You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   96-120   121-133     
 
Author Message
13 new of 133 responses total.
madmike
response 121 of 133: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 18:06 UTC 2008

...kinda' like cyklone was talking about in #55(?) I suppose...
cross
response 122 of 133: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 19:32 UTC 2008

Something like that is certainly possible....
remmers
response 123 of 133: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 21:24 UTC 2008

Re resp:120 - Hmmm...  I'm glad somebody is reviving this thread.  In
resp:85 and resp:88 I detailed my objections to such a rating system
and proposed a more individualized alternative that would allow users to
fine-tune their filtering to their own tastes.  Just to remind y'all.
madmike
response 124 of 133: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 01:08 UTC 2008

Thanks for the redirect remmers. I get what you're saying. Perhaps 
there could be several filtering "cliques". For example one could tune 
in using the administrators clique or the moderator clique, the newbie 
clique or the self admitted twit clique. Imagine the hoops that could 
be constructed to determine who may be admitted to a particular group.
You could collect group labels as sort of merit badges. 

You might even allow for revoking of group membership based on fellow 
cliquee votes. 'Cyber-Survivor' as it where.

For the record I think the MySpace model is okay for them but too 
restrictive for grex. 

I really dig that I can post to Coop. And I did not even have to pass a 
psyc test. ;-)
naftee
response 125 of 133: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 02:17 UTC 2008

this is grex's most interesting conference.
tsty
response 126 of 133: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 07:13 UTC 2009

i noticed that the groups stuff is (seems to be) un-updated. ???
  
cross
response 127 of 133: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 14:34 UTC 2009

Which groups?
tsty
response 128 of 133: Mark Unseen   Feb 6 05:53 UTC 2009

well,  i thought i'd be int eh verified group, for one example.
don;t wanna get a buncha ppl too upset.
krj
response 129 of 133: Mark Unseen   Feb 6 17:34 UTC 2009

davel
response 130 of 133: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 15:53 UTC 2009

eh?
mary
response 131 of 133: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 23:40 UTC 2009

Dave!  Missed you 'round here.  And at the Lighthouse.
krj
response 132 of 133: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 16:29 UTC 2009

There seems to be something in FrontTalk where a character sequence
which I expect to result in a cancelled posting instead causes 
a blank posting to happen.  Not sure what that sequence is.
But it probably involves a CTRL-C.
cross
response 133 of 133: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 17:39 UTC 2009

Hmm; that's weird...
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   96-120   121-133     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss