You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   107-131   132-156   157-181   182-187 
 
Author Message
25 new of 187 responses total.
scott
response 132 of 187: Mark Unseen   May 30 23:26 UTC 1997

I think the new modems are not quite happy yet.  My suspicion is that the Grex
port speed keeps defaulting to less than 2400 baud, so I'm thinking about
setting those ports for 2400 baud only, and trusting the modem to deal with
it if somebody connects at 1200.
mdw
response 133 of 187: Mark Unseen   May 31 03:16 UTC 1997

That's guaranteed to cause lost output.  Only the 1st 4 ports have
rts/cts logic.  The other ports do not have handshaking.  If the modem
can't keep up with grex, output is lost.  There is no way around this.
Since flow control is essential with error correction or for baud-rate
mismatching, that imples all the ports except for the first 4 should
have error correction disabled, and the modem speed should be the same
as grex's speed.
valerie
response 134 of 187: Mark Unseen   May 31 05:00 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

davel
response 135 of 187: Mark Unseen   May 31 11:23 UTC 1997

Marcus, thanks for the quick work on ftpd.
rcurl
response 136 of 187: Mark Unseen   May 31 16:25 UTC 1997

Yes - ftp dir works fine now. Nice to be able to see what one is doing....
mcnally
response 137 of 187: Mark Unseen   May 31 17:04 UTC 1997

 *are* there any people left with sub-2400bps modems anymore?
 since 2400bps modems can be had at swap meets for pennies at
 some point it becomes cheaper/easier to stockpile a stack of
 them and *give* them away to the 1200bps users and not inconvenience
 everyone else using faster modems and waste staff time supporting
 the technology..
bjorn
response 138 of 187: Mark Unseen   May 31 18:35 UTC 1997

lately I've been getting a failed security checkpoint message when I leave
the first conference of my .cflist (or whichever file it is that orders my
conference membership).
omni
response 139 of 187: Mark Unseen   May 31 20:56 UTC 1997

  I have a 300bps that is my backup to my backup emergency modem.

 However, my Porsche is doing fine, and is showing no signs of failing.
(hayes 14400)
valerie
response 140 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 04:49 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

senna
response 141 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 17:17 UTC 1997

sounds more like a '94 escort at the moment, omni.  My '96 28800 has yet to
fail, but we have two backup modems just in case.
drew
response 142 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 17:51 UTC 1997

I have a 300 baud TRASH-80 modem in the basement, which I haven't used since
'89. Probably works. 2400s are more common here though; and I use a NewComn
33.6K on the main brain, and have a 14.4K ZOOM out on loan to someone who is
trying to use it to play MOO 2 multi-player.
srw
response 143 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 18:36 UTC 1997

In answer to resp:131. I switched from MSIE to Netscape. It's much 
better, doesn't have as many security problems, and wraps the text like 
Backtalk expects it to. 
tsty
response 144 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 06:34 UTC 1997

plus, microsoft maybe getting out of the internet service provider
business....
senna
response 145 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 05:04 UTC 1997

For reasons I cannot fathom, I am unable to properly dialin to grex.  Dialing
both -5041 and -3000, I get garbled messages... I can tell what grex is
supposed to say, but for whatever reason the characters are changed to
gibberish.  
jared
response 146 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 07:19 UTC 1997

Are you dialing at 81N or 71E?
valerie
response 147 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 13:24 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

triveni
response 148 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 19:55 UTC 1997

hi !! agni , sorry but can you tell me how do we come out of the picospan as
i logged in first time yesterday and happen to chose this . i wanted to chose
the menu type !! 
win95
response 149 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 20:48 UTC 1997

I think triveni is confused in bbs :) type unix then it will get you $ prompt
senna
response 150 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 22:16 UTC 1997

Microsoft Internet explorer, since it seems to be the stable browser at the
moment.  I was worried about my word wrap.
remmers
response 151 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 22:43 UTC 1997

My experience using MSIE with Backtalk was that it tended to mess
up word wrap. Netscape, on the other hand, does not. So I've
switched to Netscape.

(The "stability" of MSIE is debatable, but that's material for 
another item.)
senna
response 152 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 05:10 UTC 1997

Wow, the word wrap *is* hideous.  My dialin program was indeed set wrong,
thanks for the advice.  

MSIE is stable on my computer, that's all that counts.
scg
response 153 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 06:12 UTC 1997

Would it be possible to make backtalk do the wordwrap itself, if the browser
won't do it.  I know the browser should do it, but MSIE is really too popular
a browser to just ignore, no matter how bad a browser it may be.
mcnally
response 154 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 06:20 UTC 1997

  The only way I know of to enforce word-wrap from backtalk would be to
  have it surround everything with the pre tag, which would be fairly
  unattractive unless you're a big fan of the Courier font..  basically
  you'd be making it moderately ugly for everyone to avoid making it
  *really* ugly for those users whose broken software is the culprit.
danr
response 155 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 11:25 UTC 1997

Backtalk already surrounds responses with the <pre> tag. (I just 
looked at the html source.)
remmers
response 156 of 187: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 13:21 UTC 1997

Right. I think the MSIE/Backtalk word wrap problem is that when
you type text into the form entry box and let MSIE do the word
wrap for you, MSIE isn't passing the line breaks over to
Backtalk when the form is submitted. Netscape, on the other
hand, does it right.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   107-131   132-156   157-181   182-187 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss