You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-291        
 
Author Message
25 new of 291 responses total.
tpryan
response 150 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 18:21 UTC 2003

        Why would modem replacement take more than taking the
two disconnected and replaceing the first two in the trunk hunt?
THEN IF problem persists.  Swap those two for the last two.  Is 
that more than a 22 minute visit at the pumpkin?
keesan
response 151 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 18:34 UTC 2003

There has already been lots of modem swapping and half of the time it just
makes things worse.  These modems are not reliable.
gelinas
response 152 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 19:27 UTC 2003

So far as I know, there has been no swapping of modems in recent memory.

The next time I'm out, I'll swap in a couple of the recently retired modems.
keesan
response 153 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 20:36 UTC 2003

Scott swapped modems not too long ago and what he put in was worse, I don't
recall exactly how.
tsty
response 154 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 07:00 UTC 2003

nto a happy sight ...
 
 df
Filesystem            kbytes    used   avail capacity  Mounted on
/dev/sd0a             109823   76941   21900    78%    /
/dev/sd0d             156783  137446    3659    97%    /usr
/dev/sd6h            1971009 1804600       0   102%    /usr/local
/dev/sd0e             706783  354791  281314    56%    /bbs
/dev/sd0f             471183  450069       0   106%    /x
/dev/sd6g            1969885 1219140  553757    69%    /var
/dev/sd3h            1944365 1222411  527518    70%    /var/spool/mail
/dev/sd2a              31023   17781   10140    64%    /rootbak
/dev/sd2d              31023   16038   11883    57%    /suidbin
/dev/sd2f              62863   11755   44822    21%    /tmp
/dev/sd2h             842574  686687   71630    91%    /s
/dev/sd4a            1944365 1577694  172235    90%    /c
/dev/sd1c            1944365 1059672  690257    61%    /a
/dev/sd7g            1971009 1766520    7389   100%    /d
/dev/sd2e             699223  455142  174159    72%    /oldvar
/dev/sd0h             284215  252695    3099    99%    /oldbbs
  
bhoward
response 155 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 07:36 UTC 2003

That's the second time recently that /d filled, isn't it?
twenex
response 156 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 10:18 UTC 2003

argh. I'd be more concerned about /usr/local "running at" 102%. Filesystems
aren't Hollywood nuclear submarine or starship  warp engines, and don't run
well over capacity...

(Not to mention /x at 106%...
gelinas
response 157 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 12:15 UTC 2003

It's more than the second time, I think.

Yes, filesystesm can run at more than 100%; the OS keeps a cushion available.
davel
response 158 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 13:19 UTC 2003

(Only root can allocate disk blocks once 100% is exceeded.  So no, things
mostly don't run well at over 100%, but /x & most likely /usr/local may not
notice the problem until they actually run out.)
russ
response 159 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 14:01 UTC 2003

As the last of four dial-in users this morning, I got a decently
fast connection.  This might be helpful to whoever is doing the
debugging.
twenex
response 160 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 14:27 UTC 2003

Ah. After gelinas 2cents I suspected that "100%" actually meant "100% of the
space not reserved to root." QED.
gull
response 161 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 14:47 UTC 2003

It's tricky because it's OS-dependent.  Most Linux distributions report
percentages of the total disk space.  BSD and SunOS report percentages
of the disk space available to users.  So it's possible to fill a BSD
file system over 100% but not a Linux one.
twenex
response 162 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 14:49 UTC 2003

Hmm. Does POSIX have anything to say on this?
jhudson
response 163 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 15:43 UTC 2003

I've gotten two different takes on full filesystems under Linux.
It seems to matter which df I use (I have three of them: one from
my distribution, one from busybox, and one from asmutils).
twenex
response 164 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 15:57 UTC 2003

Hmm. What's the behaviour from your distro's version? I'd consider that
standard (for Linux).
gull
response 165 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 18:49 UTC 2003

In at least one version of df it's a compile-time flag, so you can have
it either way.
krj
response 166 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 20:57 UTC 2003

www.cyberspace.org is not loading for me or for two other party
users in widely separated locations.  
gull
response 167 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 21:25 UTC 2003

It times out for me, too.
gelinas
response 168 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 23:23 UTC 2003

I swapped out the first two modems (3000 and 5041) for two recently removed
from service.  I also updated the phones script.

It looks like whatever was bothering httpd has now been fixed.
other
response 169 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 03:00 UTC 2003

/x is not a user partition at all, so its being over 100% is of no 
consequence.
russ
response 170 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 19 23:40 UTC 2003

Speed on the modems is vastly improved.  Thanks to gelinas.
gelinas
response 171 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 05:03 UTC 2003

Glad it helped.  Wish I knew which of the two removed from service was bad.
rcurl
response 172 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 20 16:38 UTC 2003

I have been a supporter of Grex in the past by having several small
 non-profit organizations with which I have been associated join Grex and
 use it at least as their website and board mail reflector. The latter,
 however, has become untenable because of spam. There is nearly ten times
 more spam being distributed to the boards than board correspondence. Is
 there any hope of soon having access to a filter here for spam? I will
 probably move an organization off Grex (and thereby cancel membership)
 unless there is some recourse against this avalanche of junk e-mail.
gelinas
response 173 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 17:51 UTC 2003

} #233 of 233: by Rane Curl (rcurl) on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 (11:18):
}  Could Grex use the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) to block spam? See
}  http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/howtouse.html
rcurl
response 174 of 291: Mark Unseen   Nov 21 18:06 UTC 2003

(Gag...I did it again - entered that item in oldagora. I always scan
oldagora before agora, and have been forgetting where I am.... thanks
Joe, for bringing it over.)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-291        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss