|
Grex > Oldcoop > #101: Cyberspace Communications finances for January 2004 | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 155 responses total. |
jmsaul
|
|
response 116 of 155:
| 
Feb 14 15:04 UTC 2004 |
Re #114: Re-read my original post. Yes, you can convert them -- but you
can't convert them instantly, and there will always be more.
|
ryan
|
|
response 117 of 155:
|
Feb 14 16:26 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 118 of 155:
|
Feb 14 17:24 UTC 2004 |
When you write something intelligent. That's not going to happen anytime
soon.
|
jp2
|
|
response 119 of 155:
|
Feb 15 00:18 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 120 of 155:
|
Feb 15 01:19 UTC 2004 |
riddance
|
tod
|
|
response 121 of 155:
|
Feb 16 19:25 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
janc
|
|
response 122 of 155:
|
Feb 17 02:15 UTC 2004 |
Re 109: I resent the implication that I couldn't fix the disk. I did fix
the disk. I was up copying the data off a perfectly good disk so that it
could be cannibalized for parts to fix the disk that had died. Kip did the
actual cannibalization, so it was a group effort.
It's been a week since the vote was over, and some minds are still spinning
in a tight little circle: "Valerie is Satan. No free speech on Grex.
Valerie is Satan. No free speech on Grex. Valerie is Satan. No free
speech on Grex...." OK. OK. Take a valium. Get some sleep. Maybe some
breathing exercises. You'll do yourself an injury if you keep this up much
longer.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 123 of 155:
|
Feb 17 02:28 UTC 2004 |
Nothing a little breastmilk won't cure!
|
naftee
|
|
response 124 of 155:
|
Feb 17 04:04 UTC 2004 |
Just a little more sex...
|
rational
|
|
response 125 of 155:
|
Feb 17 04:14 UTC 2004 |
AND A LOT MORE FREEDOM RIBBON!
|
happyboy
|
|
response 126 of 155:
|
Feb 17 19:13 UTC 2004 |
re122: whatever, milquetoast.
|
tod
|
|
response 127 of 155:
|
Feb 17 22:09 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 128 of 155:
|
Feb 18 00:30 UTC 2004 |
re : 122
It's rather convenient to be condescending after the fact, when you've
basically got what you wanted, ne?
|
tod
|
|
response 129 of 155:
|
Feb 18 01:18 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 130 of 155:
|
Feb 18 01:50 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 131 of 155:
|
Feb 18 02:38 UTC 2004 |
Your second sentence in #129 proves that your complaints are farce: if
your words were really being censored, you'd not be able to claim that you
had been censored.
Until YOU stop scribbling your posts, you're little more than a hypocrit to
accuse Valerie of vandalism for removing her posts.
As has been said many times, you can re-enter your comments from any removed
items at any time.
|
rational
|
|
response 132 of 155:
|
Feb 18 02:39 UTC 2004 |
Joe, you really don't think people can be selectively censored? Why's it
impossible for some things they say to be censored and others not?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 133 of 155:
|
Feb 18 02:51 UTC 2004 |
Because censorship is general, aimed at either particular people, or
particular subjects. The removals here on grex were not targeted at people
nor at subjects. The people whose responses were removed can still post on
grex (and have, endlessly. :) The subjects of the responses can still be
discussed on grex. Just not in the original items.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 134 of 155:
|
Feb 18 03:16 UTC 2004 |
Keep up the lame justifications, gelinas. The fact of the matter is I can
*NEVER* repost the deleted items because (a) I don't have copies and (b) I
don't have a photographic memory. Sure, I could post something similar,
but MY ORIGINAL WORDS are now gone forever because some assholes voted
that valerie and jep's feelings were more important than mine. Those were
personal favors for favored persons, pure and simple. As the disfavored
person, I feel a loss over my words similar to a mourning and all you can
do is pretend nothing was lost. Fuck you.
If you can't see my point and acknowledge it then you are as insensitive
an asshole as certain grexers accuse mnetters of being.
|
rational
|
|
response 135 of 155:
|
Feb 18 03:20 UTC 2004 |
Was it hard to write that while wiping away tears, cyklone?
|
cyklone
|
|
response 136 of 155:
|
Feb 18 03:28 UTC 2004 |
No, I save my tears for more important things. This feels more like I was
robbed by a bunch of self-righteous senior citizens driving real slow
getaway cars. The sad part is not that I was robbed but that they took
something of inherent value to me.
|
rational
|
|
response 137 of 155:
|
Feb 18 03:29 UTC 2004 |
Oh, okay.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 138 of 155:
|
Feb 18 04:17 UTC 2004 |
Yes, I do see your point, and I acknowledge your loss, cyklone. That it hurts
doesn't make it censorship, though. That it was a personal favour for special
persons doesn't make it censorship.
I've been convinced that the deletions were wrong. I've NOT been convinced
that it was censorhip.
|
rational
|
|
response 139 of 155:
|
Feb 18 04:50 UTC 2004 |
Why'd you ban my address, putz?
|
anderyn
|
|
response 140 of 155:
|
Feb 18 12:07 UTC 2004 |
Cyklone, I am sorry that you felt so attached to your words that you feel pain
that they were removed. I suppose that I don't quite get this, since I work
as a copy editor and I write for publication -- if I were that attached to
what I wrote, even the stuff I really adore, I'd feel pain a LOT. Just because
you said it one way at one time doesn't mean that you can't get it really
close another time, as long as you have a forum that allows you to try again.
And I lost some information that was important to me (things like when Griffin
smiled first, etc. -- which I didn't keep in any diary, or save in a folder,
or anything else and which I can't replace by memory or any other means
(unless someone saved the text and are willing to share), but I am not half
as upset as you are.
|