaper here in Ketchikan had a story this week about a
family who died from CO poisoning due to a furnace defect.
|