|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 270 responses total. |
mary
|
|
response 130 of 270:
| 
Aug 2 13:24 UTC 2003 |
The Dog House, on Gratiot, was my father's restaurant.
I grew up there.
|
twenex
|
|
response 131 of 270:
|
Aug 2 23:58 UTC 2003 |
View hidden response.
|
kenohki
|
|
response 132 of 270:
|
Aug 4 03:02 UTC 2003 |
Hello, I am Nathan Wilson, alias KenOhki; but you should already know that
from the topic. I live in Henderson, NC, a horrible place. I am 16 and
am bored here. I like messing with comps, watching anime, playing RPGs,
and all sorts of other geeky stuff. This is my first shell account although
I have used the bash shell in Linux often.
Emacs rocks.
I'm looking forward to being flamed--er, I mean discussing.
^_^_V
|
other
|
|
response 133 of 270:
|
Aug 4 03:16 UTC 2003 |
Welcome to Grex. It gets easier(TM).
|
polytarp
|
|
response 134 of 270:
|
Aug 4 03:26 UTC 2003 |
Nathan Wilson is a kerl.
|
aruba
|
|
response 135 of 270:
|
Aug 4 03:37 UTC 2003 |
Hi Nathan - welcome to Grex!
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 136 of 270:
|
Aug 4 04:13 UTC 2003 |
I never thought of anime as all that geeky-- just sort of quirky. I
like it. So what anime is your fave, Nathan?
|
polytarp
|
|
response 137 of 270:
|
Aug 4 07:00 UTC 2003 |
Why are you a bigot?
|
novomit
|
|
response 138 of 270:
|
Aug 4 11:51 UTC 2003 |
Emacs sucks. It's *vi* that rocks. .
|
kip
|
|
response 139 of 270:
|
Aug 4 14:21 UTC 2003 |
If you're not going to use Emacs, at least use *vim* instead of plain *vi*.
|
flem
|
|
response 140 of 270:
|
Aug 4 15:08 UTC 2003 |
At this point, I can use vim on about 90% of the systems I log into, but
there's still 10% where it's useful to be familiar with plain vi.
|
novomit
|
|
response 141 of 270:
|
Aug 4 15:33 UTC 2003 |
Sorry folks, it's plain vi for me. Too used to it to consider another editor.
|
remmers
|
|
response 142 of 270:
|
Aug 4 15:38 UTC 2003 |
Being bi-editorial, I like both emacs and vi/vim. How's that for weird?
(Actually, I find the vim default configuration that comes with some
linux distributions to be distinctly irritating -- tries to be helpful
in various ways that I don't want and only serve to annoy me. How
Microsoftish!)
|
novomit
|
|
response 143 of 270:
|
Aug 4 15:48 UTC 2003 |
I agree with the second paragraph. I prefer an editor that does what i want
it to do rather than what the programmers assume I will want it to.
|
tod
|
|
response 144 of 270:
|
Aug 4 16:26 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
lynne
|
|
response 145 of 270:
|
Aug 4 17:38 UTC 2003 |
<waits for bru to condole with remmers about being bi>
|
tod
|
|
response 146 of 270:
|
Aug 4 17:52 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
novomit
|
|
response 147 of 270:
|
Aug 4 18:49 UTC 2003 |
Well said, old boy!
|
cross
|
|
response 148 of 270:
|
Aug 4 18:54 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
glenda
|
|
response 149 of 270:
|
Aug 4 19:21 UTC 2003 |
Straight vi for me. I want an editor to do what I tell it to, not what it
thinks I want it to.
|
dcat
|
|
response 150 of 270:
|
Aug 4 21:26 UTC 2003 |
"VI is to EMACS as masturbation is to making love:
effective and always available but probably not your first choice..."
That said, I use, and like using, both.
|
tod
|
|
response 151 of 270:
|
Aug 4 21:27 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
scott
|
|
response 152 of 270:
|
Aug 5 00:28 UTC 2003 |
Seems like vim will behave like vi if you use classic vi commands. The only
thing that ever annoys me about vim setups is the use of color for various
context things; I usually end up turning it off.
|
remmers
|
|
response 153 of 270:
|
Aug 5 01:29 UTC 2003 |
Yes, that's the annoyance that I had in mind.
|
russ
|
|
response 154 of 270:
|
Aug 5 02:36 UTC 2003 |
vi or die.
|