| You are not logged in. Login Now | register | search | |||||||||
|
| |||
| Author | Message | ||
| 6 new of 150 responses total. | |||
|
gull |
That's kind of the point. | ||
|
bru |
thtas what I mean. i could sit here and say married people have to have sex withone foot on the floor for it to be a leagal weddig. That wouldn't make it so. | ||
|
tod |
This response has been erased.
| ||
|
gull |
The point, to spell it out for you, is that calls to remain true to the "Biblical definition of marriage" are irrelevent; we've already gotten away from that long, long ago. What people currently think of as the "Biblical definition of marriage" is really just tradition, and relatively recent tradition at that. | ||
|
rcurl |
Of course, the point is, it is *some peoples'* tradition. That's fine. But it is not *all peoples'* tradition - nor is it immutable. | ||
|
lynne |
re 148: Hallelujah. I wasn't looking forward to being executed. although watching people have to pay one shoe for not marrying their brothers' widows sounds pretty funny. if anyone needs to do that, I have a bunch of shoes I'd be happy to donate. | ||
|
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In |
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss