You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   115-139   140-164   165-189   190-214 
 215-239   240-264   265-278        
 
Author Message
25 new of 278 responses total.
twenex
response 140 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 22 15:56 UTC 2004

Troy: Excellent.

Saddle my horse, the epic is back!
md
response 141 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 14:47 UTC 2004

Two recent rentals we missed in the theaters:

RUSSIAN ARK (A) - A Russian director's loving homage to Russian culture 
and The Hermitage, the big museum in Leningrad (St. Petersburg to you 
capitalist pigs).  The camera travels from room to room -- 37 of them 
in all -- following a European snob (Russian actor doing what I suppose 
sounds to Russian ears like a French accent) and his invisible Russian 
companion (the voice of the director, from whose POV the movie is 
seen).  There we see personages and incidents from 300 years of Russian 
history.  The movie is 90 minutes long, and although it took four years 
to prepare, the actual shooting was done in one single 90-minute-long 
take.  I knew beforehand that that's how the movie had been shot, but I 
didn't beieve it until I actually saw it.  The final 15 minutes, in 
which about a thousand actors dressed in period costumes dance the last 
dance at a grand ball then make their way down the huge double-
staircase and off the stage of history forever, is one of the most 
beautiful things I've ever seen in a movie.  (This is one movie where 
the interviews and "making of" documentary in the Special Features are 
just as interestng as the movie itself.)

CALENDAR GIRLS (B) - A trying-not-to-look-exploitive movie about the 
middle-aged English garden club ladies who made a nude calendar of 
themselves to raise money for a good cause.  Helen Mirren is excellent 
as the ageing egotistical wild child whose idea the whole thing is.  
Lots of false sentimentality and other commercial phoniness, but really 
no worse than most other movies.  Plus, the Brit's eye view of American 
glitz is priceless.
rcurl
response 142 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 15:24 UTC 2004

Troy was pretty well done, especially if you like mass (and individual) 
slauterings. Also, the book was better (having survived for a couple of
millenia-plus, which I doubt the movie will). But it was moderately
faithful to the book(s) - except for omitting Cassandra, who killed
Agamemnon *after* he took her back to Greece. 

twenex
response 143 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 16:45 UTC 2004

In Troy's defence, the director does include the caveat at the beginnign of
the end (credits) that the story was *inspired* by The Iliad, a level of
honesty you don't find in 3rd-rate Tolkien-inspired fantasy.
realugly
response 144 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 17:02 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

remmers
response 145 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 17:26 UTC 2004

Haven't seen "Troy", but as I understand it the movie has no supernatural
beings (a.k.a. gods).  They were pretty important characters in The Iliad.
twenex
response 146 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 17:27 UTC 2004

There aren't any people in the film playing Gods, but it's hardly a secular
travesty of the book; several are mentioned quite often.
realugly
response 147 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 17:34 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

mcnally
response 148 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 17:47 UTC 2004

  re #142:  Agamemnon was killed by Clytemnestra, with the help of her
            lover Aegisthus.

            Cassandra was pretty much a one-device character, though
            it's a great device: always (accurately) foretelling
            misfortune and never being believed..
rcurl
response 149 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 19:08 UTC 2004

The characters are doing all sorts of things because of and on behalf of
their gods, and statues of them abound. One would interpret from the movie
that much in their society was heavily influenced by their beliefs in gods.

Aha! I will speak to my resident expert on Greek myths, who told me
Cassandra slew Agememnon. However, she was close: Clymtemnestra slew
both Agemenon and Cassandra. 

At least it was faithful to Achilles' heel, which everyone knows about
and therefore had to be kept (at least, everyone knows Achilles had a
heel....).
twenex
response 150 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 19:09 UTC 2004

Heh. One review my Dad read said they made no mention of the heel. D'Oh!
realugly
response 151 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 19:22 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 152 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 20:01 UTC 2004

They didn't *mention* the heel, but it was shown clearly that an arrow
shot by Paris penetrated Achilles' heel. 

Did the actor portraying Achilles perform all those calesthetics in
battle, or were some done by stuntmen - or even computer generated?
twenex
response 153 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 20:02 UTC 2004

"The actor portraying Achilles"?! Are you telling us you never heard of Brad
Pitt?!
realugly
response 154 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 23 20:05 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 155 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 24 05:45 UTC 2004

Wasn't Pitt the actor portraying Achilles?
twenex
response 156 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 24 05:50 UTC 2004

I believe I just said that...
realugly
response 157 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 24 06:15 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

edina
response 158 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 24 18:51 UTC 2004

Brad Pitt worked out to get in shape to play Achilles for a year previous to
filming.
tod
response 159 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 24 19:04 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

katie
response 160 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 25 20:33 UTC 2004

Shrek 2 is wonderful. I'll have to see it a few times to catch all the
stuff.
gull
response 161 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 26 13:54 UTC 2004

Supersize Me - In case you aren't familiar with the premise of the
movie, here's how it works:  A guy decides to eat nothing but McDonalds
food for a month.  The rules are he can only eat things that are sold at
McDonalds, he has to eat three meals a day, he has to try everything on
the menu at least once, and if they ask him if he wants to supersize it,
he has to say yes.  The effects on his health are dramatic -- he gains
about 20 pounds, much of it in the first two weeks; his cholesterol
skyrockets; his liver starts to shut down; he suffers mood swings and
depression that are only relieved by eating more food.

Now, to get the main criticism of the movie out of the way, no, there's
nothing particularly unique about McDonalds food.  If he'd eaten 5,000
calories a day somewhere else, he probably would have gotten pretty much
the same results.  But there's more to the movie than that -- he talks
about how fast-food advertising is targeted at children, how the
advertising we see favors unhealthy foods over healthy ones, how portion
sizes have expanded over the years, and how school hot lunches are now
mostly reheated convenience foods instead of healthier food cooked at
the school.

It's a funny and thought-provoking movie, and it'll make you wonder
about your own diet.  Even the doctors he consults with are astounded at
how dramatic the effects on his body are in just 30 days.
tod
response 162 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 26 17:55 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

richard
response 163 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 27 03:33 UTC 2004

At the screening of "Supersize Me" that I saw here in nyc, the director
spoke afterwards.  He made it clear that one reason the effects of all
that eating McD's were so dramatic in his case, is that he did not and
does not regularly eat junk or high fat foods.  His girlfriend is a vegan
chef.  So his body was not in any way conditioned to that kind of diet.
It is like if you have two guys who decide to go on a booze binge, and one
of the guys is a habitual regular drinker and the other guy is normally a
teetotaler.  Who is the binge drinking going to affect more?  Answer-- the
guy who doesn't drink normally because his body isn't used to it.  So
naturally, a guy who is mostly a vegetarian and never eats fried food, to
all of a sudden eat nothing but fried food for a solid month, is going to
have tolerance issues.  As he said, once his body adapted to the high fat
fried food diet, the physical problems would be reduced.  He was less sick
at the end of the month than he was seventeen days in.  His body was
adapting.
tod
response 164 of 278: Mark Unseen   May 27 16:52 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   115-139   140-164   165-189   190-214 
 215-239   240-264   265-278        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss