You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-162    
 
Author Message
25 new of 162 responses total.
jazz
response 100 of 162: Mark Unseen   Aug 27 15:18 UTC 1999

        I should say large ISPs do not want to provide peering to their smaller
neighbors, not to their neighbors at all.
macho
response 101 of 162: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 12:42 UTC 1999

hi !!my name is anand.anybody wanna be my friend?
headdoc
response 102 of 162: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 23:15 UTC 1999

I was just in the middle of a long e-mail when all sorts of letter strings
appeared on my screen and my cursor froze.  Nothing I did could get things
going again and I lost the whole darn correspondence.  What causes that and
can it be rectified?
other
response 103 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 00:07 UTC 1999

did someone pick up an extension phone on your modem line?
mcnally
response 104 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 01:45 UTC 1999

  re #102:   were you dialled in directly or telnetting in?  it should
  *never* happen if you're telnetting in..
scg
response 105 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 02:17 UTC 1999

Unless you're dialed into wherever you're telnetting from with a terminal..
mcnally
response 106 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 04:20 UTC 1999

  Unless you're dialed in using PPP or some other TCP-over-dialup protocol,
  etc..  I was hoping not to open that can of worms by assuming that if she
  was telnetted in that there was no non-error-correcting link in the chain..
headdoc
response 107 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 21:58 UTC 1999

I dialed in from home.  Also, we have a separate line for the computer, so
no, no one picked up the telephone extension.  Any other ideas?  Could it be
a break of some kind in the telephone line outside the house?  Could it have
been something originating at the Grex terminal?  Could it have been something
in the Pine works?  I was e-mailing through pine.
Inquiring minds want to know.\
mooncat
response 108 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 3 23:31 UTC 1999

Hmm, I wonder if it could have been cross-talk somewhere along the line.
Every once and awhile while working in one office on campus we would
get calls for a completely different office with a totally different
number- but because of interference on the line we got their calls.
So somewhere, if wire were slightly frayed and hit each other just
right you could have gotten some 'noise' through your line.

rcurl
response 109 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 4 02:13 UTC 1999

You could have a poor connection in a modular plug; the telephone company
might have done something; an animal might have nibbled an elevated phone
wire; lightning?; wind could have rattled a bad external connection;
something might have happened at Grex (among which are all of the above
plus staff falling off their chairs....   :)
headdoc
response 110 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 02:11 UTC 1999

If I had to guess, it would be the cross talk or frayed lines.  No wind or
lightening at the time, Rane.  A day like today.  Now Grex staff members
falling off chairs. . .I am trying to envision.  Everyone seems so stable.
(a psychologists pun.)
tpryan
response 111 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 02:39 UTC 1999

        Just had a phunny phone connect.  Ring thru on the first line,
then after second line answered, a disconnect.  A quick re-dial got
me in.
otaking
response 112 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 11:13 UTC 1999

Yesterday, grex said that I had a bad participation file when I entered aora.
Now it says that I have 190 brandnew items. It's as if I never read anything
in this conference at all. Is there any way to fix that?
remmers
response 113 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 11:59 UTC 1999

Yes - type "fixseen" at the "Ok:" prompt (if you're using Picospan and
not Backtalk).  Then, to read responses new in the last day, type
"read since -1".

This problem occurs whenever Picospan tries to update your conference
participation file at a time when the disk is full. The /a disk filled
up yesterday afternoon. My participation file got zapped too.
otaking
response 114 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 18:19 UTC 1999

Thanks remmers, that seems to have fixed the problem.
drew
response 115 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 19:51 UTC 1999

/a is full again.
don
response 116 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 8 21:02 UTC 1999

Hmm.... owing to the full drive, would it be worth it to back up my
participation file (say, every time I log in or something)? Are they the .cf
files?
other
response 117 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 9 02:36 UTC 1999

yes, but only if you back them up off grex.  otherwise, you are just
contributing to the problem...
dpc
response 118 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 9 14:57 UTC 1999

I dialed in on -3000 a few minutes ago and was peaceably reading
my mail when I was disconnected.  When I logged in again, here is
what the System said:

Last login: Thu Sep  9 10:46:06 on ttyqd from 204.212.46.132      

I have been *repeatedly* disconnected for the past several weeks.
This is very disconcerting.  Does anyone have any idea why
this is happening?  Are others having this problem?
dpc
response 119 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 9 15:15 UTC 1999

I was just disconnected *again*!  When I re-connected, I was told:

Last login: Thu Sep  9 10:55:01 on ttyu7 from 204.212.46.132  

Do we have a bad modem/set of modems?
scott
response 120 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 9 15:40 UTC 1999

I haven't had any problems in a while.  Have you tried from a different
location (ie not your own phone line)?
jazz
response 121 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 9 17:18 UTC 1999

        Not strictly a system problem, but an amusing error message during the
daily queue:

...3
Sep  9 13:11 Sep  9 13:11 56880 -1 11229 203.197.98.6 LOST HEAD
...2
...1

        [203.197.98.6 is a part of VSNL's broken-DNS space]
tpryan
response 122 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 9 21:39 UTC 1999

re120:          Are you sure it isn't the 9/9/99 bug?
russ
response 123 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 10 00:12 UTC 1999

One of the modems at or below -3554 in the trunk hunt is ringing open.
goose
response 124 of 162: Mark Unseen   Sep 10 04:11 UTC 1999

does this look okay?:
16 waiting, 64 remote + 3 local users; 72 max remote users; 4951 head
...2 of 17; 67 users
...2 of 17; 66 users   
...2 of 16; 65 users  

IT's not that I had to wait a long time to get onto Grex, but I read it
as eight less people should be waiting to get on (72 max remote - 64 remote)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-162    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss