|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 248 responses total. |
davel
|
|
response 125 of 248:
| 
Nov 5 14:47 UTC 2002 |
(So was I.)
|
albaugh
|
|
response 126 of 248:
|
Nov 7 19:56 UTC 2002 |
I have to confirm that I, too, am seeing long delays in e-mail delivery to
grex, something I didn't used to see. There may not have been anyone
consciously done by anyone, but something could have changed in the
environment...
|
russ
|
|
response 127 of 248:
|
Nov 9 00:15 UTC 2002 |
The modem on -3596 is very noisy. Is there any chance of
replacing it with the one formerly on -2517 and seeing if
matters improve?
|
scott
|
|
response 128 of 248:
|
Nov 9 04:02 UTC 2002 |
Trouble is I don't know which modem was on 2517. :(
|
tpryan
|
|
response 129 of 248:
|
Nov 9 21:04 UTC 2002 |
Take a cell phone to the pumpkin. Dial the number.
Notice with one answers.
|
scott
|
|
response 130 of 248:
|
Nov 10 00:31 UTC 2002 |
"was".
|
russ
|
|
response 131 of 248:
|
Nov 15 12:35 UTC 2002 |
Mail from at least one system to Grex is being
dropped silently.
|
keesan
|
|
response 132 of 248:
|
Nov 15 14:50 UTC 2002 |
Mail is still arriving late - took more than 12 hours - so perhaps yours is
still on the way. One person wrote me that three of his mails to me bounced
due to the connection to grex timing out.
|
keesan
|
|
response 133 of 248:
|
Nov 15 17:12 UTC 2002 |
The person whose mail arrived late said she had tried several times yesterday
to email and it kept bouncing. She finally phoned my answering machine.
She does not get these bounce messages when mailing other places.
THis makes it sort of a problem to use email at grex for business purposes.
Right now email is working fine.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 134 of 248:
|
Nov 17 02:04 UTC 2002 |
Picospan will not accept my full title. As Autocrat of all Russias, I deserve,
expect, and demand better.
Fix it, or I will be upset.
|
janc
|
|
response 135 of 248:
|
Nov 17 14:37 UTC 2002 |
I doubt it.
|
remmers
|
|
response 136 of 248:
|
Nov 17 15:24 UTC 2002 |
I move that a name length limit of 48 characters be implemented.
|
keesan
|
|
response 137 of 248:
|
Nov 17 16:17 UTC 2002 |
Or a way to wrap lines in names so that they don't split mid-word.
|
slynne
|
|
response 138 of 248:
|
Nov 17 21:35 UTC 2002 |
Names wrap well in backtalk.
|
janc
|
|
response 139 of 248:
|
Nov 17 21:54 UTC 2002 |
Aside from ugly wrappinng, Picospan seems to have no problem displaying long
names.
|
other
|
|
response 140 of 248:
|
Nov 17 22:32 UTC 2002 |
uh huh.
|
davel
|
|
response 141 of 248:
|
Nov 18 01:00 UTC 2002 |
AFAICS, Picospan doesn't wrap long names at all. The wrap is imposed by the
terminal emulation used by the user.
|
remmers
|
|
response 142 of 248:
|
Nov 18 02:00 UTC 2002 |
Are we having fun yet?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 143 of 248:
|
Nov 18 02:05 UTC 2002 |
They can't? What do you do in the perennial hypothetical case where someone
posts a credit card number?
|
other
|
|
response 144 of 248:
|
Nov 18 02:08 UTC 2002 |
uh huh
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 145 of 248:
|
Nov 18 02:32 UTC 2002 |
Heh...
|
janc
|
|
response 146 of 248:
|
Nov 18 04:56 UTC 2002 |
In that perennial hypothetical case, cfadm or root edits the response.
Incidentally, they can edit the pseudonym too.
|
davel
|
|
response 147 of 248:
|
Nov 18 13:12 UTC 2002 |
Re 142: I guess we must be, John. Why else is this continuing?
|
jhudson
|
|
response 148 of 248:
|
Nov 19 18:18 UTC 2002 |
lol
|
fuzzman
|
|
response 149 of 248:
|
Nov 20 17:28 UTC 2002 |
wierdness:
fuzzman@cyberspace.org's password:
Warning: Remote host failed or refused to allocate a pseudo tty.
Warning: no access to tty (Bad file number).
Thus no job control in this shell.
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
stty: TCGETS: Operation not supported on socket
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
TERM: Undefined variable.
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
Is someone hogging ttys?
|
