|
Grex > Agora47 > #52: House passes ban on "partial birth" abortions | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 142 responses total. |
lynne
|
|
response 118 of 142:
| 
Oct 12 14:28 UTC 2003 |
re 116, 117: I was referring specifically to chemical/pharmaceutical
companies, as they are the only ones of interest to me. I'm not sure that
there is a union for chemists. However, I am sure that this is company
policy at Merck. Be warned that I am now adding Mr klg to my twit filter,
since I find their writing style more irritating than their content justifies.
|
slynne
|
|
response 119 of 142:
|
Oct 12 14:53 UTC 2003 |
How come folks often seem unable to add anyone to their twit filter
without announcing it to everyone else.
|
remmers
|
|
response 120 of 142:
|
Oct 12 15:01 UTC 2003 |
There might be lots of folks who filter people but who never
announce it. Of course, by definition that's something that
we'll never get a handle on in a public forum.
|
slynne
|
|
response 121 of 142:
|
Oct 12 15:25 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, I know. My original comment was "how come folks always seem
to..." and then I thought about it. I mean, if someone adds someone to
their twit filter and doesnt announce it, I wouldnt notice.
|
other
|
|
response 122 of 142:
|
Oct 12 16:13 UTC 2003 |
It's fun to tweak the filteree by announcing that you're filtering them,
which makes their response to the announcement tantalizingly invisible.
|
slynne
|
|
response 123 of 142:
|
Oct 12 16:38 UTC 2003 |
That's it! I am putting *everyone* on my twit list. Now all responses
in grex will be tantalizingly invisible which means, of course, that
they will all be tantalizing. Whew. Is it getting HOT in here?
|
happyboy
|
|
response 124 of 142:
|
Oct 12 19:23 UTC 2003 |
that didn't tweak me, slynne. sorry...and i still
love you even though you're mean. oh wait, you can't
read this because you're filtering and stuff.
HA HA HA!
(p.s. we miss you, buy a plane ticket please...)
|
remmers
|
|
response 125 of 142:
|
Oct 12 19:24 UTC 2003 |
(I heard that slynne soaks her false teeth in beer overnight.)
|
happyboy
|
|
response 126 of 142:
|
Oct 12 19:31 UTC 2003 |
(only when she sleeps nekkid on the front porch)
|
slynne
|
|
response 127 of 142:
|
Oct 12 20:25 UTC 2003 |
Oooh Ooh. Grex is sooooo tantalizing and exciting all of a sudden.
|
lynne
|
|
response 128 of 142:
|
Oct 12 22:51 UTC 2003 |
Somehow, it seemed rude not to let klg know I was ignoring he/she/it/them. :)
(man, the things you miss not living in Ypsi...) :)
|
klg
|
|
response 129 of 142:
|
Oct 13 01:18 UTC 2003 |
We are crushed!
|
gull
|
|
response 130 of 142:
|
Oct 13 01:21 UTC 2003 |
If I were filtering I wouldn't tell the filteree, but that's because I'm
paranoid enough to worry about what they would say about me behind my
back.
|
klga
|
|
response 131 of 142:
|
Oct 13 01:22 UTC 2003 |
We are crushed, too!
|
albaugh
|
|
response 132 of 142:
|
Oct 22 17:08 UTC 2003 |
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:56:05 -0400
From: CNN Breaking News <BreakingNews@MAIL.CNN.COM>
Senate passes legislation to ban what critics call "partial-birth" abortion.
President Bush has said he will sign bill.
|
tod
|
|
response 133 of 142:
|
Oct 22 17:10 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 134 of 142:
|
Oct 23 16:24 UTC 2003 |
This was inevitable.
|
tod
|
|
response 135 of 142:
|
Oct 23 16:27 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
murph
|
|
response 136 of 142:
|
Oct 23 18:56 UTC 2003 |
The Kurds probably think that the Jeb Bush situation is more disgusting...
|
tod
|
|
response 137 of 142:
|
Oct 23 20:07 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 138 of 142:
|
Oct 23 20:10 UTC 2003 |
Odd question I had: Does Jeb Bush's order effectively also force the
husband to keep paying for her care?
|
tod
|
|
response 139 of 142:
|
Oct 23 20:16 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
slynne
|
|
response 140 of 142:
|
Oct 23 20:31 UTC 2003 |
Re#138 I think there is some money ($1.7 million) she was awarded as
part of a law suit that is designated for her care. I dont know how
much of that money is left but I imagine that enough is that her
husband wont be financially burdened by her continued care. But that
does bring up an interesting issue. I mean, what if there wasnt a law
suit. Who *would* be responsible for paying for on going care?
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 141 of 142:
|
Oct 23 20:33 UTC 2003 |
I think she was removed to a different facility. If I remember
correctly, it gives the courts the opportunity to also appoint a
different gaurdian. The hopice is supposedly caring for her for free
currently.
|
willcome
|
|
response 142 of 142:
|
Nov 27 07:55 UTC 2003 |
maudlin whores.
|