You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   111-135   136-160   161-185   186-210 
 211-235   236-260   261-285   286-310   311-335   336-357     
 
Author Message
25 new of 357 responses total.
kentn
response 136 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 14:12 UTC 2010

Even in Confer days some people quoted entire items to keep them from
being deleted by their owners.  So this is quite an old issue.

Although this seems like an interesting twist, it doesn't affect the
editing discussion because this issue of quoted text could occur (and
has) even without editing.  This is getting into "business policy"
territory rather than technical (although the BP might be implemented as
a technical solution).  One solution is to allow moderation due to the
number of people and competing interests that might be involved.  And of
course, we don't like *COUGH* moderation.
mary
response 137 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 14:58 UTC 2010

Yep, making it clear that your ability to edit your words only extends to 
responses you have entered sounds like a good policy.  I'd support giving 
users the ability to edit their responses in that case.
slynne
response 138 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 15:05 UTC 2010

One thing to consider would be a time limit. One site I frequent allows
editing but only for 90 minutes after the response is entered. 
lar
response 139 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 15:35 UTC 2010

you lamers are so clusterfucked it's amusing
tonster
response 140 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 15:44 UTC 2010

a time limit isn't possible with backtalk, so unless we switch
conferencing systems that's off the table.  I absolutely support editing
of responses, as I've stated previously.
kentn
response 141 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 15:56 UTC 2010

Why isn't it possible, Tony?  We know the time the response was entered
since that appears in the item response.  Apparently if we turn on
editing, we know the modification time (since it would go into a note
added to the response). Can't those two times be compared and editing
disallowed if the difference is more than some limit?
lar
response 142 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:23 UTC 2010

DAMN...what clusterfucks..just allow editing of posts and be done with 
it you petty motherfuckers
lar
response 143 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010

Why?

Here's why
lar
response 144 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 145 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 146 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:24 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 147 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 148 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 149 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 150 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 151 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 152 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 153 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:25 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 154 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 155 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 156 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 157 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 158 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 159 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

lar
response 160 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jun 24 16:27 UTC 2010

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   111-135   136-160   161-185   186-210 
 211-235   236-260   261-285   286-310   311-335   336-357     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss