|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 203 responses total. |
keesan
|
|
response 129 of 203:
| 
Feb 16 15:37 UTC 2007 |
Ubuntu does not work (out of the box) on much of our hardware. It insisted
on 128MB RAM and 2GB (to install to) and could not find the ISA modem or sound
card. Dumped you right into X (I had trouble figuring out how to get back
out). Did not have kermit or opera or zgv. We got it to dial once by
manually configuring and removed it.
|
cross
|
|
response 130 of 203:
|
Feb 16 16:47 UTC 2007 |
What you do is pathological.
|
keesan
|
|
response 131 of 203:
|
Feb 16 17:28 UTC 2007 |
Cross, please stop picking on me. If what I write annoys you, put me in your
twit filter instead.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 132 of 203:
|
Feb 16 17:37 UTC 2007 |
Some of us wouldn't get anything done if we had to put as much time into
it as Sindi does.
|
cross
|
|
response 133 of 203:
|
Feb 16 19:58 UTC 2007 |
Regarding #131; I'm not picking on you. I'm just saying that what you do is
pathologically different from what the vast majority of Ubuntu users do. I
don't understand why you'd pitch in about what business users do anyway, since
you're so far removed from that case that it's silly. Btw- in Computer
Science, the word `pathological' does not have the same meaning it has in
criminal justice.
You should also learn to use paragraphs.
|
keesan
|
|
response 134 of 203:
|
Feb 16 23:34 UTC 2007 |
So what does pathological mean in computer science?
|
cross
|
|
response 135 of 203:
|
Feb 16 23:50 UTC 2007 |
Essentially, pushed to an extreme. So, for instance, some times we say that
algorithms exhibit `pathological behavior' if we hit some sort of edge case
that greatly increases the algorithm's running time or something of that
nature.
|
easlern
|
|
response 136 of 203:
|
Feb 17 00:04 UTC 2007 |
Counter to understanding maybe? Patho = abnormal and logos = knowledge I
think.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 137 of 203:
|
Feb 17 00:54 UTC 2007 |
It's a good thing cross didn't use another, related term to describe
Sindi's behavior. But the insult potential of describing someone
else as "the degenerate case" would be pretty unmistakable, even if
it wasn't meant in a critical sense.
|
cross
|
|
response 138 of 203:
|
Feb 17 04:18 UTC 2007 |
Hmm, I tend not to think of it like that. For instance, when someone says,
``the pathological case of quicksort'' one is typically referring to an input
that gives an O(n^2) running time (ie, one that is quadratic in the size of
the input). Rather, that's the worst case running time for a pathological
input.
|
maus
|
|
response 139 of 203:
|
Feb 17 06:32 UTC 2007 |
I will say that it seems to me that keesan exerts more effort than it
would be worth to the majority of Linux/BSD users to get a working
system, and that the hardware on which keesan does this costs
significantly more in having to fiddle with it than it would to replace
with something more recent and more supportable (one for which
replacement parts can be obtained easily and which the OEM has not
disavowed).
This is not to say that everyone should dump their older machines, but
there is a threshold age beyond which a machine demands more effort than
it is worth. I lump 32bit Sparcstations, pre-pentium 2 PCs and System7
and earlier Macs into this category.
|
keesan
|
|
response 140 of 203:
|
Feb 17 13:13 UTC 2007 |
keesan spends almost no money on entertainment. And provides or sets up 10-20
free computer systems a year to friends, neighbors, etc., who otherwise would
not have any computers, and learns a lot, and gets a system that is much more
pleasant to work with than anything that could be purchased.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 141 of 203:
|
Feb 17 14:03 UTC 2007 |
"More pleasant" being a subjective term that, as you define it, would not
apply to the vast majority of computer users.
|
johnnie
|
|
response 142 of 203:
|
Feb 17 15:16 UTC 2007 |
Well, the setting-it-up part is no doubt a big PITA, but the end result
is likely pleasing, particularly if the ultimate user is concerned about
the simple things (such as email and word-processing).
|
keesan
|
|
response 143 of 203:
|
Feb 17 15:42 UTC 2007 |
I enjoy learning to set it up and I hate GUIS. I just figured out how to set
up 38MB of linux with three browsers, and kermit and a few other useful things
which includes X and a window manager and email and text editor.....
for someone who only wants to use it for browsing and email. Her ex husband
liked what I set up for him. She also wants Office Suite which is no fun at
all to set up and wants 121MB typical (Office 97) plus the 150MB of minimal
Win98.
|
cross
|
|
response 144 of 203:
|
Feb 18 00:58 UTC 2007 |
You're free to hate whatever you want. My concern is that, when you set
someone up with some recycled computer, that you inject your own biases and
potentially prevent them from doing useful stuff in a way that's compatible
with the mainstream. Certainly, installing Windows 98 on someone's computer
isn't a good idea; it's ridiuled with security problems. You'd be better off
figuring out how to install Ubuntu or something lik ethat.
|
keesan
|
|
response 145 of 203:
|
Feb 18 01:20 UTC 2007 |
Why is Ubuntu better than Slackware? Win98 is only to run WORD on (not all
of Office Suite, I was told. She just can't tell them apart). Linux for
internet. With Opera. No Shockwave Flash or noises. Good for email.
I am setting it up to go into X directly, with a menu.
Ubuntu does not work well on old hardware. It could not even find our modem
or sound card, and it wastes most of the memory on unneeded daemons and boots
slowly and runs slowly.
|
cross
|
|
response 146 of 203:
|
Feb 18 01:35 UTC 2007 |
Ubuntu is easy for non-experts to use, in addition to experts.
|
keesan
|
|
response 147 of 203:
|
Feb 18 03:04 UTC 2007 |
What I set up is extremely easy to use. Ctrl-ESC or mouse for a menu, or type
m for a menu, then type the first letter of the program or use a mouse if you
prefer or type the whole program out. Looks something like Windows but much
faster and does not crash. Customized.
|
maus
|
|
response 148 of 203:
|
Feb 18 05:53 UTC 2007 |
Let me rephrase what Cross was saying: Ubuntu is easy for non-experts
*OUT OF THE BOX*. It does not require expertise to set up, it does not
require expertise to maintain, it provides a clear upgrade path and a
straightforward source of application software. I would say that all of
the above is doubly true for SLED/OpenSuse (though Ubuntu seems to be a
little bit faster). Ditto RHEL/CentOS. Even bog-standard Slackware is
appropriate, as it is a common, well-known and supported environment.
The skills learned on these mainstream systems are more portable and
more useful outside the network of you and your friends. People learn to
use tools that implement and expose standard interfaces, and learn to do
things in ways that are valuable elsewhere. Yes there is value in
learning how to do things with minimal tools, but it puts into place a
barrier to use that reinforces the notion that Linux/UNIX is
unnecessarily hard.
|
twenex
|
|
response 149 of 203:
|
Feb 18 13:21 UTC 2007 |
Jeff was just about to ask Sindi why she favours referring to herself in the
third person when you switched to using first.
Why does Sindi hate GUIs?
Jeff agrees with Cross; for the kinds of things one can do with Win98 these
days, a GUI linux distro would be better for most people than Win98. There
are several distros Jeff or Sindi could use which are low-powered and have
GUIs.
Jeff agrees that Sindi has a right not to use GUI's if she chooses not to,
but surely Sindi realises that she is not at all in the majority in this?
Cross was right to use the word "pathological" in the sense he used it, but
Jeff agrees with whomever pointed out that Cross should have explained his
use of the word.
|
cross
|
|
response 150 of 203:
|
Feb 18 15:11 UTC 2007 |
Dan wonders why people insist on calling him Cross and not just, you know,
Dan. Or even dan.
|
twenex
|
|
response 151 of 203:
|
Feb 18 15:29 UTC 2007 |
Jeff calls Dan {C,c}ross because that's his login name.
|
twenex
|
|
response 152 of 203:
|
Feb 18 15:29 UTC 2007 |
And surname.
|
cross
|
|
response 153 of 203:
|
Feb 18 15:33 UTC 2007 |
Dan understands that. But Dan would sort of prefer Dan.
|
