|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 48 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 13 of 48:
| 
Aug 12 11:38 UTC 2017 |
re #12
Don't hate the player; hate the game
|
nharmon
|
|
response 14 of 48:
|
Aug 21 19:43 UTC 2017 |
After watching videos on Liveleak.com, I am convinced that jvmv is telling
the truth about his country.
|
tod
|
|
response 15 of 48:
|
Aug 23 13:12 UTC 2017 |
link plz
|
walkman
|
|
response 16 of 48:
|
Aug 31 12:21 UTC 2017 |
Jvmv is a bot created to simulate a mentally challenged manure scooper.
|
tod
|
|
response 17 of 48:
|
Sep 1 03:16 UTC 2017 |
Impressive and great emulation
|
walkman
|
|
response 18 of 48:
|
Sep 5 16:56 UTC 2017 |
The bot was created by team that brought us the Atari Mindlink and
Lawnmowerman 2: Beyond Cyberspace.
|
tod
|
|
response 19 of 48:
|
Sep 8 18:54 UTC 2017 |
Not to be confused with IntelLink nor CyberspaceInc
|
jvmv
|
|
response 20 of 48:
|
Nov 23 03:25 UTC 2017 |
F*ck you ALL! Bunch of assholes! We'll soon bombard your fucked country!
|
tod
|
|
response 21 of 48:
|
Nov 23 11:35 UTC 2017 |
re #20
Happy Thanksgiving to you too, Andy
|
jvmv
|
|
response 22 of 48:
|
Jan 29 22:59 UTC 2018 |
re #21 hey SON of a BITCH! you're pathetic. you're as pathetic as trump,
i seriously believe you could take his place. i don't know which one is
the most idiot!
|
tod
|
|
response 23 of 48:
|
Jan 30 05:19 UTC 2018 |
re #22
Good to see you, too. Happy New Year Gringo
|
jvmv
|
|
response 24 of 48:
|
Jan 30 18:52 UTC 2018 |
re 23
drink jizz and suck a dick you cum guzzling cock sucker.
|
cross
|
|
response 25 of 48:
|
Feb 5 01:58 UTC 2018 |
Wow. So homophobic.
|
walkman
|
|
response 26 of 48:
|
Feb 10 00:34 UTC 2018 |
Someone is REALLY preoccupied with male sexuality.
LOL!!!
"i don't know which is the most idiot"
We should hold a contest to see who is the "most idiot."
|
tod
|
|
response 27 of 48:
|
Feb 10 01:34 UTC 2018 |
which witch is which
can i be the more idiot
|
mijk
|
|
response 28 of 48:
|
Feb 10 18:50 UTC 2018 |
Being an idiot won't get you laid. ;)
|
tod
|
|
response 29 of 48:
|
Feb 12 04:08 UTC 2018 |
re #28
Whew!
|
tfurrows
|
|
response 30 of 48:
|
Jan 14 00:08 UTC 2019 |
|
walkman
|
|
response 31 of 48:
|
Jan 20 00:21 UTC 2019 |
I know right?
|
walkman
|
|
response 32 of 48:
|
Sep 25 11:49 UTC 2019 |
Impeachment will backfire.
Let's watch it unfold.
|
walkman
|
|
response 33 of 48:
|
Oct 5 23:34 UTC 2019 |
How's it unfolding so far? I wrote that last comment 10 days ago.
Then again since Grex is dead I'm just talking to myself.
Looks like we now know:
1. Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly
eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand
knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This magically before the
whistleblower comes forward with no direct, first hand-hand knowledge.
Do you think this opens the door to endless whistleblowers in the
future? Or will the loophole magically close once impeachment is
concluded? LMAO
2. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has
informed Schiff, the California Democrat and chairman of the
Intelligence Committee, that he will not forward a whistleblower s
complaint to the committee, as required by law.
What is he hiding? That there's nothing of substance?
There is a process for whistleblowers in such situations, one that has
been established by federal law. A whistleblower must first submit a
complaint to the IG, who determines whether it s an urgent concern and
credible. If so, the DNI shall forward the complaint to the
congressional intelligence committees. Why go around the process? ;)
Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/09/18/mystery-adam-
schiff-whistleblower-takes-dangerous-new-turn/
3. Despite the fact that Rep. Adam Schiff claimed otherwise, he met with
the whistleblower before the report became public. Coaching, colluding
and interfering with the 2020 election.
4. One of Schiff s staffers took a trip to Ukraine in August to meet
with and speak to their former president, Petro Poroshenko (strong ties
to Obama Administration). Does conducting a secret meeting with a
foreign leader who was duly replaced by a rival in an election count as
foreign meddling? Pot/Kettle
Speaking of which,a 2016 Politico report indicated that a Democratic
National Committee operative worked with Ukrainian government officials
to dig up Russia-related opposition research on Donald Trump. The
operative later shared that information with the DNC and the Clinton
campaign.
Karl Marx: Accuse your enemy of what you are doing, as you are doing it
to create confusion .
5. 61 percent of Americans oppose impeaching Trump: poll
https://nypost.com/2019/06/12/61-percent-of-americans-oppose-impeaching-
trump-poll/
6. My own conjecture: Once the House votes for impeachment, it will go
to the Senate where it will likely be voted down. Controlled by
Republicans. Trump uses the incident to portray himself as a martyr. His
supporters will crawl over glass and fire to vote for him again. End of
story. Of course, Trump has many neocon enemies in the Senate, so I
could be wrong. Regardless of the outcome, I'm sure my life will not
change in any significant way.
#EatTheBabies for the climate.
|
papa
|
|
response 34 of 48:
|
Oct 6 21:02 UTC 2019 |
resp:33
That sounds about right. The Dems are so obssessed with impeaching Trump,
they are guaranteeing his reelection.
|
walkman
|
|
response 35 of 48:
|
Oct 7 10:50 UTC 2019 |
#34 Democrat voters should be upset. They voted for people who
promised change. All they got were more promises but of impeachment.
What have Democrats done since January 2017? Nothing I know of.
"Oh but Trump will never sign..." would be the excuse.
What happened to "reaching across the isle"? Making deals? That is
what they are there for. Otherwise, why bother voting?
Democrat voters were betrayed by their own party. I wonder if this
will get people thinking about the Democrat Plantation. Just keep
voting and they will keep promising.
When will people finally decide they've had enough and start
exploring third parties? It seems like the lock down on a 2 party
system is tighter that ever.
I've felt from the beginning that Trump isn't a Republican. To me,
he seems like a populist Reagan Republican/Libertarian hybrid.
Definitely not a fundamentalist GOP or neocon; though ignorant (or
disingenuous) critics almost always portray him that way. He
definitely has plenty of room for criticism but an honest approach
always has more impact.
Why are his supporters not asking what happened to the wall? What
about his out of control spending? Space Force - what happened to
smaller government and conservative spending? What about not closing
on those trade deals? Plenty more to discuss. But with the extreme
polarization, no one wants to discuss anything without turning into
a rage monster.
|
papa
|
|
response 36 of 48:
|
Oct 7 13:13 UTC 2019 |
resp:35
I think a two-party system is good, but the US needs two different parties
than the corrupt ones we have now.
|
tod
|
|
response 37 of 48:
|
Oct 12 04:47 UTC 2019 |
June 13, 2013 (Chula Vista) During a visit to Southwestern College in the San
Diego area on Monday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi fielded questions
from local media on Edward Snowden. Snowden has fled the country over fears
of possible espionage charges for leaking classified documents revealing that
the National Security Administration (NSA) has been accessing phone records
for millions of Americans.
The former House Speaker called for a balance between liberty and security...
...She added that if there was someone leaking classified information that
is against the law and that we have a responsibility as a country to balance
security and liberty, privacy and strength.
In her view, we might not like the laws, and may not even not voted for them,
but they are the law.
Asked if she viewed him as a criminal or hero, Pelosi said, No matter who he
is, if he has leaked classified information, thats against the law.
~~~~
Not sure why I dug that up. Maybe because she had that PATRIOT ACT gravy
train for a long time and nothing has changed.
|