| You are not logged in. Login Now | register | search | |||||||||
|
| |||
| Author | Message | ||
| 12 new of 142 responses total. | |||
|
klga |
We are crushed, too! | ||
|
albaugh |
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:56:05 -0400 From: CNN Breaking News <BreakingNews@MAIL.CNN.COM> Senate passes legislation to ban what critics call "partial-birth" abortion. President Bush has said he will sign bill. | ||
|
tod |
This response has been erased.
| ||
|
bhelliom |
This was inevitable. | ||
|
tod |
This response has been erased.
| ||
|
murph |
The Kurds probably think that the Jeb Bush situation is more disgusting... | ||
|
tod |
This response has been erased.
| ||
|
gull |
Odd question I had: Does Jeb Bush's order effectively also force the husband to keep paying for her care? | ||
|
tod |
This response has been erased.
| ||
|
slynne |
Re#138 I think there is some money ($1.7 million) she was awarded as part of a law suit that is designated for her care. I dont know how much of that money is left but I imagine that enough is that her husband wont be financially burdened by her continued care. But that does bring up an interesting issue. I mean, what if there wasnt a law suit. Who *would* be responsible for paying for on going care? | ||
|
bhelliom |
I think she was removed to a different facility. If I remember correctly, it gives the courts the opportunity to also appoint a different gaurdian. The hopice is supposedly caring for her for free currently. | ||
|
willcome |
maudlin whores. | ||
|
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In |
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss