You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   106-130   131-155   156-180   181-205 
 206-230   231-255   256-280   281-290       
 
Author Message
25 new of 290 responses total.
aaron
response 131 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 25 22:29 UTC 1998

Christopher Potter's biggest flaw is that he confuses summarizing a movie
with "reviewing" a movie. His second biggest flaw is that he generally has
bad taste.

i
response 132 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 03:05 UTC 1998

Re: #129
You've very little knowledge of how Overlord played out if you think that 
nothing went wrong.  Hitler didn't need more time to sent troops to
Normandy (he'd done that in May '44, moving the 21st Panzer division, 91st
Infantry, and loads of smaller units into near-perfect positions to 
oppose the invasion), he needed a transportation network that the Allied 
air forces weren't bombing into rubble.  And what he could have diverted 
of the 59 divisions in the West on 6/4/44 after a victory in Normandy would 
not have changed the 163 divisions being vanquished in Italy and the East
into winners. 

The horrible carnage of D-Day (on the Allied side) was mostly due to
General Omar Bradley & Co.'s refusal to learn from the horrible carnage 
of the Dieppe raid.  The British weren't that stupid (well, it was *their*
guys who got butchered at Dieppe), and went ashore prepared in Normandy -
enjoying an easy victory and minimal losses as a result. 
kittie
response 133 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 03:56 UTC 1998

For anyone who likes comedies will absolutely LOVE the movie "Mafia"
It was *very* funny
omni
response 134 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 04:30 UTC 1998

  Scorsese will always be my favorite, that is, next to my all time favorite,
Barry Levinson.
 
  Spielberg did a great job on Always.
senna
response 135 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 26 07:06 UTC 1998

I'd disagree with some of the interpretations richard took out of Private
Ryan, but that's a personal issue anyway.  The ending review was on target.
carolyn
response 136 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 27 03:13 UTC 1998

Mr Potter seems to think that every movie has to be socially redeeming.
I usually disagree with him and have met very few people who agree with his
point of view on any film.  How does that guy keep his job?
fyber219
response 137 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 27 05:26 UTC 1998

Hi everyone........  I'm new to this conf.   I work at a local movie theatre,
doing pretty much everything.   So if anyone has any questions about how
things work "behind the scenes" or maybe if a movie that is coming out is
anygood (I usually watch the new releases in special screenings for employee's
days before it comes out)   leave a message for me here or e-mail me at 
movieguy@fyber.fsn.net
-Neil  aka. Fyber219 aka. movieguy
kittie
response 138 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 27 09:24 UTC 1998

Welcome, fyber219
eieio
response 139 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 27 13:55 UTC 1998

I thought that Potter wasn't that far off the mark in his review of
"Ponette". He's given me a couple of decent reviews, so I'm afraid I 
qualify, at best, as a part-time Potter-basher. 
 
But it's not for nothing that his annual awards are referred to as
"The Potties".
remmers
response 140 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 28 13:09 UTC 1998

"Henry Fool"  A+

To hell with what some of the critics say. This is a wonderful
film. Funny, moving, satirical, complex, risk-taking, thought-
provoking epic about friendship, influence, responsibility, and
several other things. Brilliantly written, photographed, and
acted. I loved almost every minute of it, including a few distinctly
uncomfortable ones. It firmly establishes Hal Hartley as one of
today's great filmmakers.

The blurb in the Michigan Theater schedule asserts that the film
was inspired by Harold Bloom's _The Anxiety of Influence_. I shall
have to have a look at that book.

"Henry Fool" still has a couple more showings at the Michigan
Theater - Tuesday July 28 at 7:00 and Thursday July 30 at 9:00.
toking
response 141 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 28 13:58 UTC 1998

"Disturbing Behavior" has to be one of the worst movies I"ve seen in a
long time. The idea was kinda cool, but something went drastically wrong
when they tried to do something with it.

first half hour: too slow, too stupid
next 15 minutes: kinda cool
rest: too fast, too little
eieio
response 142 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 28 14:56 UTC 1998

The idea was kind of cool... when it was still called "The Stepford Wives".
nsiddall
response 143 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 28 15:12 UTC 1998

Quick question:  What is the film that Jim Jarmusch made with soundtrack
based on Screaming Jay Hawkins "I Put a Spell on You"?

(I just watched "Down by Law" again; watched the mesmerizing intro over
and over, set to a perfect Tom Waits song...and now I want to see that
earlier film, but I forget the name of it.)

("Mystery Train" is very good, too.)

remmers
response 144 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 28 16:53 UTC 1998

If it's earlier than "Down by Law", which was Jarmusch's second
feature, then it must be "Stranger than Paradise", his first.
maeve
response 145 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 28 19:15 UTC 1998

ugh, I hated Henry Fool..granted it was well-made, but it was a well-made
bad-movie
remmers
response 146 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 29 01:49 UTC 1998

Well, as was said more than once in the movie itself, "You can't
argue about taste."
maeve
response 147 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 29 06:09 UTC 1998

oh..and why did all teh clothes, hairstyles etc stay exactly the same 10 or
so years later in the 'end' of teh film? that bothered me..
remmers
response 148 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 29 11:50 UTC 1998

I don't think Hartley was after naturalistic realism. If that
bothered you, how about this: Did you notice all the beer in the
film? People drinking from cans and carrying around six-packs.
Did you notice that it was always exactly the same brand?
maeve
response 149 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 29 15:30 UTC 1998

did you notice no one ever ate anythign except beer, the one bite of lasagna,
and some curdled milk?
md
response 150 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 29 20:46 UTC 1998

*Sounds* incredibly stupid, but I'll have to go see for myself.  
Bloom's book is about "intentional misreading."  Fairly controversial 
at the time, pretty bland now.

SAVING PRIVATE RYAN (B) -- Tom Hanks is excellent in this movie, but
despite its celebrated "realism" the movie is filled with cliches.  
It even has an example of the "It Was Written" rule, which appeared
notably in Lawrence of Arabia: Lawrence risks his life to save a man
everyone else says is doomed, just to prove that "nothing is written"
(i.e., in the Book of Fate), and then ends up having to shoot the man 
himself later in the movie.  The John Williams score, complete with 
piously noble chorus vocalising wordlessly, gives the game away.  
High-grade kitsch, if you like that sort of thing.  But Tom Hanks is 
fantastic, despite everything.  

Recent rental: ZERO EFFECT (B-) -- The casting was awful, but it's an
interesting idea.  A postmodern Sherlock Holmes and his disaffected
Watson.
llanarth
response 151 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 29 23:11 UTC 1998

I *really* liked _City Of Angels_ and the soundtrack rocks too.
nsiddall
response 152 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 30 22:18 UTC 1998

"Stranger than Paradise", yes, that's it.  Saw it years ago.  One of the
characters listens to Screaming Jay Hawkins constantly on her walkman.  I
guess because of that, Jarmusch got to know Screaming Jay, and he appeared
as an actor in another movie, "Mystery Train".  He played a hotel clerk,
and did a good job, and was an interesting character.  Soundtrack for that
movie was Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins, etc.  And in "Down by Law", Tom
Waits did music and acted a major part, and did brilliantly in both.
These are all great movies.
md
response 153 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jul 30 22:55 UTC 1998

THE NEGOTIATOR (B) -- Tries hard to be a thinking person's action
movie.  Samuel L. Jackson and Kevin Spacey are both excellent.
The story is even farther fetched than you expect such a movie to
be, but I still enjoyed it.
otter
response 154 of 290: Mark Unseen   Aug 1 06:25 UTC 1998

Rented "Daibolique" with Chazz Palminteri (woof!) and Sharon Stone. It's about
a man who is murdered by his wife and mistress, but turns up later, very much
alive. Whatever. Thing is, I could swear it's a remake of a movie I saw about
10 years ago, almost shot for shot. Can someone here help me out with the
title of the earlier one?
mcnally
response 155 of 290: Mark Unseen   Aug 1 07:18 UTC 1998

  "Diabolique"

  the recent (94? 95?) film was a remake of the French classic starring
  Simone Signoret..
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   106-130   131-155   156-180   181-205 
 206-230   231-255   256-280   281-290       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss