|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 133 responses total. |
mcnally
|
|
response 108 of 133:
| 
Feb 23 17:44 UTC 2006 |
I'm still hoping for Alec Baldwin to make good on previous pledges..
|
happyboy
|
|
response 109 of 133:
|
Feb 23 17:52 UTC 2006 |
re107: yes. i will not raise my daughter in
a country where her reproductive rights
are dictated by a bunch of socially retarded
characters straight out of "A Handmaid's Tale."
if anyone really thinks that these dominionist
types are gonna stop at abortions they are mistaken.
shit they are opposed to the hpv vaccine fer
christsakes.
not sure where we'd go but i'm gonna update my teaching
certification just in case. tod, ever heard or world service
authority for passports?
|
nharmon
|
|
response 110 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:01 UTC 2006 |
I hear Japan and Korea pay well for native English speakers with
teaching ability.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 111 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:11 UTC 2006 |
yeah, but i'll bet they keep their disabled kids in
the garage...and i don't want to teach in the garage
dig?
|
nharmon
|
|
response 112 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:16 UTC 2006 |
Hey Holm, I can dig it! So knock yourself a pro slick. Gray matter back
got perform' us' down I take TCBin, man'.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 113 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:25 UTC 2006 |
that was pretty white.
|
tod
|
|
response 114 of 133:
|
Feb 23 18:34 UTC 2006 |
re #101
I think they will. They'll do it with bells on, even.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 115 of 133:
|
Feb 23 19:10 UTC 2006 |
resp:107 Once my husband has his nursing license- yup.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 116 of 133:
|
Feb 23 19:11 UTC 2006 |
he's going to breastfeed?
|
jadecat
|
|
response 117 of 133:
|
Feb 23 19:35 UTC 2006 |
Well, we've talked about it, and breast feeding is supposed to be better
for the baby so... ;)
|
happyboy
|
|
response 118 of 133:
|
Feb 23 19:46 UTC 2006 |
well have him trim those areolas, or the baby might gag.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 119 of 133:
|
Feb 23 20:21 UTC 2006 |
Oh yeah... good point. Although baby animals manage.
|
naftee
|
|
response 120 of 133:
|
Feb 23 21:52 UTC 2006 |
re 113
this is why nate should never freestyle :(
|
nharmon
|
|
response 121 of 133:
|
Feb 23 22:39 UTC 2006 |
Freestyle?
|
happyboy
|
|
response 122 of 133:
|
Feb 23 23:05 UTC 2006 |
nate is into freestyle hairynipple breastfeeding?!
|
eprom
|
|
response 123 of 133:
|
Feb 24 00:53 UTC 2006 |
re #109
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 124 of 133:
|
Feb 24 01:19 UTC 2006 |
i won't, fagola!
|
other
|
|
response 125 of 133:
|
Feb 24 02:52 UTC 2006 |
If abortion becomes illegal I intend to flagrantly violate the law and
have an abortion at every opportunity!
|
scholar
|
|
response 126 of 133:
|
Feb 24 04:42 UTC 2006 |
AHAHAHA START WITH YOURSELF
FOETUS
|
gull
|
|
response 127 of 133:
|
Feb 24 07:08 UTC 2006 |
Re resp:107: If I move out, it won't be for that reason.
Actually, I think Roe v. Wade being overturned would be a political
disaster for conservatives, because it would eliminate the abortion
issue as a way to rally their base. It would also show that even if
you're not gay or black, your personal freedoms can still suffer if you
vote for conservatives.
|
klg
|
|
response 128 of 133:
|
Feb 24 11:50 UTC 2006 |
Eric the Flush: You are probably too old to be aborted.
|
richard
|
|
response 129 of 133:
|
Feb 24 22:18 UTC 2006 |
re #127 there's a school of thought that if roe was overturned, and abortion
was subject to the laws of individual states, that you'd have a huge mess
You'd have abortion illegal in Indiana and legal in Illinois, and the courts
would be overflowing if they tried to enforce "going over state lines for
purposes of getting an abortion" laws. It would just never work on a state
by state basis, just as prohibition couldn't work that way. So Congress would
have to pass federal laws outlawing abortion nationally, which they wouldn't
do because they all have to get re-elected, and its hard to get elected
without the womens vote.
without a federal ban, eventually even conservative states won't want to raise
taxes to pay the massive court costs that would be involved in state abortion
bans.
|
keesan
|
|
response 130 of 133:
|
Feb 24 23:10 UTC 2006 |
It was until recently illegal for even raped teens in Ireland to go somewhere
else for a legal abortion. Spain was ahead of Ireland.
|
richard
|
|
response 131 of 133:
|
Feb 25 02:17 UTC 2006 |
The thing is a state can't make it illegal for someone to cross state
lines into another state, for any reason. There were such laws long
ago, such as a law in some states that made it illegal for a man to
take a woman who was not his wife across state lines, even if she was
legal age. These laws were declared unconstitutional. An adult
citizen of the United States cannot be prevented by any state from
traveling to any other part of this country, unless he/she has been
charged with a crime. And it is not a crime for an adult to be
pregnant. An abortion could only be classified as a crime, if it were
illegal, after it happens.
|
twenex
|
|
response 132 of 133:
|
Feb 25 18:33 UTC 2006 |
Re: #130. The Catholic Church lost a lot of support in Spain over its support
of the dictator, Franco.
|