You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 
Author Message
25 new of 224 responses total.
cross
response 100 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 17 21:15 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 101 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 17 22:04 UTC 2003

CAEN (at UM) does not require that one change one's password. If asked,
they will recommend it, but the system does not create an automatic
recommender.
tod
response 102 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 00:26 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jazz
response 103 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 01:50 UTC 2003

        I'd like to suggest that each new user type up a few pages of
completely random characters, and send them to GREX staff, which would then
use the first eight for the password, then erase them, and work with the next
eight upon the next login.
rcurl
response 104 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 01:52 UTC 2003

What's a "completely random character"? Well, OK: here is my completely
random "5". 
cross
response 105 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 01:53 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jazz
response 106 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 01:58 UTC 2003

        
        Biometrics now!
cross
response 107 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 02:07 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

jep
response 108 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 03:17 UTC 2003

Dan, nothing you've said has supported doing away with passwords 
entirely, unless I've missed something.  I think that's going too far.
cross
response 109 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 03:57 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

orinoco
response 110 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 04:29 UTC 2003

Good.  Plenty of ultimately futile things are worth doing, and authentication
is one of them. :)
pvn
response 111 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 08:26 UTC 2003

Other than for the purpose of deleting users who are no longer around
the password expire thingy is probably a little silly.  Back in the old
days when there was a password file that any user could read and see the
crypted password there was a big debate about this being a security
problem.  Crack put the end to that and since then the actual crypted
password is not world readable - shadowed.  Thus dictionary attacks are
not useful unless one has already cracked root and stolen the shadowed
password file.  And if one already had root then why fuck around with
mere user passwords.  The problem of sniffing plaintext transmission of
passwords still remains but that is easily addressed by using ssh/htttps
if you are really concerned about it.  These days requirement of
frequent password changes and that they be non-dictionary words results
in less security as others noted prior in that the cleaning crew at the
office know everybodys passwords should they have the skillset to do
something with them. (If I steal your laptop chances are very good that
there is at least a file if not pieces of diskette lable with passwords
in plaintext.)  (Personally, I keep a PDA with a passworded application
that has otherwise crypted all my passwords but that is just me.)  (I
used to use Uzbek swear words but that went away in the early '90s when
the first Uzbek dictionary was posted.)
cross
response 112 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 13:15 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 113 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 18 20:36 UTC 2003

I heard about one office that implemented passwords that expired once a
month, and prohibited repeating the same password twice in a row.  They
found most of their users started setting their password to the name of
the current month.
jmsaul
response 114 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 01:22 UTC 2003

No surprise.  That's exactly what they should have expected with a policy like
that.  That or alternating passwords.  Users dislike having to reset passwords
often, and find ways to defeat the alleged benefits if they're forced to.

(And if you don't let them alternate passwords, they write them down on post-
it notes under their mouse pad or on the side of their monitor.)
gull
response 115 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 02:22 UTC 2003

Yeah.  Or they just never log out, which is even worse.
jmsaul
response 116 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 03:37 UTC 2003

That's more controllable.
cross
response 117 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 04:17 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tsty
response 118 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 07:06 UTC 2003

"someting more standard" is non-grexian, by defintion ......
/
gull
response 119 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 14:09 UTC 2003

But probably still a good idea. :)
tsty
response 120 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 15:51 UTC 2003

not a problem except that i don;t know 'how to do it' :
  
all too often i receive  attachments  at this address. 
i use good ol'    mail
what part of the content do i save and then 'translate' (and
by what means) so that i can d/l the attachment and use it?
  
usually these are  ms word docs.
janc
response 121 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 19:00 UTC 2003

Re #118:  I think we should change that definition, in most cases.
jhudson
response 122 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 20:02 UTC 2003

My passwords are proper nouns from a private fantacy world.
Despite the fact that I rotate only a few, nobody is going to
get a good handle on them.
cross
response 123 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 19 20:36 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tsty
response 124 of 224: Mark Unseen   May 20 11:28 UTC 2003

any thoughts on #120 . and the mail attachment problem?
 
 please don't suggest pine though, i want to know the steps from
mail to a usable file.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss