You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   90-114   115-120     
 
Author Message
6 new of 120 responses total.
gull
response 115 of 120: Mark Unseen   Dec 2 15:10 UTC 2003

Re #112: Yup.  The original justification for the double-nickel, energy
savings, was true.  My Civic gets 36-37 mpg at 70 mph.  On occasions
when I've taken long drives on two-lane highways with a 55 mph limit,
I've squeaked out 40 mpg.
jmsaul
response 116 of 120: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 03:14 UTC 2003

That's a very undramatic gain.
gull
response 117 of 120: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 16:00 UTC 2003

It's about 10%.  If gas prices suddenly went up 10% I bet you'd complain
at least a little about it. ;>

Also, the Civic hatchback is a fairly low-drag car.  Cd is 0.36, which
is decent but not exceptional, but the frontal area is only 1.9 square
meters.  A less aerodynamic car might see a bigger difference.
jp2
response 118 of 120: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 16:28 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 119 of 120: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 23:38 UTC 2003

That's pretty cool.  I doubt I'll ever buy another Honda, though.  The shape
of their seatbacks is incompatible with the shape of my back.
jmsaul
response 120 of 120: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 03:00 UTC 2003

Re #117:  No.  I don't track it that closely, but gas prices seem to
          fluctuate by 10% all the time.

          I'm not ragging on your car, by the way, just being unimpressed
          by the claimed benefits of the 55mph speed limit.  Good riddance.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   90-114   115-120     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss