| Grex > Coop > #278: Grex Town Hall -- How do we move forward? |  |
| response 143 of 357: | 
Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010 |
Why? Here's why
| response 144 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 145 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 146 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 147 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 148 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 149 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 150 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 151 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 152 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 153 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 154 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 155 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 156 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 157 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 158 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 159 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 160 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 161 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 162 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 163 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
| response 164 of 357: |
Jun 24 16:51 UTC 2010 |
<gets indignant> *tut tut*
| response 165 of 357: |
Jun 24 17:21 UTC 2010 |
You'll only be able to edit one response at a time via the usual interface. So each of those responses can be denied or approved based on their date/time stamps if we were able to implement that feature. While it is true that discussions here quite often generate more heat than light, at least we are trying to understand and trying determine how best to do things. A lack of good information quite often leads to misunderstandings, too. So it's fine if someone corrects such a misunderstanding or asks for more information. We can move forward from that point.
| response 166 of 357: |
Jun 24 17:52 UTC 2010 |
the time limit is important because it would prevent circumstances like when valerie mates decided to leave grex and decided to delete all of his past posts she ever made here going back years.
| response 167 of 357: |
Jun 24 17:56 UTC 2010 |
But we're talking about time limits for editing, not deleting. Are we proposing a time limit for deleting?