|
Grex > Helpers > #149: Grex System Problems - Spring 2006 | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 333 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 100 of 333:
| 
May 1 16:40 UTC 2006 |
My doc has a wand he waves over my forehead to measure my temp.
|
tsty
|
|
response 101 of 333:
|
May 3 05:57 UTC 2006 |
usualy, the liver temp determines time of death ...
|
tod
|
|
response 102 of 333:
|
May 3 17:35 UTC 2006 |
What if you have advanced Hep C and are drinking icey cold margeritas?
|
happyboy
|
|
response 103 of 333:
|
May 3 17:36 UTC 2006 |
mmmmmm!
|
tsty
|
|
response 104 of 333:
|
May 4 13:48 UTC 2006 |
re 102 .. same result
re #93 .... teh edited email should have kept the same index
number/mesage number .. but it doesnt.
system problem!
|
ball
|
|
response 105 of 333:
|
May 6 00:31 UTC 2006 |
Re #99: I hope that the results of the check-up
were favorable!
|
davel
|
|
response 106 of 333:
|
May 10 17:31 UTC 2006 |
Trying to ssh in, after I enter my username & password, I get:
> Server refused to allocate pty
This has been happening pretty persistently.
|
eprom
|
|
response 107 of 333:
|
May 10 17:46 UTC 2006 |
Seems like if the number of ttys can't (won't?) be increased the idle
killer should be set to something reasonable...maybe 6 hours?
1:44PM up 19 days, 20:17, 63 users, load averages: 0.55, 0.97, 1.12
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT
is p8 212.154.163.22 Sun01PM 2days lynx
is pf 212.154.163.22 Sun08AM 3days lynx
is pk 212.154.163.22 Mon04AM 2days lynx
is px 212.154.163.22 Sun12PM 3days lynx
is pF 212.154.163.22 7:05AM 6:38 lynx
|
cross
|
|
response 108 of 333:
|
May 10 22:10 UTC 2006 |
This response has been erased.
|
keesan
|
|
response 109 of 333:
|
May 10 23:58 UTC 2006 |
I have not been able to ftp from my computer to grex with kermit/ftp or wget.
After a very long delay, I could ftp to freeshell (the second two files went
right away). Maybe I should have waited 1-2 minutes to ftp directly.
Nor did a mail I tried to forward to freeshell (because it had filled my
mailbox with about 800K) get there in 5 minutes.
|
cross
|
|
response 110 of 333:
|
May 11 01:37 UTC 2006 |
This response has been erased.
|
pfv
|
|
response 111 of 333:
|
May 11 11:44 UTC 2006 |
Why is the the system not sweeping these (apparently) dead connections?
I mean... 2 & 3 days "idle"? Sounds dead to me.
|
cross
|
|
response 112 of 333:
|
May 11 12:22 UTC 2006 |
This response has been erased.
|
eprom
|
|
response 113 of 333:
|
May 11 21:02 UTC 2006 |
is there any reason why an regular user needs any more than two telnet
connections going at a time?
|
cross
|
|
response 114 of 333:
|
May 11 22:51 UTC 2006 |
This response has been erased.
|
twenex
|
|
response 115 of 333:
|
May 11 22:52 UTC 2006 |
amen.
|
eprom
|
|
response 116 of 333:
|
May 11 22:56 UTC 2006 |
yes, when there is a limited number of pty's
|
cross
|
|
response 117 of 333:
|
May 11 23:29 UTC 2006 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 118 of 333:
|
May 12 01:08 UTC 2006 |
Re #s 113 & 114: I sometimes read a response in one window and write my
response in another when they are separated by some distance.
|
keesan
|
|
response 119 of 333:
|
May 12 02:41 UTC 2006 |
Is there an item in which we are supposed to ask for programs to be added to
grex? I would like antiword (to convert doc files to text so we can read them
here) and an rtf convertor such as rtf2html and pdftotext. People keep
sending me stupid formats of email. I got one yesterday with text, html, rtf,
doc, and pdf in it. I ftp'ed the files to freeshell to use their programs
(but could not find pdftotext there).
|
nharmon
|
|
response 120 of 333:
|
May 12 02:44 UTC 2006 |
You can use the screen program to do multiple things in one telnet
session. But I agree with Dan, increase the number of ptys.
|
malymi
|
|
response 121 of 333:
|
May 12 10:41 UTC 2006 |
screen isn't magical, it requires a pty for every :screen you create.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 122 of 333:
|
May 12 16:46 UTC 2006 |
It's true that it requires ptys but I still think screen is magical.
|
marcvh
|
|
response 123 of 333:
|
May 12 17:04 UTC 2006 |
Screen was magical back in the days of dial-in before PPP or even SLIP,
although it still did not measure of up to "uw", a superior windowing
program. The chief advantage of uw was that switching between screens
didn't require re-sending the entire contents of the new screen, which
was a big deal when you only had a 2400 baud modem.
|
tod
|
|
response 124 of 333:
|
May 12 18:10 UTC 2006 |
re #122
It's true that it requires ptys but I still think screen is magical.
I find the "-h 9000" option magical for scrolling back and cut&paste.
|