|
Grex > Music2 > #112: Changes in the Music Business | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 189 responses total. |
tpryan
|
|
response 111 of 189:
| 
Dec 18 01:09 UTC 1999 |
When does MTV play videos these days?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 112 of 189:
|
Dec 18 03:11 UTC 1999 |
Alternate prime-numbered Sunday mornings between 4:30 and 4:35 AM.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 113 of 189:
|
Dec 18 15:53 UTC 1999 |
Both MTV and VH1 tend to play videos late at night now, making both stations
useful as an alternative to insomnia, but not good for much else.
|
goose
|
|
response 114 of 189:
|
Dec 20 05:02 UTC 1999 |
Any news on which store? Was it bootleg CD's or pirate CD's?
|
lumen
|
|
response 115 of 189:
|
Dec 23 20:51 UTC 1999 |
resp:110 I always figured they were the same company, originally. I
have no idea when MTV Networks passed into the hands of Viacom, but I do
remember it starting out as a Canadian company that also included
Nickelodeon. The Canadian markings were more apparent on Nickelodeon
during the early '80s: a majority of the programming was produced and
filmed in Canada.
I'm not sure whether or not competition would be a good thing. MTV
itself has explained that the market as it has existed didn't and
couldn't support the wall-to-wall music video programming that it
started with. I think this was the reason for the creation of M2
(which does show a lot more videos), but most people can only get it by
satellite.
Anyone remember The Box? The concept was pay-per-view based, except it
wasn't pay-per-view-- it was more pay-per-request. I don't remember it
lasting for very long.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 116 of 189:
|
Dec 23 22:22 UTC 1999 |
Viacom also owns Nickolodeon, I believe..
|
lumen
|
|
response 117 of 189:
|
Dec 24 00:31 UTC 1999 |
Of course it would. Nickelodeon is part of the old MTV Networks, as I
said, so I'm sure the company had no trouble acquiring it.
|
bmoran
|
|
response 118 of 189:
|
Dec 24 13:49 UTC 1999 |
In the late 80's (I think) USA network had a very late night weekend show
called Night Flight, that would show jazz videos, including Chuck
Mangione(?), the trumpet player, Miles Davis from the TUTU era, etc. I
haven't been plugged into cable for quite a while. Is there any sign of
these still available on tv? Or is it all just mainstream pop on mtv and
country on nashville?
|
bruin
|
|
response 119 of 189:
|
Dec 24 15:00 UTC 1999 |
What about VH-1 and BET, bmoran?
I do remember that NBC had a show in the 1980's called "Friday Night Videos."
and CBC in Canada (Windsor Channel 9) has "Video Hits" and "Good Rocking
Tonight."
|
bmoran
|
|
response 120 of 189:
|
Dec 30 13:15 UTC 1999 |
CBC also had 'Night Music' hosted by David Sanborn. Usually live music,
But when he had Miles on, he showed the studio recording of So What from
1959(?). I don't have cable, so VH-1 and BET are unknown to me.
|
lumen
|
|
response 121 of 189:
|
Jan 11 03:12 UTC 2000 |
VH-1 is more geared to adult contemporary, which has been running
heavily into general pop lately. No, they don't do jazz vids, and I
doubt serious players buy into that thing anyway. BET generally shows
stuff that feels more like being at a nightclub than watching some
overproduced video.
|
bmoran
|
|
response 122 of 189:
|
Jan 11 21:09 UTC 2000 |
The ones I saw were'nt 'overproduced', just classy. When Miles did TUTU,
it was just Miles, holding his hands in trumpet position, black and white
film stock, and little colored musical notes coming out of his fingers.
There were others I can't remember, but I mostly remember the overall
quality being much better than what was on MTV, until Michael showed up.
|
lumen
|
|
response 123 of 189:
|
Jan 12 01:25 UTC 2000 |
Michael Jackson?
|
bmoran
|
|
response 124 of 189:
|
Jan 12 13:29 UTC 2000 |
Yes! Some of the videos were ok, but Michael raised the bar, opening up
the whole scene for some very creatice people to 'try anything', with
admittedly mixed results.
|
lumen
|
|
response 125 of 189:
|
Jan 12 17:55 UTC 2000 |
Right-- I did find it interesting that MTV chose "Thriller" as the #1
greatest video of all time. The director had worked on the film _An
American Werewolf in London_, and he was chosen because of his
reputation stemming from that film.
I don't think horror had been used in a music video before.
I also thought it was fantastic that Michael worked with a
choreographer-- the documentary said he was quite a natural who had
acheived a lot of talent relatively quickly, compared to the other
extras who were skilled and highly trained dance professionals.
I think the video looked a little bit more like a film. I'm assuming
it was shot on 35mm, and a lot of the storyline constructs were more
like that of a film. That may have been the difference. Of course,
the budget was comparable, too.
A pretty impressive feat. Most precursors to video *were* films,
especially in the '50s and '60s (Elvis and Beatles movies, for
example), but Michael appears to have taken the genre and integrated
the song more fully into such a video. I still enjoy watching it-- the
craftmanship is fantastic.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 126 of 189:
|
Jan 12 18:21 UTC 2000 |
It also helped that Michael Jackson had something visually interesting to do:
he could _dance._ That right there made his videos worth watching in a way
that most other bands' videos aren't.
|
krj
|
|
response 127 of 189:
|
Jan 17 18:32 UTC 2000 |
Radio news report: The BMG conglomerate, one of the Big Five music
companies, is seeking to make itself even bigger; it wants to buy
either Sony Music, or EMI.
This would take us down to four major music companies.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 128 of 189:
|
Jan 17 18:42 UTC 2000 |
<sigh>
|
goose
|
|
response 129 of 189:
|
Jan 18 16:46 UTC 2000 |
good lord...will it ever stop?
|
krj
|
|
response 130 of 189:
|
Jan 18 18:36 UTC 2000 |
"There can be only one!" :)
I haven't been able to find a web confirmation on the BMG buying binge
story.
|
dbratman
|
|
response 131 of 189:
|
Jan 19 23:16 UTC 2000 |
Silver lining: the fewer big corporations, the more niche markets open
for small companies.
|
krj
|
|
response 132 of 189:
|
Jan 23 05:02 UTC 2000 |
CNN: "Time Warner Inc. of the United States is set to take a majority
stake in Britain's EMI Group Plc in a multibillion-dollar deal to
create the world's largest record company, the Sunday Telegraph
newspaper said."
The CNN story mentions the previous rumors that BMG was looking to
buy EMI.
Time Warner, as you are probably tired of hearing, is also merging
with AOL.
|
krj
|
|
response 133 of 189:
|
Jan 23 20:24 UTC 2000 |
The merger story is everywhere today. The Washington Post says the
merged Warner EMI Music would be only the second largest record
company.
The Post says further: speculation is now circulating that BMG
will be in play. BMG is the largest media company in Europe, but
it would be the smallest of the remaining record companies, I think.
The Post says BMG doesn't have the stock values or assets to acquire
another record company to try to become too big to swallow.
|
krj
|
|
response 134 of 189:
|
Jan 26 06:24 UTC 2000 |
A number of analysts argue that this is a merger of fading giants.
I remember when Warner/Elektra/Atlantic was the coolest of the major
labels, renowned for being artist-friendly, but that was
back in the 1970s and 1980s. In the 1990s
the label has been ripped by corporate infighting and their market
share has sunk badly. And as for EMI, well, their peak was with
the Beatles.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 135 of 189:
|
Jan 26 10:47 UTC 2000 |
So who are the remaining competitors at that level?
|