You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-210 
 
Author Message
25 new of 210 responses total.
krj
response 150 of 210: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 16:11 UTC 2000

Salon today has an overview article of the Internet radio scene, which they 
think is getting ready to explode in popularity:
 
http://salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/06/internet_radio/index.html
 
One little bit from the article: New Orleans jazz station WWOZ says it 
now has 50,000 online listeners to go with its 50,000 over-the-air
listeners, and it is getting 10-15% of its financial contributions from 
outside its broadcast area.
 
jmsaul
response 151 of 210: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 14:54 UTC 2000

There are now some 2500 stations listed on real.com's "Radio Tuner" website,
and quality is very good (for broadcast radio with a reasonable-quality tuner;
it isn't up there with my rooftop antenna and Linn Kudos tuner) most of the
time in experience.  Sometimes "Net Congestion" interferes with a specific
station at a specific time, so I just go to another one.

(I'm using a PowerMac 8600/300 and single-channel ISDN, for comparison
purposes.)

(Should we move the Internet radio part of this discussion to its own item?)
keesan
response 152 of 210: Mark Unseen   Jul 3 14:53 UTC 2000

Sure, start another item if you think there is enough more to say about it.
bmoran
response 153 of 210: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 21:31 UTC 2000

Hey, move it to the 'radio' .cf
bmoran
response 154 of 210: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 21:54 UTC 2000

OOPs, it's already there.
krj
response 155 of 210: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 17:35 UTC 2000

http://www.inside.com today offers a nice story on the two competing 
satellite radio systems, Sirius and XM, which are rapidly moving towards
market.  These will be subscription services for about $10/month,
intended for car drivers.   They plan to distinguish themselves
through the personalities of their DJs.  Sirius plans to recruit
serious and knowledgable people; XM plans to recruit wacky lunatics.
 
XM's plans are driven by Lee Abrams, "a radio legend credited with 
inventing every calcified format in existence -- album and classic
rock, urban contemporary, smooth jazz, Howard Stern."
 
No mention of classical music -- sorry Sindi -- but each service is 
supposed to have 50 channels so maybe a classical service will be 
tossed in.
 
http://www.inside.com/story/Story_Cached/0,2770,7859_9,00.html
keesan
response 156 of 210: Mark Unseen   Aug 10 19:34 UTC 2000

Lynx will not let me view this site.
keesan
response 157 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 21:14 UTC 2000

What is streaming MP3?  Is it the same as RealAudio?  If not, is anyone
broadcasting it and how would one listen to it?  What minimum modem speed
would be needed?  At 33K, it took me a lot longer to download a 1M MP3 file
than to listen to it, but I don't recall the ratio.
other
response 158 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 21:26 UTC 2000

Streaming in general is a technology better served by a connection which 
is fast enough to download data faster than the data can be handled and 
played back to you.  A 33k dial-up connection is not likely to make for a 
worthwhile experience of streaming mp3.
micklpkl
response 159 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 01:04 UTC 2000

Streaming MP3s are, I believe, Shoutcast streams
http://www.shoutcast.com
(although M$ is doing something similiar in another format)
It is different from RealAudio in several ways, from what I understand. I
admit to being self-taught in computer audio. RealAudio is another proprietary
format, and although popular, still requires specialized encoding and server
software. Shoutcast and streaming mp3s are making this quite a bit easier.
I've been listening to several different "homegrown" streams lately. I do this
by pointing WinAMP (not sure about cross-platform availability) to the URL
for the stream. Granted, for full, deep, stereo sound a broadband connection
is a definite must, but, as with mp3s themselves, the encoding parameters of
the music determines the bandwidth required. For example, at work where I am
stuck with a 56K dialup connection, I can listen to my favourite Celtic music
stream, but only because the "D.J." encoded his music at a low bitrate
suitable for dialup streaming. Most decent mp3s are encoded at a bitrate of
128 or 160 Kbps, with theoretically would require at least ISDN for decent
streaming.

I hope that helps. Again, I'm no expert; YMMV
keesan
response 160 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 15:54 UTC 2000

Are any MP3s encoded at 28K? (mono)  Some RealAudio broadcasts are.
keesan
response 161 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 16:02 UTC 2000

Looked at that site.  They offer a choice of players for Windows (Winamp),
Mac, or Linux/X.  Any chance that a DOS MP3 player could be made to work (QV,
DOSAMP)?  I looked up classical broadcasts, of which there are 18 (most are
mixed with jazz or other things), and the bitrates are listed as 128 (very
few), 56, 32, 24, 20 (Moscow) and even 18.  Presumably a 33K modem could
handle up to 32 (with some gaps).  
keesan
response 162 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 16:05 UTC 2000

Winamp requires Win95 or later.  Hopefully Arachne or Newdeal will come up
with some DOS-based way to hear streaming MP3.  Does this sound any better
than RealAudio at the same modem speed?
keesan
response 163 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 16:15 UTC 2000

www.mpeg.org/mpeg/mpeg-audio-player.html  has lots of links to mp3 info,
including one to players for most operating systems - 3 players for DOS, some
for OS/2, BeOS, Solaris, etc.  I might experiment with streaming MP3 and
Win31/Netscape.  Can't be any worse than RealAudio.  Shoutcast seemed to be
implying that only their WinAMP for Win95 would work.
krj
response 164 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 17:49 UTC 2000

My gut feeling is that no streaming system is going to sound particularly
good after it's run through a modem-speed connection, even a 56K one.
keesan
response 165 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 03:04 UTC 2000

How much worse would the best streaming audio sound at 56K than the Toledo
classical station as heard in Ann Arbor, 60 miles away?
krj
response 166 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 18:36 UTC 2000

Yeetch.  Tough call, as the damage being done to the sound is different
in the two transmissions.  Streaming is going to sound tinny, sort of 
like AM radio, with dropouts.  The FM signal from Toledo, particularly
in the daytime, is going to have that nasty hash/static noise.
Name your poison, I guess.
keesan
response 167 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 22:09 UTC 2000

Since Toledo is at many times of the day and week the only classical station
hearable in Ann Arbor, and at some times there are no classical broadcasts
at all (6-6:30 pm) even a tinny internet broadcast would be welcome.  Toledo
is not as bad in mono - I almost never try to listen to classical music on
the radio in stereo as we have no classical stations close enough.  
gelinas
response 168 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 03:16 UTC 2000

WKAR is often classical, and usually hearable.  The only place I regular
lose it is on Packard at State.
scott
response 169 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 13:39 UTC 2000

WKAR is mostly talk these days.  They do pipe in classical at night, I think
around 8pm is when they change from talk to music.
rcurl
response 170 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:23 UTC 2000

It is? I get mostly classical during the day (though I listen infrequently
- only when driving).
gelinas
response 171 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:42 UTC 2000

WUOM *used* to be classical and is *now* mostly talk.  WKAR is still classical
when I switch to it, which is less often.  I usually listen to WEMU, but
lately I've been tuning W4 Country whenever WEMU is not broadcasting news.
WKAR is the fall back when I can't stand any more jazz or twang.
scott
response 172 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:47 UTC 2000

Oops, right.  I confused WKAR and WUOM.
krj
response 173 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:47 UTC 2000

Scott's resp:169 sounds like a description of WUOM, not WKAR, before 
WUOM dumped its remaining classical music to run BBC news overnight.
 
WKAR-FM's web schedule says they run classical music from 8am - 4pm,
with hourly news breaks, 7pm-11pm (except for the Friday jazz show),
and then midnight through 5 am.  That's Monday through Friday, the 
weekend schedule packs in all sorts of non-classical stuff like 
"Prairie Home Companion" and the Sunday night folk music shows.
krj
response 174 of 210: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:48 UTC 2000

(several responses slipped in.  The price of research.  :) )
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-210 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss