You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124      
 
Author Message
25 new of 124 responses total.
gregc
response 100 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 04:58 UTC 1995

Looks enticing. I see one big problem though. A system like that could only
be read only. There's no posting capability.
steve
response 101 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 05:42 UTC 1995

   I dunno Marc: when I've given my email address out for various
things, time and time again I've gotten a "oh?  Grex?" type of query
from people.  It had me pretty surprised at first.  Grex is known for
being "odd" on the net--we're going against the grain in a number of
ways now, and we've survived.  Now, I'm not saying that we're known
like netcom is, but an awful lot of people seem to recognize
cyberspace.org.
mdw
response 102 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 09:57 UTC 1995

Grex is bound to only become better known, as time goes on.  It is
certainly widely known, - anyone who cares about such systems is not
going to have any trouble finding out about grex.

There aren't any rules about what PlayBoy might do.  It's very much up
to them in terms of what they might or might not do - limited only by
the size of their pocketbooks, and the brains of their detectives &
lawyers.  I don't know that it really matters what they'll probably do -
there's much too much of a chance they'll do something other than that,
and there's no reason why we should *want* to become their target.
marcvh
response 103 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 10:30 UTC 1995

(Re 101, I've seen more people who recognize "cyberspace.com" myself, or
 Cleveland's Freenet; I don't see where I would have heard of Grex if
 I hadn't been at the famous 1991 meeting.)
robh
response 104 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 11:34 UTC 1995

Yanoff's List comes to mind, we're one of *two* systems listed
for public-access Unix.  And Yanoff's List is pretty well known
on the Internet.
cordell
response 105 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 15:21 UTC 1995

I  think that everyone should have access to usenet and the abaility to post
carson
response 106 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 17:16 UTC 1995

<carson resists the urge to comment>
sidhe
response 107 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 21 05:37 UTC 1995

        Okay, now that I understand your position, tsty.. I agree.
I see no need for USENet, and I do not wish for login to be any
longer than this evening.. <10 minutes to go from connection to the picospan
prompt!!>. And this atrocious speed was without USENet bogging down the
works! You say we're known for going against the grain on the net?
Then let's go a little further, and *not* have USENet! You keep saying
you want to reach out to the local community, but I see USENet as
taking people's time away from doing what I'm doing right now! Using
PicoSpan, to express one's self LOCALLY, i.e., here!
steve
response 108 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 21:05 UTC 1995

   Rob, can you get more information about this system for news?
Posting isn't so much a problem; we can always post via some other
system, like condor.ic.net for example.  The amount of articles that
Grex would collectively post is miniscule compared to the about of
data read every day.
ajax
response 109 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 22:59 UTC 1995

  I just talked to PageSat, and they faxed 15 pages of info and
articles.  It's $695 for a 2 foot dish, $895 for a 3 foot dish
(recommended for the east coast, and chosen by some others to improve
bad-weather reception).  It includes your choice of a wall mount, pole
mount, or non-penetrating roof mount.
 
  The ongoing service fee is $30/month, but you have to pay the first
year up front ($360).
 
  They'll also deliver your e-mail for a $30 one-time fee, but our
current feed seems reliable, and reliability is much more important
for mail than for news.  A Fidonet feed is also available free through
1/96.
 
  They claim to deliver 180MB/day of usenet news, and depending on
the section of ad copy, carry every newsgroup they can get, every
"U.S. newsgroup heirarchy", or "virtually every newgroup".  They
currently receive over 20 NNTP feeds, some of which are major backbone
feeds such as DEC-WRL and CERFnet, which they say provides a fast
up-to-date feed that will "get you that item someone posted for sale
faster than virtually any other means."  (Hey, like a used terminal
server! :)
 
  They sell a DOS package for $75, but provide Unix source free, which
runs on SunOS, Linux, and BSDI, among many others.
 
  Technically, their dish sends the signal via coax to a modem-like
box, which demodulates the data while converting it from sync to
async.  It then goes into the host via a user-supplied RS232 cable as
GZIP compressed batches.
 
  Since this is their info packet, they don't include much about the
drawbacks, like how much news we're likely to lose due to weather.
However, one of the articles, after a mostly glowing review, did have
a negative section:
 
  "Pagesat is not without critics.  Ironically, the most visible
  criticism is in a netnews group called biz.page.sat, where customer
  reports vary.  One user claimed that aiming the dish was so
  difficult that he paid a satellite TV installer to do it for him.
  (Brennan, however, says that it took him five minutes to aim his.)
  Others have reported delays in transmission which could have been
  caused at Pagesat or elsewhere.  A number of early users have
  upgraded to a larger dish for more signal fade margin.
 
  Our experience with the system has been good, but your mileage may
  vary.  An unobstructed view of the satellite is required, and the
  'offset feed' dish makes it appear to be looking higher in the sky
  than it is, so that hills or trees may be more significant obstacles
  than they appear to be. Software may not do what exactly you need or
  fit your operating environment without some work...check before you
  buy."
 
  One potential problem is that the dungeon is in a pretty
tree-intensive area, as I recall.  (A disadvantage of living in the
Tree City!)
 
  By the way, another idea, purely as fantasy, is their satellite
uplink, available for $3000/month.  Yeah it's expensive, but imagine
it: Grex, the first Michigan BBS to not pay a nickle to Ameritech!!!
steve
response 110 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 27 23:03 UTC 1995

   This is very interesting Rob.  Thanks for going after it.  Must
one use their dish and decoder to receive the data?  Any technical
data about whos transponder they're using, etc?  If we can get details,
we can measure the signal strength of the system and determine how
good an lna we'd need, and how much gain on the antenna.  This does
sound interesting.
   Also, I'd like to drop on by and clone that fax.
ajax
response 111 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 07:04 UTC 1995

  Sounds like you need their decoder, and are better off with their
dish.  It might be worth looking for a used one in the newsgroup they
mention, but they changed dishes to a better one not too long ago, so
I doubt we'd find a good used one.
 
  "PageSat ships the system complete with a PCSAT100 Data Terminal, a
.63 meter or 1 meter parabolic dish with a high stability LNB, and
software."
 
  "Hardware consists of a parabolic Ku-band antenna system which
includes <smudge> high stability low noise block converter (LNB).  A
high quality piece of RG59 coax is included and brought indoors to the
PCSAT 100 Wireless Usenet Data Terminal.  Antenna alignment is easily
completed via a 1Khz reference beacon tone that PageSat continually
broadcasts."
 
  "Q: Can I use an existing satellite system, and just buy the modem?
Existing satellite receivers are not stable enough to receive the
signal, and the LNB's frequency may not be stable enough.  Also, if
you move the dish to watch another satellite you will lose your feed.
You may use an existing Ku-Band antenna but it is recommended that you
use a PageSat supplied LNB."
 
  "Q: What satellite is the carrier?  GE Americom's K-2."
mdw
response 112 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 11:14 UTC 1995

Michigan is also pretty cloudy - and often rainy/snow/&etc.  Our results
might not be nearly as positive as somebody located further south -
especially after 5-10 years of corrosion.  (Although I think usenet's
growth would have made the dish pointless long before then...)
steve
response 113 of 124: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 15:52 UTC 1995

   Clouds won't affect Ku band transmissions that much.  Not more than
10 - 20 dB, which I'm sure they are calculating.
   Glad to see they're including so much information.  I'm not sure
yet, but their system is probably cheaper.  Using a LNB means that
the little box at the focus point of the dish not only receives the
microwaves, but downconverts it to some much lower frequency, which
is then decoded.  This might be a worthwhile thing for us to do.
tsty
response 114 of 124: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 05:46 UTC 1995

Onto what machine?
ajax
response 115 of 124: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 06:06 UTC 1995

Probably a future Usenet machine.  A couple other kinks to a dish is how
the dungeon-lord would react to it, and possibly city ordinances about
parabolic rooftop decor.
lilmo
response 116 of 124: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 06:11 UTC 1995

Has further thought gone into this?  Is it being discussed in another item?
ajax
response 117 of 124: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 06:14 UTC 1995

It was discussed in the budget planning item, and was prioritized behind 
some other tasks and expenditures.  In other words, it's on the back burner.
(Still simmering though :-).
lilmo
response 118 of 124: Mark Unseen   Mar 26 19:14 UTC 1995

I understand.  Thanks for the update.
gdx
response 119 of 124: Mark Unseen   Apr 14 13:02 UTC 1995

quit`
`
nephi
response 120 of 124: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 21:47 UTC 1995

Welcome to Grex, gdx!  It gets easier with practice.
doomfrog
response 121 of 124: Mark Unseen   May 18 16:21 UTC 1995

well, re the adult newsgroup, the cleveland freenet handles that pretty
well, they allow people to access them, but ask them to send in a copy of
their drivers license and signed form saying they're over 18 and are
requesting permission.  Then if any legal problems come up, well they were
a victim of fraud and not liable.  Also, that way people who are 'scared'
of seeing stuff they don't want to see don't have to, everyones happy.
     I think that the PC box for usenet would probably be the easiest,
less expensive to maintain, and hell, since most of us HAVE PC's, you
might get people willing to donate one temporarilly or permanently for
those charity things on taxes to help out if you have problems.
     Sidez, I notice some really huge places, like the freenets use em,
and also, a lot of the local, one line bbs's get on these echo things
cheaply with fidonet to post messages, worst comes to worst you could
probably find a way to rig one of those setups up.  Only problem is its
kind of slow.
     In addition, you might be  able to shuffle other things over to it,
if you ran linux for instance, you might be able to have it using its
CPU for games, irc clients, etc, and freeing up more cycles for grex here.
jared
response 122 of 124: Mark Unseen   May 29 22:15 UTC 1995

I'm back in town, whomever wants to work with me to get the nntp reading
going, drop me e-mail -- jared@nether.net
popcorn
response 123 of 124: Mark Unseen   May 31 13:16 UTC 1995

Thanks Jared!
jared
response 124 of 124: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 05:22 UTC 1995

For those that want usenet news, you can read it on nether.net.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss