You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   91-115   116-120     
 
Author Message
5 new of 120 responses total.
russ
response 116 of 120: Mark Unseen   Jul 13 04:02 UTC 2003

Re #114:  I'd venture that it means that a very large minority of
the voters think that we can use fresh blood in the "staff farm
team" and can't wait for the consensus process to bring names up
from the mass of users.
i
response 117 of 120: Mark Unseen   Jul 13 11:31 UTC 2003

Take the time - your vote really can make a difference.
jmsaul
response 118 of 120: Mark Unseen   Jul 13 15:14 UTC 2003

I think it means a lot of voters read this item and realized staff members
could already do it.

russ
response 119 of 120: Mark Unseen   Jul 14 22:12 UTC 2003

Re #118:  There certainly was some action, *while this motion was
pending*.  But will it continue?
jep
response 120 of 120: Mark Unseen   Jul 15 00:45 UTC 2003

My "yes" vote was made before I read the discussion here.  I didn't see 
that it made any difference whether I voted "yes" or "no", and so I 
didn't bother to change it.  I'm probably happier that it failed.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   91-115   116-120     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss