You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-106      
 
Author Message
7 new of 106 responses total.
srw
response 100 of 106: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 00:02 UTC 1997

Comparing this change to making us like Usenet is a false comparison.
This much more akin to the concept of a guest account which is read-only.
Something we found very hard to implement in telnet, but is trivial in http.
tsty
response 101 of 106: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 11:19 UTC 1997

congratulations to void and arthurp!
ladymoon
response 102 of 106: Mark Unseen   Mar 1 02:31 UTC 1997

Steven, how is it false. I mean, saying it is false shows us nothing but that
you think so- at least in #99 he told us why he thought it does make us like
USENET.
srw
response 103 of 106: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 12:02 UTC 1997

In Usenet, all of the items are world/read/write. Posting to usenet is 
not anythinbg anyone can limit. Pete is making it seem that this change 
would make us like that. 

WIth this change posting is still limited to People with Grex accounts. 
It is only reading that people could do without an account. You may find 
that objectionable, but it is nothing like Usenet.

In fact I don't see anything in #99 that explains *why* Pete thinks this 
would make us like Usenet.
pfv
response 104 of 106: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 20:33 UTC 1997

        Sorry, srw, not "making" anything.. other than a statement
        as to how it appears..

        S'ok, you guys do whatever you want - you still end up
        deciding for _all_ users, and it still becomes a Net-available
        resource akin to Usenet..

        Why would posting make a difference, by the way..? I mean,
        we already see the wording "users of grex w/o accounts" and
        have heard how newuser is too intimidating.. <shrug>
srw
response 105 of 106: Mark Unseen   Mar 6 05:45 UTC 1997

Sorry, Pete. I guess I still do see a big difference between what we're 
proposing and Usenet. If it turned us into anything like that, I'd (1) 
be very surprised, and (2) argue for dropping the facility.

No, I don't believe for a moment that newuser is too intimidating to 
most people. I think it is simply more trouble than it is perceived as 
being worth, and I think the idea of having an account (with all that 
entails, like remembering a password) offers a resistance level. Like 
the activation energy of a chemical reaction. You need a push to get 
over the hump.

The Grex Members will do whatever they want. I am only trying to explain 
why I think it is in Grex's best interest to allow unregistered users to 
see the conferences. Perhaps with luck I may be able to influence an 
undecided voter to agree with me. I don't expect to convince someone who 
already disagrees.
rcurl
response 106 of 106: Mark Unseen   Mar 6 20:02 UTC 1997

That's still possible, though - its's too bad if minds are fixed in concrete.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-106      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss