You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175   
 
Author Message
25 new of 175 responses total.
fuz
response 150 of 175: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 22:43 UTC 1995

 NO! ill be out of a job
wavestar
response 151 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 18:10 UTC 1995

true... you are his most unclear highness, aren't you?
fuz
response 152 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 01:45 UTC 1995

 most.
wavestar
response 153 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 18:38 UTC 1995

oh goody.
fuz
response 154 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 01:55 UTC 1995

 <smile>
 we nee dlonger answers here, doncha think?
starwolf
response 155 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 15:30 UTC 1995

My lord, wherefore thinkest thou that our responses here lack wordiness?
'tis Against my nature to say that which need not be said, and it doth cut
me to the quick to see that e'en that is not enough! I war only trying to
conserve Grex's precious Hard-drive space, and now thou dost throw that
attempt at a good deed in my face.  Methinks that we need to check our
priorities...  
fuz
response 156 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 02:23 UTC 1995

 length oughta beget meaning, woof.. ;)
starwolf
response 157 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 17:47 UTC 1995

My point exactly.  (I think)
fuz
response 158 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 19:32 UTC 1995

 ahh.. i see..
wavestar
response 159 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 01:29 UTC 1995

Whatever it is that you say...
selena
response 160 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 04:04 UTC 1995

<Selena doesn't believe in saying anything unimportant>
wavestar
response 161 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 20:25 UTC 1995

right.
starwolf
response 162 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 16:37 UTC 1995

What was the subject again?
selena
response 163 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 04:38 UTC 1995

        Depends.. what are we subject to?
mooncat
response 164 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 13:04 UTC 1995

Welllllll..... we are all subjects to the King....

selena
response 165 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 15:08 UTC 1995

        Is the King an affliction that we are subject to? I don't get i..
OH! Ahem! Well, yes..
mooncat
response 166 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 22:52 UTC 1995

hee hee

selena
response 167 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 09:38 UTC 1995

        Oh, hush. I had a fuz moment.
cyberpnk
response 168 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 23:34 UTC 1995

Is that anything like a Kodak moment? =:[
selena
response 169 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 05:14 UTC 1995

        Well, no, you usually don't want to be photographed in a Fuz moment..
fuz
response 170 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 22:22 UTC 1995

some people like thast sort of thing.

 oops, was that out loud.. sorry.
starwolf
response 171 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 26 18:20 UTC 1995

To each its own...
wavestar
response 172 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 27 22:06 UTC 1995

Watching fuzzy... he has his moments...
fuz
response 173 of 175: Mark Unseen   Oct 29 17:28 UTC 1995

 yup.
wavestar
response 174 of 175: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 21:28 UTC 1995

<hugs fuzzy>
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss