You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   120-144   145-150    
 
Author Message
6 new of 150 responses total.
gull
response 145 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 12:34 UTC 2003

That's kind of the point.
bru
response 146 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 21:51 UTC 2003

thtas what I mean.  i could sit here and say married people have to have sex
withone foot on the floor for it to be a leagal weddig.  That wouldn't make
it so.
tod
response 147 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 22:07 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 148 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 02:53 UTC 2003

The point, to spell it out for you, is that calls to remain true to the
"Biblical definition of marriage" are irrelevent; we've already gotten
away from that long, long ago.  What people currently think of as the
"Biblical definition of marriage" is really just tradition, and
relatively recent tradition at that.
rcurl
response 149 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 05:25 UTC 2003

Of course, the point is, it is *some peoples'* tradition. That's fine.
But it is not *all peoples'* tradition - nor is it immutable.
lynne
response 150 of 150: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 17:47 UTC 2003

re 148:  Hallelujah.  I wasn't looking forward to being executed.  although
watching people have to pay one shoe for not marrying their brothers' widows
sounds pretty funny.  if anyone needs to do that, I have a bunch of shoes
I'd be happy to donate.  
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   120-144   145-150    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss