You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-12   12-36   37-61   62-86   87-95      
 
Author Message
25 new of 95 responses total.
tsty
response 12 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 06:20 UTC 2009

  
unicorn! goo dto heare from you ...
  
i nominate unicorn and kentn
  
steve
response 13 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 23 22:08 UTC 2009

I am running again.

katie
response 14 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 00:20 UTC 2009

No, thank you. Thanks for thinking of me.
tsty
response 15 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 00:45 UTC 2009

  
tnx steve ... sorry about katie theough.
  
tsty
response 16 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 01:47 UTC 2009

  
ok unicorn, i;ll consider 11 to be a self-nomination and if others
disagree, then i nominate unicorn.
  
kentn
response 17 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 14:46 UTC 2009

I'll give it a shot.
unicorn
response 18 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 16:47 UTC 2009

Actually, tod nominated me in #2, and you nominated me in #12, so
your nomination in #16 makes 3.  ;)
remmers
response 19 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 16:59 UTC 2009

Joe Gelinas asked if I'd run the election this time around, which
basically involves setting up and running the voting software.  I've not
been a staff member for a few years, but I'm very familiar with the
voting software - having written it - so I'll be happy to do it.

Since Grex has been down for a couple of days, I respectfully suggest
extending the nomination period correspondingly.

Voting runs from December 1 through 15.  Nominees have through November
30 to accept a nomination, which they must do in this item.  You also
have to be a member in good standing by the time the polls open in order
to be a candidate.

denise
response 20 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 17:07 UTC 2009

Thanks for helping out, John! And I agree that we should extend the 
nomination period since Grex had been down for a couple days.
tsty
response 21 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 18:38 UTC 2009

  
tnx remmers ... and i agree with the extehnsion ...
  
please link to agora - tia
  
denise
response 22 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 22:03 UTC 2009

Just as a reminder: Any more nominations to be made should be done
within  the next day or so [extending the deadline by 2 days since Grex
had been  down earlier this week]. As remmmers mentioned, we have til
late November  to accept or decline nominations that have been posted
here in this item.
richard
response 23 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 22:52 UTC 2009

as stated in item #256, I think anyone running for the board should 
only do so if they have a clear idea of what they want for grex.  If 
you are willing to help wind down the company over the next year.and 
consider future options for what should happen with the bbs and the 
hardware thats good.  But grex doesn't need board members who are 
running reluctantly, who won't attend the meetings and won't consider 
being treasurer, or secretary or anything that involves doing any of 
the work.  
cyklone
response 24 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 00:43 UTC 2009

Thanks for the nomination, but I, like nate, must decline for
employment-related reasons.
jep
response 25 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 04:01 UTC 2009

I believe I see enough nominees who have accepted to fill the open spots. 
Denise, Chuck and STeve are running for re-election;  Kent has nominated 
himself, and Todd Plesco, Glenda Andre and John Remmers have been 
nominated and not declined.  There will be a full Board.  There will even 
be a contest if Todd, Glenda and/or John accept.  I find this encouraging.
cross
response 26 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 05:26 UTC 2009

I nominate Sindi Keesan and Rane Curl.
nharmon
response 27 of 95: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 14:54 UTC 2009

I nominate Kevin Nichols.
jgelinas
response 28 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 22:08 UTC 2009

OK, so grex has been down for four days.  Let's extend the acceptance
period for four days, and the election will be similarly delayed.
scholar
response 29 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 22:11 UTC 2009

I nominate myself.
denise
response 30 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 23:03 UTC 2009

I nominate krj.
twinkie
response 31 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 23:22 UTC 2009

I appreciate the nomination, but I decline.

(I'm also ineligible, anyway.)

richard
response 32 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 23:26 UTC 2009

Aruba has apparently emailed staff to the effect that renewal notices 
for memberships have not gone out in over a year and as a result 
virtually everyone's memberships have lapsed.  You have to have paid 
three months current dues to run according to the bylaws.  So not only 
are few, if any, of these nominees currently eligible to run, but 
there is the question as to who, if anybody, is eligible to vote.  You 
have to be a member to have a binding vote.

It seems like this election will therefore need to be postponed into 
the new year.  Which means grex may start 2010 without a board since 
even the sitting board members cannot serve, and the positions 
considered vacant, if *their* memberships have lapsed.  
scholar
response 33 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 23:51 UTC 2009

tod
response 34 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 2 00:40 UTC 2009

re #25
I was not nominated.
jep
response 35 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 2 05:17 UTC 2009

re resp:34: You were, in resp:11.
richard
response 36 of 95: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 00:45 UTC 2009

so what happens since no elections will have taken place before the 
end of the year?  current board members with expiring terms will 
continue or does that require amending the bylaws? 
 0-12   12-36   37-61   62-86   87-95      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss