You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   85-109   110-134   135-138    
 
Author Message
25 new of 138 responses total.
jmsaul
response 110 of 138: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 23:08 UTC 2004

Good point.
bhelliom
response 111 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 17:47 UTC 2004

Oh will the lot of you quit whining over what precendence has been set 
and decide what you want to happen.  Let sleeping dogs lie already and 
decide based upon this experience what you want to happen in the future 
instead of hurling insults.
tod
response 112 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 18:55 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

happyboy
response 113 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 20:06 UTC 2004

re111:  yeah, just go to sleep and let the VANDALS run things.

"let sleeping dogs lie"  whatever, patsy.
tod
response 114 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 20:27 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

anderyn
response 115 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 21:41 UTC 2004

So if we sent you and cyklone your files, you would be happy? (I am not sure
how many other people don't care or don't want their entries in those items
restored, I know that I didn't wish it.)
jp2
response 116 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 21:45 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

tod
response 117 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 22:12 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

cyklone
response 118 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 23:57 UTC 2004

I think restoration is appropriate if grex is to truly support free and
uncensored speech. However, I believe the vote shows that personal favors for
favored persons has a higher priority here.

As a matter of user control over their own words, even if there is no
restoration I believe I am entitled to have my files. Those words were
posted under the name dbunker, which someone else seems to have grabbed. 
Nevertheless, I believe there are ways I can convince staff I am indeed
the real dbunker. 

cmcgee
response 119 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 00:13 UTC 2004

Give it a rest.  I would not support -anyone- viewing those files again,
ever.
jp2
response 120 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 01:36 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rational
response 121 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 01:51 UTC 2004

Or a Jew.
jp2
response 122 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 02:16 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 123 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 02:40 UTC 2004

plz post a list
jp2
response 124 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 03:34 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

cyklone
response 125 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 03:45 UTC 2004

Re #119: So I shouldn't be able to view *MY OWN* words? How delightfully
unprincipled of you!
tod
response 126 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 23:00 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jmsaul
response 127 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 00:59 UTC 2004

Re #119:  That's a very strong position.  Why?  Annoyance at Jamie?
cmcgee
response 128 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 15:18 UTC 2004

I'm frustrated.  It appears to me that we have extremestes who can onlly be
dealt with by extreme positions (extremists).
jp2
response 129 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 18:49 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

salad
response 130 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 22:40 UTC 2004

Yeah, taking matters upon your own hands to create new rules and set precedent
is definitely not "extreme".
cyklone
response 131 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 25 00:17 UTC 2004

Re #128: Saying no one should ever have access to the deleted text, not even
their own words, sounds about as extreme as you can get.
jmsaul
response 132 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 25 03:08 UTC 2004

Re #128:  From my point of view, there are extremists on both sides.
jaklumen
response 133 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 25 04:10 UTC 2004

I could agree with that.
tod
response 134 of 138: Mark Unseen   Feb 25 22:10 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   85-109   110-134   135-138    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss