You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   120-144   145-169   170-194   195-219 
 220-244   245-269   270-294   295-319   320-344   345-357     
 
Author Message
25 new of 357 responses total.
lar
response 145 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 146 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 147 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 148 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 149 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 150 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 151 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 152 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 153 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 154 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 155 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 156 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 157 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 158 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 159 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 160 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 161 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 162 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 163 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

tod
response 164 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:51 UTC 2010

<gets indignant>
*tut tut*
kentn
response 165 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 17:21 UTC 2010

You'll only be able to edit one response at a time via the usual
interface.  So each of those responses can be denied or approved based
on their date/time stamps if we were able to implement that feature.

While it is true that discussions here quite often generate more heat
than light, at least we are trying to understand and trying determine
how best to do things.  A lack of good information quite often leads
to misunderstandings, too.  So it's fine if someone corrects such a
misunderstanding or asks for more information.  We can move forward from
that point.
richard
response 166 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 17:52 UTC 2010

the time limit is important because it would prevent circumstances like 
when valerie mates decided to leave grex and decided to delete all of 
his past posts she ever made here going back years.
kentn
response 167 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 17:56 UTC 2010

But we're talking about time limits for editing, not deleting.  Are we
proposing a time limit for deleting?
richard
response 168 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 18:01 UTC 2010

I think both are advisable.
kentn
response 169 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 18:03 UTC 2010

That runs counter to the "you own your own responses" rule. 
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   120-144   145-169   170-194   195-219 
 220-244   245-269   270-294   295-319   320-344   345-357     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss