|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 128 responses total. |
tom67
|
|
response 100 of 128:
| 
Nov 17 20:05 UTC 1994 |
Blankie? Thumb? Teddy!! (where did I put you...?)
|
brighn
|
|
response 101 of 128:
|
Nov 18 03:05 UTC 1994 |
I still have one of my bankies. And an original teddy from when I was a
wee lad. I seem to have misplaced my thumb, though.... anyone seen it?
|
eeyore
|
|
response 102 of 128:
|
Nov 18 16:10 UTC 1994 |
i think that you left it my house. i'll find it an d get it back to you.
|
dang
|
|
response 103 of 128:
|
Nov 18 16:22 UTC 1994 |
plib.
|
anne
|
|
response 104 of 128:
|
Nov 18 22:36 UTC 1994 |
Nope, haven't seen your thumb...
My mom got to the point where she was afraid to wash my blankie... it was
made for me by an aunt, and was a little quilt. Well, it got so tattered
that my mom thought it would disentegrate if she washed it!!
|
alfee
|
|
response 105 of 128:
|
Nov 19 20:24 UTC 1994 |
I had a blanky, and I still have a stuffed doggie and pillow. I was
lucky enough to have braces so that no one would have to guess at my
close, early association with the aforementioned objects.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 106 of 128:
|
Nov 25 05:43 UTC 1994 |
zhmm. . . .everytime I would get to this item, something would grab
my attention, I would have to jet.. But now I can add my two cents.
I could not see having a net relationship with anybody beyond being friends.
Hmm . . . .I think htat was said. Oh well.
|
gerund
|
|
response 107 of 128:
|
Nov 25 17:16 UTC 1994 |
It wouldn't exactly be a NET relationship any more if it was beyond being
friends, would it? How can two people HONESTLY be anything more than
friends if they only know each other through the net? Does the idea even
really make sense?
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 108 of 128:
|
Nov 26 21:57 UTC 1994 |
Of course it doesn't. Perhaps it's the wording.
But, then again, you'd be surprised to know there are some
poeple in existence who believe it could work!
|
canis
|
|
response 109 of 128:
|
Nov 27 01:40 UTC 1994 |
I'm sure that there are some people who think that dogs could fly if
they wiggled there ears fast enough too.....
|
anne
|
|
response 110 of 128:
|
Nov 28 00:37 UTC 1994 |
not necessarily canis...
|
canis
|
|
response 111 of 128:
|
Nov 29 03:12 UTC 1994 |
Why not I think they could, hey if a dwarf elephant could why could a dog?
|
moon
|
|
response 112 of 128:
|
Dec 12 22:23 UTC 1994 |
I don't know, why could a dog?
|
fraizer
|
|
response 113 of 128:
|
Dec 12 22:40 UTC 1994 |
How much could could a dog could could if a dog could could dog could?
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 114 of 128:
|
Dec 15 05:25 UTC 1994 |
<Ysaane shudders violently>
|
fraizer
|
|
response 115 of 128:
|
Dec 15 17:37 UTC 1994 |
Sorry. I didn't know you were alergic.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 116 of 128:
|
Dec 15 22:56 UTC 1994 |
I'm not allergic to dogs. Just to bad adaptations to previously bad
tongue twisters.
<Ysaane grins>
|
fraizer
|
|
response 117 of 128:
|
Dec 16 20:55 UTC 1994 |
Yet you must admit, I am the first person ever to put those
particular words together...
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 118 of 128:
|
Dec 16 23:12 UTC 1994 |
Well. . . .?
|
flem
|
|
response 119 of 128:
|
Dec 17 00:51 UTC 1994 |
sigh.
|
fraizer
|
|
response 120 of 128:
|
Dec 17 03:39 UTC 1994 |
C'mon. Just gimme this one. It may not seem like much to you,
but it's all I have!
|
sun
|
|
response 121 of 128:
|
Dec 17 05:36 UTC 1994 |
Awww....umm.....let us think about it...
NO!
|
fraizer
|
|
response 122 of 128:
|
Dec 19 18:51 UTC 1994 |
That's OK. I expected as much from YOU. But I'm strong, I can get past this.
|
sun
|
|
response 123 of 128:
|
Dec 20 08:40 UTC 1994 |
ME???? WHAT ABOUT ME?? HUN??? WANNA MAKE SOMETHING OF IT????HUN?????
|
fraizer
|
|
response 124 of 128:
|
Dec 20 20:17 UTC 1994 |
"Can't we all just get along?!"
-the great and wordy Rodney King
|
