| You are not logged in. Login Now | register | search | |||||||||
|
| |||
| Author | Message | ||
| 11 new of 116 responses total. | |||
|
jp2 |
This response has been erased.
| ||
|
remmers |
I would NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT like to see Grex as an organization start taking sides in partisan politics. It's a free speech forum. I think 501(c)3 is right for us. | ||
|
gull |
I agree. I apologize if my comment made anyone think otherwise. | ||
|
dpc |
Me, too. | ||
|
janc |
501c3 does, in fact, allow some space for doing limited political things. When I wrote our 501c3 application I was very careful to NOT say that we would never do anything political, but rather to say that the kinds of political things we would do would fit within the 501c3 rules. I really didn't want people arguing that Grex has to be scrubbed clean of politics based on our 501c3 application. | ||
|
tsty |
patriot II has sent its tentacles to this disturbing location: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54512-2004Mar12.html The Justice Department wants to significantly expand the government's ability to monitor online traffic, proposing that providers of high-speed Internet service should be forced to grant easier access for FBI wiretaps and other electronic surveillance, according to documents and government officials. idon't like this at all, at all. | ||
|
twenex |
Grrr. | ||
|
salad |
ARRR. | ||
|
styles |
not even a little bit, a little bit? | ||
|
tsty |
not even a little bit. | ||
|
jesuit |
TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE | ||
|
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In |
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss