| Grex > Agora46 > #17: affirmative action - UM - supreme court (wha-hoppin?!) |
| response 107 of 113: | 
Jul 10 16:07 UTC 2003 |
As well as a negative tax on one's own existence??
| response 108 of 113: |
Jul 16 08:11 UTC 2003 |
quality conytributions - gotta love it - until the affirmative action discussin got derailed into , what, irs? start a new item. this is affirmative action. i am glad to hear that some non-recipients have chaffed at the suggestion/presumption that they were recipients = and happier still that they graduated inthe tip of their class. such preformance does more for eliminating racism than any other action.
| response 109 of 113: |
Jul 17 06:26 UTC 2003 |
and .. i am glad that *my* soulution - individualized scrutiny - has been affirmed by the supreme court. no other solution was rational.
| response 110 of 113: |
Jul 17 18:49 UTC 2003 |
Hopefully that will mean the end of undergraduate racism at UofM, since they can't apply individual scrutiny to the tens of thousands of applicants they get every year.
| response 111 of 113: |
Jul 23 13:16 UTC 2003 |
*snorts* As if that totally takes care of the problem. "Undergraduate racism" my ass.
| response 112 of 113: |
Jul 23 14:02 UTC 2003 |
heard an amusing commercial for Comedy Central's new show this morning: "There *is* a lot of racial tension on the force. It's all because of Andy Garcia. He can't help it, poor guy--he's a Mexican." :)
| response 113 of 113: |
Jul 23 17:09 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.