|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 320 responses total. |
fuz
|
|
response 150 of 320:
| 
Sep 1 20:24 UTC 1995 |
not i. rare, pleez.
|
starwolf
|
|
response 151 of 320:
|
Sep 9 15:35 UTC 1995 |
<Starwolf looks at the steaks and wonders what about the megaton yeild of the
cooking device>
|
selena
|
|
response 152 of 320:
|
Sep 11 14:56 UTC 1995 |
<Selena conjurs a geiger counter>
Hmm..
|
fuz
|
|
response 153 of 320:
|
Sep 12 19:55 UTC 1995 |
ohboy.
|
starwolf
|
|
response 154 of 320:
|
Sep 13 15:04 UTC 1995 |
Nicely put, sire. ;)
|
fuz
|
|
response 155 of 320:
|
Sep 13 18:28 UTC 1995 |
took me hours and hours to say it so succinctly..
word choice is everything.
|
selena
|
|
response 156 of 320:
|
Sep 15 16:23 UTC 1995 |
Hmmm.. it's definetly active <clickkkackkkackkkaccckk..>
|
fuz
|
|
response 157 of 320:
|
Sep 18 20:14 UTC 1995 |
er?
|
wavestar
|
|
response 158 of 320:
|
Sep 22 22:21 UTC 1995 |
uhoh...
|
selena
|
|
response 159 of 320:
|
Sep 23 00:44 UTC 1995 |
Umm.. what's the Court's policy re: nuclear hazards?
|
fuz
|
|
response 160 of 320:
|
Sep 25 21:19 UTC 1995 |
definitely bad.
|
starwolf
|
|
response 161 of 320:
|
Sep 26 15:19 UTC 1995 |
Eyeww... <Starwolf begins a cleansing ritual that *should* get rid of the
radiation...>
|
selena
|
|
response 162 of 320:
|
Sep 29 02:20 UTC 1995 |
<Selena joins in>
|
fuz
|
|
response 163 of 320:
|
Sep 29 22:26 UTC 1995 |
ohboy.
|
wavestar
|
|
response 164 of 320:
|
Oct 1 18:04 UTC 1995 |
help?
|
selena
|
|
response 165 of 320:
|
Oct 2 16:51 UTC 1995 |
Ummm.. I need some lead shielding as.. a component! Yes, that's
it!
|
fuz
|
|
response 166 of 320:
|
Oct 4 01:43 UTC 1995 |
165?? wow, i wonder how to make the numbers palatable without
pissing yall off like i did last time..
|
selena
|
|
response 167 of 320:
|
Oct 4 05:14 UTC 1995 |
Fuz- in synthesis, the welcome item was at response #777 last time I
looked.
|
wavestar
|
|
response 168 of 320:
|
Oct 4 18:35 UTC 1995 |
Yeah, but I know that if I want to read an item, I don't want to have to read
165 responses...
|
fuz
|
|
response 169 of 320:
|
Oct 5 01:52 UTC 1995 |
what should i do? mopre new iems? let the old ones run their course
before killing them, but make a new "TITLE" item, etc?
|
fuz
|
|
response 170 of 320:
|
Oct 6 02:20 UTC 1995 |
input? ;)
|
wavestar
|
|
response 171 of 320:
|
Oct 7 01:25 UTC 1995 |
As your High Councilor, I must advise that I don't know! I would start new
ones, but warn people before hand...
|
selena
|
|
response 172 of 320:
|
Oct 7 04:00 UTC 1995 |
You're fine as is
|
fuz
|
|
response 173 of 320:
|
Oct 8 01:42 UTC 1995 |
for you, m'lady.. not for new members who have to read
.. 172 responses, here, f'instance.
|
selena
|
|
response 174 of 320:
|
Oct 10 17:31 UTC 1995 |
look, afterdark, which started in JUne has an opening item
with over 500 responses, and it's doing fine,
and not losing any new people!
|
