You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   79-103   104-128   129-153   154-178   179-203 
 204-228   229-253   254-278   279-303   304-328   329-332     
 
Author Message
25 new of 332 responses total.
tod
response 104 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 3 15:40 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mynxcat
response 105 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 3 20:21 UTC 2003

No thanks.

157 this morning. Pretty encouraging, even though it may be a 
fluctuation. Will weigh myself at the same scale I used a week ago at 
the gym.
jaklumen
response 106 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 00:24 UTC 2003

gripes... weigh yourself weekly if that's what it takes to forget the 
day-to-day variations that don't matter so much.  (Just a thought)
mynxcat
response 107 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 01:11 UTC 2003

Heh :)

Work out was good. On the cross trainer it seems that the more the resistance
is and the slower the speed, the more calories that are burned. It made more
sun to go at it slowly with a high resistance and then speed up when the
desired heart rate was reached.

Also found an aerobic achine that works on the hands instead of the legs. And
excellent way to give my legs a break while still keeping the heart rate up.

Finally sampled my 5 grain low-fat bread. I really liked it. Had it with a
tuna burger. Very satisfying with ome lemon juice on it. Also had some miso
soup, and a slice of the honey cake.
scg
response 108 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 02:24 UTC 2003

Although, if you weigh yourself weekly, you get a random sample of day to day
variations.
jaklumen
response 109 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 03:27 UTC 2003

It's a trade-off.  I can weigh daily and not get too bothered by the 
numbers all that often.  The point is to do what works, i.e. what will 
keep you motivated.
oval
response 110 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 23:28 UTC 2003

i didn;t read all of this .. 109 damn posts and i'm way behind. but 22 lbs
ain;'t much to lode if you cut out shitty food and get some excercise evryday.

sheesh.

remmers
response 111 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 14:51 UTC 2003

Ease of losing weight is age-dependent.  The older you are, the
harder it gets.
keesan
response 112 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 16:57 UTC 2003

Only to a certain age, then people lose weight again.
mary
response 113 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 21:30 UTC 2003

Right, at some point your taste buds stop working and your
teeth get loose and painful and you're so tired of living
you don't even want to get dressed in the morning, nevertheless
go out to eat.  So you lose weight.

Wow, good news! ;-)
mynxcat
response 114 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 21:43 UTC 2003

No fat cottage cheese has an icky metallic taste. Not a good idea. Slim Fast's
Hot Meal is passable. Found somehing to substitue for butter with half the
calories and half the fat.

In all it's randomness, the scale has not registered anything higher than
158.5 in the last 3 days. Today it registered 156. I'm finally breaking
through.

Bought myself an mp3 player (long overdue) to help with the pace-motivation
for my workouts.
gelinas
response 115 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 22:19 UTC 2003

(Last I looked, all the calories in butter and its substitutes came from fat.
The fat may be corn oil, or even canola oil, but it's still fat.)
keesan
response 116 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 23:41 UTC 2003

Butter substitutes tend to substitute water or air for the fat and charge you
for them.
gelinas
response 117 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 00:18 UTC 2003

But nonetheless, all of their calories still come from fat.  Water, air and
fat are just about all that is in margerine.
i
response 118 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 01:14 UTC 2003

If you use 50% more (by volume) of a spread that's 50% air & water (by
volume), then you've applied 25% fewer calories to you waistline (vs.
your old 100%-pure-fat spread).
gelinas
response 119 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 01:34 UTC 2003

(The point is not calories; the point is fat intake.  Sure, you are getting
fewer calories, and less fat, using margerine instead of butter, but the
calories are _still_ 100% fat.  Don't believe me?  Read the label.)
mynxcat
response 120 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 16:31 UTC 2003

It's true, most of the calories are still fat. But there's still only 
4.5 gms fat / tablespoon of this new stuff (I don't remember the name) 
as compared to 10gms in the "Can't Believe It's Not Butter" stuff. I 
haven't had a chance to try it yet, so I don't know what it tastes 
like. I'm a huge butter/butter-like-substance fan. I need something on 
my bread. We'll see how this works.

Had a huge dinner last night. We were invited over to dinner at former 
boss's place. Dinner was delicious though there was "ghee" (Indian 
clarified butter, sometimes substituted for oil in dishes, and more 
fatty and cholestrol-laden than oil) in most of the dishes. The scale 
registered 158 this morning. I'm glad it still hasn't registered 159 
and it's been about 4 or 5 days. I can safely say that I'm definitely 
under 159 lbs now?
gelinas
response 121 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 18:33 UTC 2003

(I substituted honey and fruit preserves for butter on my bread.  Salt and
pepper, no butter or substitute, on potatoes and corn.  Salt and pepper on
salads.  Salsa in tuna, instead of mayo.  I really needed to eliminate fat
from diet.   Still do.)
mynxcat
response 122 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 19:07 UTC 2003

I don't like sweet stuff on my bread. So no honey or fruit preserves. 
We cook potatoes the Indian way. I like to have corn without any 
condimenmts. 

I usually don't have anything with my tuna. Sometimes some Miracle-
Whip, though I haven't had that in a year now. 

I've looked at what I usually eat, and think that most of my problems 
were huge quantities and an intake of fat that I would definitely not 
miss. And a serious lack of exercise
slynne
response 123 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 19:36 UTC 2003

Oh man. I hate mayo. I will have to try that salsa with tuna thing. 
jaklumen
response 124 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 03:22 UTC 2003

Miracle-Whip isn't exactly mayo.
mynxcat
response 125 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 05:17 UTC 2003

But it's a good enough substitute.

My exercise routine was interrupted by a page and spending an hour in the
locker room on the phone trying to conduct a conference to solve problem.
Luckily the call ended before my phone died, or I would have had t o return
home. I was able to resume workout after the hour, but it did mean that I got
home at 10:00 pm. today also showed me about how fanatical I've become about
my work-ou, once I've got to the gym,. Getting to the gym is a whole different
story. Also, working out to Bad Boy Bill is highly motivating, pace wise. 

Dinner was salmon steak and Orange Juice. Today my carbohydrate intake was
only 43%. Which i'm not complaining about.I guess the fish contributed to the
low carbs and the high protein.
tod
response 126 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 15:33 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mynxcat
response 127 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 17:46 UTC 2003

Salmon isn't too expensive. At least I can afford it from the local 
Meijer
happyboy
response 128 of 332: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 18:41 UTC 2003

re126: except for the MERCURY.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   79-103   104-128   129-153   154-178   179-203 
 204-228   229-253   254-278   279-303   304-328   329-332     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss